FrankoElTanko Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 I just read somewhere among the midst of twitter fodder/rotoworld that Hurst is supposed to fall completely out of the first. IF we land a QB that we feel comfortable with and it does not cost us our (lowest) second rd pick, would you take Hurst or stick to the OL/WR/LB plan for our second draft selection, assuming Ragnow/Price/Chark/Smith/Vander Esch are gone? What does everyone think? Plus its nice to not talk QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAinLack. Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 Quick on his feet, run stuffer, can penetrate backfield and be disruptive. Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stokes84 Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 Hurst should be a top 10 pick if not for the heart issue, so sure. He's one of the best big 10 lineman I've seen in years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#34fan Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Tim Settle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts