Herc11
-
Posts
1,152 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Herc11
-
-
1 hour ago, Buffalo03 said:
I think you're naive if you think any any woman may not lead you on at any random time. These are professional athletes with lots of money. I think it's very safe to assume that even at work, yes, a woman can lead a guy on at work. I'm not saying it happened in this situation but for you to make a sarcastic remark like it would never ever ever ever happen is just naive.
It's grinding. My main concern would be something far worse than that. Would I want it to happen? No, but to sue him for it? Come on. It's the same if I had a wife, a girl at work put her a** into me on purpose and hit on me, would I think my wife would like it? Probably not, but I'm not suing her over it either
Did you really say, "It's grinding"? Like, what's the big deal? Holy crap, if you think that's ok, I'd hate to see your interactions with women.
And btw, people of both sexes dress in a way to attract someone. That doesn't mean they are trying to, or want to, attract everyone. It doesn't give you or anyone else permission to sexually assault them. Same if they are "leading you on." It's not a free pass to get your rocks off.
-
1
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, Dablitzkrieg said:
Welcome to the internet
Classic excuse
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, PBF81 said:
LOL
What's the going rate for babysitters for NFL players. Maybe I'll apply.
Well technically he is a on an employer charted flight for a business trip. The company is also responsible for his actions and rightfully so. You don't think the brass was on that flight?
-
4
-
2
-
-
I get the attempt at humor here. However, if this was your wife, girlfriend, sister, friend... Would you still be making light of the situation? Ie: "tried to touch a booby"
-
6
-
1
-
-
23 hours ago, DJB said:
Such quality people over there in KC
It's KC, but come on. This has nothing to do with quality people. It's gat dam MJ for crying out loud.
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, MJS said:
Most dlines rotate in the NFL. People who think the Bills are unique by rotating just don't understand how common it is. Not saying that is you, but I see a lot of people complaining about the dline rotation.
True, but with players like Watt, Bosa, Garret, etc... teams don't rotate them. Those guys are 3-4 down players and typically only come out for a breather. We don't have that guy. Even if Miller returns to form, with his age and injuries, he will be rotated like everyone else to keep him fresh into post-season.
-
Dpoy isn't in the cards for our d-line. The rotation takes away too many opportunities.
-
4
-
-
2 minutes ago, Chaos said:
We will never know if he is doing a good job or not. We will have zero insight into how many times McDermott ignores the advice.
We most certainly will. If they keep him around, he's doing the intended job. If not, he won't be here again.
-
McBeane out here playing 4D chess. Now if only he could lure Ernie Adams out of retirement.
-
3
-
-
2 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:
What I’m getting from my question is you don’t really need a #1 wide receiver, just a guy that teams have to account for more and that can be relied on to make catches. I think that guy for us is Kincaid.
I think Kincaid has the potential, just isn't quite there yet. We'll see if his growth continues into year 2.
-
1 hour ago, Low Positive said:
Ravens just this last year. No one had over 900 yards receiving and only Flowers had over 600. They won 13 games. It was Lamar that strikes the fear. https://www.espn.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/bal/baltimore-ravens
He stated no one over 1k yards and the offense producing over 5k through the air. The Ravens did not produce more than 5k through the air. Their offense was a success as more a byproduct of Lamar running along with a run-first philosophy. Lamar barely hit 4k yards passing.
-
A better term would be #1 target. As we know, Brady had Gronk and Pat had Kelce. They aren't WR, but they give the same benefit as a #1 WR.
A true #1 target is someone another team has to scheme for. This person is open even when they are not open. Contested catches, reliable week in and week out. Routinely beats their coverage. They are going to get you 1200+ yards and ~10 TDs a year.
8 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:I sometimes think the #1WR is overblown.
What if a team rotates 5 wideouts, none of whom surpass 1,000 yards. But when you add in the TEs and backs, the offense still gains 5,000 yards through the air. Do the fans then think: "Well, we would have had 6,000 yards if we had a true #1!"
Is there even any examples of this actually being done?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Success said:
Reminder: the most successful team in NFL history only prioritized the WR position ONCE, and didn't win a SB when they did that.
That team also won with defense early on before rules changed. Then became a offensive powerhouse with Moss, then with Gronk, welker, etc...
-
2 minutes ago, DJB said:
Anyone know what we got for the GB pick?
Cheese curds
-
Beane not even trying to move around. He must not like what's left. Put it on auto-draft and closed shop
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, QLBillsFan said:
Diggs was a “star” how was he in key games? I’ll take good players who step up.
Ok, so who are our good players that have stepped up in the playoffs? We have yet to have anyone take over a game except for Josh.
-
1 hour ago, flmike said:
Neither were producing as needed. What falloff do you see with the current group plus a possible 4th-5th steal pick?
What I don't see at this time is a star offensive player other than Josh. Mahomes didn't have a star WR, but he had a star TE that he could always rely on.
-
6 hours ago, Doc Brown said:
Chiefs won with defense last postseason and opportunistic mostly mistake free offense. There's more than one way to skin a cat.
Sooooo a consistent offense?
-
1 minute ago, ChronicAndKnuckles said:
Considering it’s the defense that continually fails in the post-season it’s probably a good idea.
Considering it’s the defense that continually fails in the post-season it’s probably a good idea.
Considering it’s the defense that continually fails in the post-season it’s probably a good idea.
Considering it’s the defense that continually fails in the post-season it’s probably a good idea.
If the offense was more consistent you may not need to rely on the d to make a stop to win the game.
-
Just now, Alphadawg7 said:
So why are you upset we just drafted one of the best red zone targets in the draft? No disrespect, but I don't get what you are unhappy with then.
Beane created a major hole at WR by trading Diggs on top of already losing Davis. Then, at least so far, has given a half-assed approach to fill that gaping hole. An unproven vet and a rookie with questionable speed. It would of been nice to see Beane be a little more aggressive trying to find a legit Diggs replacement.
-
Just now, Alphadawg7 said:
No, that alone says he is a dual threat weapon that has always been part of his game.
I don't disagree. But come on, doing it yourself that many times shows you don't have the red zone targets you need.
-
2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:
You do realize that we are the 2nd highest scoring team in the NFL over the past 4 seasons, our QB is a perennial MVP candidate and averages 5100 yards and 44 TD's over that span right?
People act like Allen has had no help at all. Beane traded up for Kincaid last year, we have a young WR in Shakir who just led the NFL in efficiency, catch rate, and yards per target who plays like a mini Deebo, we have a duel threat RB, and signed a quality veteran in Samuel. Now we just added top prospect in the draft at WR too. Plus we still have Knox and him combined with Kincaid gives us one of the best TE rooms in the NFL.
This notion Allen has no weapons is just a gross exaggeration.
Im telling you now...Allen very well could have his best season of his career this season. Shakir and Coleman bring some much needed toughness to the offense. Where was Diggs when the season got late and games got more physical? Allens INT rate was double throwing to Diggs and Davis than it was throwing to everyone else.
Allen is going to spread the ball around and now has a guy who can go up and get balls too, which we sorely needed. We went from drop city to a team made up of guys with great hands and intelligence.
How many TDs did Allen run last year versus throw? That alone shows he didn't have the help he needed last year.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, The Jokeman said:
How many teams took 2 WRs so far? Cuz ya know double dipping should help teams that have bad WRs like Baltimore and Arizona and Carolina....
How many teams lost their top 2 WR this off-season?
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, JerseyBills said:
yall are just obsessed with adding WR. Completely ignoring 20 other positions
Maybe cuz we lost our WR 1 and 2 in the same off season
-
1
-
Aaron Rodgers limping at Jets OTA's
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
You're disgusted because he isn't sad about Roger's injury??
How are you still on the internet if that's the level it takes to be disgusted?