DarthICE Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Is sitting the bench / used as a utility player. So if Spiller was never going to be a full time back, why draft him 9th? Why pay him all this money? It is a moronic decision if that is the case. We should have taken Javhid Best at 9 so we could have a full time starting RB if we were going that route. As you know I had high hopes for Nix and Gailey, but if they honestly just picked Spiller to be a utility player at 9, then they are no better than Levy/ Brandon were at drafting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b stein 22 Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Well i guess were going to suck for the next 6-10 years. I dont know if I can last that long though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. ChumChums Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 The last RB that we drafted in the 1st round that we didn't really use correctly for the first few seasons...was the Juice. I don't know if that's a good or bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBeane Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Is sitting the bench / used as a utility player. So if Spiller was never going to be a full time back, why draft him 9th? Why pay him all this money? It is a moronic decision if that is the case. We should have taken Javhid Best at 9 so we could have a full time starting RB if we were going that route. As you know I had high hopes for Nix and Gailey, but if they honestly just picked Spiller to be a utility player at 9, then they are no better than Levy/ Brandon were at drafting. Dude, it was Week 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts