Jump to content

Trekking

Community Member
  • Posts

    100
  • Joined

Posts posted by Trekking

  1. 1 minute ago, Scott7975 said:

    Oh FFS die on your hill.  No one is going to take you seriously here.  59 posts and your reputation is already shot over this stupid crap.  Although, I am sure you been here before on another name and didn't just sign up recently so its probably nothing new for you.

    My reputation to post ratios is looking hotter than you 🤩

  2. 1 minute ago, Scott7975 said:

     

    That is not what you said.  You said this "Games we lost were games Josh ignored Beasley."

     

    You were wrong.  Just own up.  You are wrong on your changed statement too so maybe you can own up now on both of these or maybe you want to move the goal posts again dig yourself deeper.  Just so you know, I looked at the games and Beasley was getting targets from the Bills first drive and throughout the game so you might want to just stop now.

    Outlet targets and designed targets aren’t the same thing. Stats don’t tell that story

  3. 4 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

     

    You might want to actually do some research before you spew nonsense.  In 4 of the Bills 6 losses, Beasley had 4 of his 6 highest target games.  9, 8, 8, and 7 targets in those losses.  Only two games seen higher targets of 10 and 11 against the Dolphins and WTF Football team.

    Because he got targets too late

  4. This is going to bite us. Games we lost were games Josh ignored Beasley. Games we salvaged were games Josh ignored Beasley until the second half and then all of a sudden got over the hump. Daboll tried to ignore Beasley and go to less reliable options. 
     

    I see us struggling down the wire without Beasley. His replacements are serviceable but aren’t as clutch. 

  5. On 11/12/2021 at 12:35 PM, sullim4 said:

     

    I've got a bridge to sell you if you think Bills games will be going for $6/mo under the existing subscription model.

     

    Placing NFL games on ESPN+ will undoubtedly raise the price of the package, or be an expensive add-on that will require you to have the underlying ESPN+ subscription.  They might require the "Disney Bundle" to be purchased, so you'll also need to subscribe to Disney+ and Hulu.

     

    I would much rather have a tech company own the streaming rights - Disney does not exactly excel at software engineering.  I would be curious to see how well their service would scale under the load that NFL games would bring.  They use AWS's underlying infrastructure, but in the end, the Disney software engineers and ops teams are calling the shots and writing the code.

    Hockey was 200$/season and got put on plus for nothing 

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...