T-Bomb
-
Posts
1,299 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by T-Bomb
-
-
Just now, Hebert19 said:
And if he ends up a career backup what then? Or if whoever we pick is next Tom brady?
This draft and his legacy will be like every other...judged in a few years.
The picks are not being made in a few years, they are being made in a matter of hours.
-
1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:
How is that relevant in any way to the current FO?
No, I don't.
Then I guess you're not a fan of the scientific method.
1 minute ago, TOboy said:You know what they say about opinions...
Yeah, that FO types the Bills have been hiring for the last 2 decades haven't had well informed opinions of prospective talent.
1 minute ago, Binghamton Beast said:You have no idea what the Jets want other than speculation from the media.
None at all.
And??? Why do you supposed I prefaced the statement with "I think".
-
4 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:
I thought you had a source?
I have the same source all of you have, a homo sapien sapien brain. More ppl need to learn how to use it in a non-lemming type fashion IMO.
-
3 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:
Oh, I don't know... starting a thread to call a GM a complete failure if he doesn't do what YOU what him to do?
It could qualify.....
Right, could qualify, but you'd have to see me at my desk typing, to know it it's a tantrum. You don't have enough empirical data to make the determination.
And before anyone says I don't have all the empirical data on whether Rosen will be great, don't be silly, you'd need a time machine for that, just like you would have for Brady.
Given the current data, I'm not sure how any FO would not have Rosen #1...
-
Just now, TOboy said:
If they go a different direction, we're going to have to trust them and give the guy a chance. It's not like this administration has failed repeatedly...
Not really, we don't have to trust them and give them a chance, how has that worked out the last couple decades?
-
2 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:
Not all fans throw childish temper tantrums based on a potential scenario.
Hmm, temper tantrum, yeah, that's it...
-
3 minutes ago, CajunBillsBacker said:
What if Rosen isn’t at the top of our draft board?
Then we have the wrong FO...
-
1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:
He wasn't hacked, but I think it's worth bearing in mind that these tweets are from 5 years back (2013), when he was what? a Sr in HS?
I personally think people are allowed to grow, change, and mature, including HS boys.
We are seeing yet another societal failure when it comes to social media...
Just wait until we all have a chip in our head, and we can all hear each others thoughts all the time. Everyone will be considered a racist, misogynist, yadda...
And no, no one is allowed to grow up and mature, 3rd wave feminist will tell you all boys are born rapists etc.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:
, declaring the GM a failure, prior to the draft, based on the speculation that he doesn't choose the player YOU want makes you sound a bit petulant...
Yeah, that's sports and sports fandom...
-
1 minute ago, kdiggz said:
what if Mayfield goes to the Browns and Darnold goes to the Jets? same outcome
I think the Jets want Rosen. The #3 spot should have been the Bills', Beane whiffed.
-
The move the Jets made weeks ago could have been "the move" of this draft. If Darnold doesn't go to the Browns, and Mayfield doesn't go to the Jets, the Bills are SOL.
Rosen is the ONLY answer to our QB problem of the last couple decades.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
38 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said:
I'm sorry, you are who again to decided how invested people get in this?
You seem angry...
If people get "invested" in something some random person on a random forums says, it speaks to the societal problem that is plaguing this country. (And why we have the political system we have, among other issues)
If you got invested, and are angry, you have no one but yourself to blame for getting invested to the level you did based on the information available.
-
3 hours ago, BillsFan17 said:
Funny you want folks to re-evaluate, yet you are using a message board as some sort of social experiment? And this is what you consider "fun." Tell me more about needing to re-evaluate one's self...
I will say, how enlightened you are is so refreshing.
Yes it is fun, because this is not serious stuff. It's not supposed to be serious, yet I think for way too many ppl it is...
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Reed83HOF said:
BTW I wasn't calling you out or asking who your source is. Just want to know if you feel that your source is very reliable on this, as it is enormous news...
OMG, you should be calling me out, that was the exercise... A public service if you will.
The gullibility of some (I mean most?) people is what allows them to be steered by the media, and increasingly social media. Especially political pundits.
Yes, I'm having fun at the expense of gullible Bills fans. If that makes you angry, I dunno, you need to re-evaluate how you personally sleuth for truth and facts in your daily lives.
I don't want Darnold anyways, I want Rosen. Don't need to get to #1 for Rosen.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, CNYfan said:
T-Bomb is risking everything.
His sound rating all on the line.
Going to Number 1 to draft Darnold.
Either Leroi or Dunkirk Don, which will it be?
Go big or stay home.
-
Just now, Perk71 said:
He hasn't answered anyone questioning him yet...hmmm
All I can say is, all will be revealed soon.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
I know that’s kind of my point though. Bills roster has become pretty aweful. Three solid o line starters who basically made the running game work are gone. RB is 30, need talent at DT, DE, WR and linebacker situation is not good on top of that is the huge QB problem.
outside of a very good secondary, this team needs major help.
When you surrender that many picks, how do you fix these things?
So im all for getting a good QB, but ya gotta do it responsibly and take some calculated risks to ensure the team gets some much need talent in the other spots.
No, that's how you don't get a franchise QB for 22 seasons...
-
5 minutes ago, Logic said:
Sorry to rain on everyone's parade, but team executives don't load up a plane and go to another team's headquarters just to talk trade. Why would they do that? What could be accomplished in person that couldn't be accomplished over the phone?
Silliness.Pegula does things a bit differently...
-
1 minute ago, Awwufelloff said:
Browns want Darnold.
Nope, they got Taylor because they have always wanted Allen.
The Bills may announce Darnold as the pick before the draft even starts.
-
Just now, Awwufelloff said:
No way the Browns trade #1.
Browns want Allen, Jets do not want Allen, they want Rosen.
It's pretty simple. Browns get the QB they want to sit behind Taylor for 1 season at #4, AND they get a crapload picks this year AND the Bills' #1 next year.
It will be sickening to lose all those picks tbh, this better work...
-
Just now, Awwufelloff said:
This is the biggest news by far. Why would he be flying to Cleveland the night before the draft. This is HUGE. I think Beane and company have tried to get Cleveland to trade pick 4 for awhile to no avail so they decided to meet up in person to try to convince them.
This is for #1, not #4...
Say goodbye to a boatload of picks and next years #1.
-
1 minute ago, Hurricane said:
Wouldn't they all be in Dallas by now?
No, the war rooms are not in Dallas.
-
2 minutes ago, kdiggz said:
Possibly but I doubt it. I hope it's not pick 1 because it would be for Sam Darnold and that's waaaay too much to give up for him
I'm hearing Pegula is instructing Beane to simply get it done, whatever it takes. The picks won't matter if Darnold is great.
Browns want Allen, they know it makes no sense to take him at 1.
I won't like losing next years #1...
-
2 minutes ago, kdiggz said:
High level business meetings with the Browns regarding pick 4
My info says pick #1.
-
1
-
1
-
If the Jets get Rosen tonight, Beane failed
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I do agree with that, however, you have to actually pick a guy. And you obviously do not have the benefit of hindsight.