Jump to content

Niagara

Community Member
  • Posts

    343
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Niagara

  1. 10 minutes ago, ngbills said:

    Who is that player? Our highest is under $20m I believe. 

    https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/josh-allen-25102/#:~:text=Current Contract&text=In 2023%2C Allen will earn,dead cap value of %2471%2C289%2C124.

     

    Josh Allen signed a 6 year, $258,034,000 contract with the Buffalo Bills, including a $16,500,000 signing bonus, $150,000,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $43,005,667.

  2. On 3/15/2023 at 6:41 PM, Einstein said:

     

    I understand that you have to sign some of your own, but the unfortunate part is that we do not have enough cap space to get new players.

     

    Of our 2 new players, 1 has never made it through a full football season and has been on IR at some point for 2 of the last 3 seasons. The other was the 68th ranked free agent, according to NFL.com

    It is hard paying one player 40-50 million, and expect a good team.

  3. 20 hours ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

    I’ve defended for him and I’ve said some things about him in frustration. But I’m glad he’s our QB and I wouldn’t trade him for anyone. The guy was born to play here

    Just for laughs, go to the Bengal's "Jungle" and see how beloved Joe Cool Burrow is. He is a real good, an Ohio boy and may win. Allen is an adopted Buffalo mafia boy who I would not trade, even to win on Sunday.

    Pity the Jets, Ravens, Cardinals, Raiders, Dolphins, Rams, Green Bay, Vikings, for their QB situation.

  4. 44 minutes ago, Gugny said:

    A week ago, I was nearly certain the Bills are going to lose this game.

     

    A couple days ago, I was fairly confident the Bills are going to win this game.

     

    In a few hours, I'll have the Bills winning by 8.

     

    By 7pm ET tonight, I'll be predicting a 2-score win for the Bills.

    Word is Stafford's arm is hurt. Kept away from any real test.

    • Agree 1
  5. 3 hours ago, Backintheday544 said:

    Republicans basically did work on packing the court the second McConnell refused to give advice and consent on Garland.

    When Kennedy demonized a Constitutional scholar Robert Bork, that was it for me. No more Mr. nice guy. The Republicans got to appoint Souter who was a liberal. The Democrats stole that seat. When has a nominee from a Democrat President not been confirmed bc he is too liberal? Garland was pay back for Bork.

    • Like (+1) 3
  6. 4 hours ago, shoshin said:

    Don't be a lowlife. I didn't report DR. Not once. Not ever. 

    But are you not the person who advocated the closing down of the PPP, probably largely because of DR. Now that he is gone, all is well with the world. Someone complained  (TFR most likely), and it seems to have been a coordinated effort.

    Hollow victory though. One prolific poster like DR are worth 20 dink n donk Tiberius types.

    Speakupwny.com was very active... once upon a time... Indeed, perhaps the PPP should be closed and TBD be a football only site like most other cities..

     

    Now how to find DR on Parler.com

  7. 26 minutes ago, shoshin said:

     

    If this place is a cesspool, why not try to clean it up by introducing yourself. Your community here is bigger than one person.

    About you, what is your position on?

    Conspiracy theories: aliens, 911, Kennedy assassination, deaths surrounding Clinton family Foster +, Obama birth certificate real/hoax?

    China: confront or bend over?

    Immigration: open or tight borders?

    US world peacekeeper or one of many?

    Mostly Peaceful Protests, or Riots?

    BLM painted on Pennsylvania and 5th Ave

    Free Speech or Cancel Culture?

    Patriot or Citizen of the World?

    Forgive student debt?

    Free Health Care for illegals?

    Guaranteed annual income?

     

    You seem like you worked hard in life. Given such a background I would expect conservative positions on issues, but often 

    I am very wrong.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    o

  8. 11 hours ago, shoshin said:


    That’s your takeaway?

     

    The owner of the site, a human being with a real life and problems had some guy who was too big for his britches (on a football politics board, nice!!) busting his chops so he banned him. He had a reason. He gave it. And guess what: He didn’t even need a reason. 
     

    Let’s all act more civil here and like we were in person and maybe this place survives. If not, shut it down and take posts like yours to Twitter. Better yet just be a compassionate person all the time. 

    You get worst post of the decade and should really apologize in case you’re just on a bender and regret this in the morning. 

    My takeaway was you bombarded SDS with complaints about a subforum peacefully existing over three years. You being part of cancel culture could not stand that. You probably threaten legal action if SDS does not comply to your demands. 

    The Millard Fillmore statue next to City Hall still stands. That needs to come down. That can be your next project.

    • Awesome! (+1) 2
  9. 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    Again, I wanted DR here. I was quite clear that I wanted to expose exactly how poisonous some of his conspiratorial thinking was getting.

    But in shoshin's defense: he did seem to think that this wasn't Politics, Pundits, and Polls, but rather "Anti-Trump Insurrection, World Conspiracy, and the Coming Reckoning." Everything revolved around that. And from what I've learned -- thank you DR, you led me into studying how bizarre this whole world is -- that is unfortunately typical for those who have gone off the mega-conspiracy deep end.

    It doesn't foster conversation or even arguments of the less polite type when someone is always out there thinking their political opponents are child molesters. Yes, some things are beyond the pale. I'm not for banning people from saying them, but I am, and always will be, ready to call them on it whenever and wherever I see it. 

    What gives you the right to refer to another person's thinking that political opponents are child molesters is poisonous? To go around capricious calling people racist is just as poisonous. You are a hypocrite. Your "calling out" is merely an oxymoron for "I disagree" used for dramatic flair. 

     

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  10. 19 minutes ago, GOBUFFALO716 said:


    And you’re a moderator? No wonder people have no idea what is right and wrong here. 
     

    @SDS

    On other boards moderators are known and have a "moderator" designation under screen name. They should be involved in the discussion. Who complains should be known to all.

  11. I thought of DR as the PPP version of Rush Limbaugh providing tons of information, together with great analysis. He is not confrontational but is constantly bullied and provoked. 

    It seems like a war with casualties. Strategy is to take out the strongest and the rest will fall.

    Forbidden words and thought Chinese style.  And to think, the Biden family is already on the payroll.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  12. 1 hour ago, Dragoon said:

    I’m ok with Trump having Covid. Really. 
    I mean....in about 45 days I’ll be able to tell Liberals how Trump beat Covid and the Biden-MSM ticket within a matter of days. So, I got that going for me. 

    It is perfectly fine for Trump to hide out in WR Hospital while Biden hides out in basement. At this point more is accomplished in hospital than on the campaign trail. He is insulated from the MSM collecting sympathy. 

    Chickens hide,  but wounded go to hospital.

  13. 37 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
    Quote

    By the way, I don't know if people are that familiar with Walter Reed. It is the former Bethesda Naval Medical Center, basically sharing the NIH campus. (I lived on that campus for a while ... no, I wasn't sick ... it's a long story.)

    Trump is there suffering from an Infectious Disease. 
    Guess who the head of the NIAID is. He is not anyone's attending physician, but ... he is kind of the captain of the ship.

    The point is what? China flu, High ranking Doctor, so what?

    Quote

    Look, when someone posts a blanket statement like "You idiot, still trusting the MSM" (I've been the recipient of a few of those), it is clearly relevant to figure out why someone believes the mainstream media is engaged in an all-out fraud on the public.

     

    Your camp loves MSM, which does not report news, but propagandizes it. The other camp sees through it, but you apparently do not. Why they believe it encompasses a body of many years of exposure to MSM.

    Clearly you have a man crush on DR which IMO occasionally crosses the line and I am calling you out on it. @%#

  14. 58 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    And DR, stop trying to conceal your true beliefs. We all know what you were up to on your, umm, "hiatus" from this board, completing an, err, "work project" on the Mickey Say Go day you just posted about this week.

    You think you are so smart with your coy remarks. You are a cyber bully who has no filter. You should take a umm, "hiatus" from this board and go play with your self.

  15. 3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    I'm changing my tack.

    Yeah, damn right, we're the deep state and we will crush you like the cockroaches you are!

     

    TFR is a psycho. He needs to present himself as smarter, more educated, more everything in his quest for adulation, probably because of a repressed  inferiority complex.. He demands attention all the while claiming the moral authority to "call out" and insult others.

     

    Quote

    And what is your formal training in Marxist political theory and critical race theory? 
    I have had more than my fair share at the graduate level

     

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  16. Biden calling servicemembers "stupid bast****," unlike the anonymously sourced and widely debunked story in The Atlantic that claimed President Trump referred to fallen US soldiers in World War One as "suckers" and "losers." Other people with the president that day and willing to go on the record said the Atlantic story wasn't true, including former National Security Adviser John Bolton who recently wrote a book attacking Trump.

  17. 2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

    She assumed Hillary would be elected and her husband originally appointed her to the Supreme Court despite her older age.  The perfect story.  It's as simple as that.  I don't know if she was incapable of doing her job but she absolutely should've retired before 2014.

    Of course she thought Hillary would win, as did almost the whole country. The thought of law clerks making decisions is scary except they just had to follow the liberal playbook. No thinking allowed. She was a rubber stamp, as Biden would be. Funny how her hubris will cost her cause after calling Trump a faker. Payback is sweet.

    https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/12/politics/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-faker/index.html

    "He is a faker," she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. "He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."

     

  18. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/501295-democrats-threatening-impeach-trump/

     

    "RBG, who was 87, lived a long life and served the liberal agenda well, but let’s be honest, even in this mourning period: Ginsburg brought this situation on herself. If you will recall, during Obama’s last term, Democrats urged RBG to retire so he could appoint her replacement. She refused, and set up this situation on her death.

    She did not want the current president to choose her seat, so, instead of doing the right thing by resigning for health reasons, she hung in there until the bitter end. What an incredibly selfish person. She should have retired years ago. She took her wage from the taxpayers while her law clerks made critical decisions as she, in her 80s, underwent cancer treatment.

    She held one of the most critical positions in the land, but was perhaps the least competent and fit justices over the past four years. Yet the leftists in the media and the Democratic Party propped her up and made her out to be a saint. Never mind that she was sick and incapable of doing her job – just strap her to her seat and let the law clerks do the rest."

     

    Russia Today is often more informative than our own MMM.

     

    • Like (+1) 2
  19. 58 minutes ago, B-Man said:

    THE OLD-FASHIONED Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 

    ""Most of what I know about writing I learned from her.  The rules are actually pretty simple:  Every word matters.  Don't make the simple complicated, make the complicated as simple as it can be (but not simpler!). You're not finished when you can't think of anything more to add to your document; you're finished when you can't think of anything more that you can remove from it. She enforced these principles with a combination of a ferocious—almost a terrifying—editorial pen, and enough judicious praise sprinkled about to let you know that she was appreciating your efforts, if not always your end-product. And one more rule: While you're at it, make it sing. At least a little; legal prose is not epic poetry or the stuff of operatic librettos, but a well-crafted paragraph can help carry the reader along, and is always a thing of real beauty."

     

    I am now curious to read some of her writing. She never impressed me with her original thought.

    • Like (+1) 1
  20. 5 hours ago, Capco said:

    No, I think it's credible because experts in the relevant field believe it's credible:  

    Not only that, but you could also see her expertise throughout her comments. She was very brave and a role model for all survivors.

    If anything, the only reason you think she's not credible is because you don't want her to be.  

    My guess is you are a female. A male can sympathize with Kavanaugh's position of having to defend against some accusations made after many years by someone without corroboration who can not name where. Her politics align to the left as well. Conveniently she comes forward at confirmation hearings. A male could envision himself in such a horrible position, while a female is wired to  envision herself in Ford's position. To a male it looks like a hit job with a pay day.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  21. 8 minutes ago, Capco said:

    I did not say (or mean to suggest) that Kavanaugh (or Thomas) were not qualified jurists.  Both are superior in accomplishment to anything I will do in my legal career (probably, anyway). 

    Why would any poster want to identify themselves as a lawyer. It just opens up extra scrutiny for the competent usage of language and biased politics.

    Bork was a Constitutional scholar. He was over qualified for the Democrats, nothing sexual.

×
×
  • Create New...