bonechiller Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Why does't Buffalo consider a trade for disgruntled WR V. Jackson. We need another big time threat opposite Evans. Maybe a second round pick and/or Lynch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Why does't Buffalo consider a trade for disgruntled WR V. Jackson. We need another big time threat opposite Evans. Maybe a second round pick and/or Lynch San Diego is only allowing him to negotiate with Seattle for whatever reason, you'd also have to sign him to a lucrative long term deal and he is suspended for the first 3 games of the season due to violating the leagues conduct policy (multiple DUI's). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharper802 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Could have had Brandon Marshall for the same deal. Why did the FO not address the offensive tackle position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poznasty51 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Could have had Brandon Marshall for the same deal. Why did the FO not address the offensive tackle position? Bingo. If they feel that the talent was totally inadequate, they would have made some sort of FA acquisition or trade by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts