phypon
-
Posts
2,300 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by phypon
-
-
4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
MAGAs can’t interpret the simplest text. I’m talking actuarial data. Look it up
You're a loser and a liar. keep threatening people though. You're a psycho. You've completely exposed yourself. Threaten me again and get yourself banned. Go ahead, threaten my life again. F*cking psycho. Go for it, I dare you...
-
1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Not worthy but f it… 1 year at 64 is relative; To how you feel , to how you function, to how long you figure on living, to your happiness. I had another good day. I hope yours was $hitty.
Can somebody translate that for me? This "guy" lies about his age, most likely isn't even a "doctor". F*cking liar, loser. To think, for a hot second I actually respected you as a poster. You're a POS liar.
"to how long your figure on living". What the hell are you talking about? Is that some kind of threat? Are you serious? If you are threatening my life I will f*ck you up dude. You are certifiably nutz!
-
3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Last response to your bs barring the unlikely event you’ll ever post something worthy of comment. 64. I’ll post my license as soon as “Doc” does.
nah, somebody already posted the receipts dude. You were 65 last year and now your 64. You're a liar. Hey, everybody, we have a real life Benjamin Button in our midst, lol. You're a f*cking tool, lol. F*cking liar.
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
It’s here if you bothered to look. 64 Gold tees next year. Still hit it further than the waste of protoplasm you adore.
Get a life. She’s a few years older. Alumni connections are important. Find another obsession
Looks like you are lying about your age Joe. Why do that?
-
4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Younger than orange man. I play white tees he plays reds.
So you're afraid to say your age. What kind of man are you? How old are you, Joe? Simple question.
-
1
-
-
28 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
How old is your orange Messiah?
How old are you?
-
7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
You want to know way too much about my junk. It’s very disturbing. Keep your hands on your lady bits and stop worrying about everyone else’s junk. It’s weird and socially unacceptable.
yeah, whatever dude
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Band sounds familiar. Think my grandfather mentioned them once.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Yet you offer no rebuttal…At least python tries albeit with pretzel logic.
F*ck off, Joe.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Scraps said:
WTF? A "NON request" proves your point? What is the point of sending a "NON request"? If you go to a bar, do you call the bartender over to specifically say "I have a NON request"? Do you walk into your bosses office and say "I have a NON request"? Nobody does that.
What was the purpose of the third paragraph?
"We are mindful that in 2020, MPD was expected to perform the demanding tasks of policing large crowds while working around unidentifiable personnel deployed to the District of Columbia without proper coordination. Unidentifiable personnel-in many cases, armed-caused confusion among the residents and visitors and could become a national security threat with no way for MPD and federal law enforcement to decipher armed groups."
You specifically avoided that paragraph altogether, even when asked. If the purpose of the letter was a "NON request", that paragraph wouldn't exist.
The letter asks that anything that is deployed is coordinated through the Metropolitan Police Department. Why can't you acknowledge that?
Enough. You're an idiot. If you don't understand the letter I don't know what to tell you. Play your word salad somewhere else. You look like a fool. Play your games with your imaginary friends if that makes you feel better. People in the real world have no time for ones like you.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:
Maybe I don’t talk about my junk with weirdos who ask about it. Do you talk about your lady bits with other people? Probably not. Because that would be weird. Just like it’s weird to ask others about their junk.
Dude, you can't even say if you are a man or a woman. F*ck off. You're def not a man. F*cking idiot p*ssy. You're a psycho.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Scraps said:
The noun "coordination" has a lot more meaning than the article or adverb "the", word game boy.
I read the entire letter in full context, without ignoring any words like you did. While it does not request any more assets, it asks that anything that is deployed is coordinated through the Metropolitan Police Department. The third paragraph explains why. That's it.
"boy", lol. To the bolded, thank you for proving my point! Have a nice day!
-
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:
I have to say that it’s pretty gross that you’re so interested in the junk of an Internet rando. First you hate cops, now you’re doing junk checks on strangers. Very, very weird.
I'm a man. That was easy. Why can't you answer a simple question? F*cking weirdo.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
Also not funny. And, why is MAGA so into junk checks? Weird.
Oh, surprise! You can't answer if you are a man or a woman. God forbid someone ask you a simple question. So, are you a man or a woman?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Scraps said:
I read the entire letter. The word coordination, or some variant of it, is in EVERY paragraph, including the 4th paragraph.
Yes, and the word "the" is in every paragraph too. You're trying to play the word game in order to ignore the context and premise of the letter because you are trying to deflect in order to suit your narrative. It's literally spelled out for you that the point of the letter was a NON request for assistance from the NG. I know you know this. Accept it.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Scraps said:
You want it so bad you do it. Include ALL the words in the entire paragraph please.
I don't need to post it. I read the entire letter. You clearly did not. You saw the word "coordination" and stopped reading and ran with that. You're tripling down and making yourself look foolish at this point. Go read it, all of it. It's not that hard and not that many words.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Scraps said:
I am reading the plain meaning of the letter. The word "coordination" or some variant of it is used in EVERY paragraph. It asks that anything that is deployed is coordinated through the Metropolitan Police Department. That's it.
The third paragraph explains why they want such coordination.
"We are mindful that in 2020, MPD was expected to perform the demanding tasks of policing large crowds while working around unidentifiable personnel deployed to the District of Columbia without proper coordination. Unidentifiable personnel-in many cases, armed-caused confusion among the residents and visitors and could become a national security threat with no way for MPD and federal law enforcement to decipher armed groups."
It's actually 4 paragraphs. You conveniently skipped that one. Post the 4th paragraph, please. That's the important one. Did you not see/read that one?
-
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:
This is obviously weird, but it’s less obvious what any of this gibberish is supposed to mean. I appreciate a good comeback, but this isn’t even remotely understandable. When you’re not busy hating on cops and Haitians, be better!
Are you a dude or a chick?
-
3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
Phony P is back! Somebody was throwing out an old fire extinguisher the other day and I thought of you. I wonder, I thought to myself, if that Phony P guy would want that to weaponize that thang to knock around some Capitol Police the next time he’s in DC. Here’s to you, cop-hating MAGA Phony P!
TMI, dude. Keep your spank bank collection to yourself. Here's another thought for you, next time you're banging your wife, picture me banging your wife. Good luck with that!
-
2 minutes ago, B-Man said:
Kamala Harris once said police could pay surprise visits to legal gun owners’ homes for safe storage checks.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-once-said-police-133749431.htmlSorry if already mentioned, but she also said:
-
1 minute ago, Scraps said:
There had been news articles that the Federal Government had deployed law enforcement to several cities during the BLM riots without coordinating with local authorities. This letter was sent to insure that there should be coordination and unified command in the District of Columbia. The letter asks for coordination with the MPD more than once as well.
On Jan 5, they did not see a need for more law enforcement. Why would they? The people coming to Washington D.C. were part of the party of law and order. Bowser and company may have been wrong in their assessment but the letter is clear. There should be coordination with the MPD for any deployment of any additional deployments.
None of this would have been necessary if Trump had accepted the results of the election he lost at any time prior to Jan 6. Trump is responsible for the problems on Jan 6.
No. You're spinning and failing miserably. The facts are that DC specifically did NOT request the NG. A letter was specifically sent detailing a non-request. It's a short letter containing 3 paragraphs. Read it, all of it. You don't have to support Trump or switch your allegiance to see what is actually in the letter and to see that the actual events have been distorted to fit a specific narrative that is false. That should be concerning regardless of who anyone supports politically.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Scraps said:
And the second sentence? Why did you ignore that? You keep ignoring the parts that ask for responses to be coordinated through the MPD.
There is no coordination without a request or approval. It was specifically stated, more than once, that there was no request. You keep ignoring that. Read the last paragraph again. DC required either a request by them or a consultation before any coordination. It's a simple flow chart. Also, consultation or coordination does not inherently mean that DC would have allowed the NG to participate. If you don't understand what this letter entails by now then have a fun night with a dirty sock, a banana peel, and your thesaurus.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Scraps said:
The request is in the second paragraph.
The second paragraph consists of two sentences. The first sentence specifically says that there is no request by DC for personnel from any other agencies.
-
1 minute ago, Scraps said:
It discourages any deployment without notification or consultation. Without knowing about the deployment, a blue on blue incident is more likely to occur. Hence everything should be coordinated through MPD.
There is no "hence". There was specifically no request.
-
1
-
Nancy Pelosi refused National Guard Troops, pre authorized by Trump, for J6.
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Really, so when someone says to me "to how long you figure on living" that's not a threat? The next time someone threatens me I will defend myself. I haven't threatened anyone on here, EVER. This is not to be taken lightly. Please read the correspondence again. I did not file a false report.