Jump to content

Bigfatbillsfan

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bigfatbillsfan

  1. Hey smartass, I know what I can look up in the dictionary. The difference between attain and obtain is minimal at best. The difference between "atain and obtain is great. Why mention procure and create? I certainly didn't address that and don't need someone who has a problem creating a coherent sentence lecturing me. You are playing in a different league now fatty, sharpen the skates.

     

    Oh my god... I'm so scared. I think I might have just crapped in my pants. (sarcasm included)

     

    As far as I can tell atain isn't even a word.

     

    Yeah I'm starting to realize I'm in a different league... with people that don't even have an argument, don't know what the hell they're talking about half the time, and when that is pointed out to them have nothing to offer but mindless insults.

     

    Yeah, I didn't understand what "procure" meant.

     

    I couldn't have possibly been pointing out that all the searching in the world isn't going to find a job IF THERE'S NO JOBS TO BE HAD.

    Jesus Christ...is everyone a !@#$ing idiot today? :rolleyes:

     

    And the few jobs that are available will fall out of the sky and drop in your lap if you don't go out and look for them. That was J8's point.

  2. I was very sarcastically replying to your implication that all participants in this thread must be illiterate morons of the highest degree. Why else would you have bothered to explain the tricky distinctions between everyday words like attain and create, or provided us with an 8th grade interpretation of how higher employment levels may affect aggregate demand? I thought the last sentence, especially the part about remedial economics, was sort of a giveaway as to what I was going for. Not sure how much clearer I could have made that without pulling a page out the DC Tom playbook. Sorry for the subtlety, but its the holiday season and those royalties are killing my budget.

     

    I'm sorry, you must not have seen the post were DC claimed that job searches create jobs after J8 used the work procure. To me that says that he doesn't understand what the word procure means. I make no implication that you or anyone here was a moron.

  3. You're going to have to explain how employed consumers, spending money, increases aggregate demand, because that theory sounds pretty far fetched. Call me old fashioned, but I subscribe to Donner economics whereby anyone who can't keep up is ground into meat to support those of us who can still hack, and that's the way it'll be until someone can put something else out there that makes a shred of sense.

     

    But seriously, thanks for that eloquent explanation. It will be very useful for those of us that missed the first day of remedial economics.

     

    I'm not quite sure where AD locks into job creation. If your point is that with more people working with buying power will increas prices and keep demand static I don't think that will work.

    If we produce more demand there will have to be more production so even if prices rise the rise in buying power will off set it.

  4. Job searches create jobs. That's brilliant.

     

    Number eight.

     

     

    What he was was Job searches eventually bring job procurment. Procurment is ataining a job not creating a job. Though I agree that ataining a job does not create jobs directly remember that putting someone to work is going to create more demand now that they can afford to buy product and services. The more people find jobs the more demand for goods and services the more jobs have to be created to keep up with demand. Thats idea behind keeping people afloat during hard times.

  5. You truly are an ass and I'm pretty sure a longer term poster here using an alias. I stated in the OP that I wasn't sure if the story was true or not. Does it really matter? The sentiment is what counts. Regardless, Snopes merely calls it a legend. Do you think that grade averaging would be a good thing?

     

    Let me see if I can explain this to you again. What the professor was calling socialism was in fact communism. They are not the same thing. That's the part of the OP that I take issue with.

     

    No, I don't think grade sharing is a good thing but that is not socialism to begin with. Grade sharing would be more in the realm of communism. Socialism would be the fact that all the students have access to the teacher. Like I said. They are not the same thing.

     

    Is this an example of your "heightened" brand of wisdom? :lol:

     

    Did I say it was?

  6. Well fatty, you haven't disputed anything. I said it could be true or maybe wasn't, but it described you lefties very well. Regardless, if you don't see the wisdom in the OP you're an idiot and !@#$ing moron in addition to being a mudgeon to the third letter of mudgeonry.

     

    Wow, someone has some issues. You may want to talk to your doctor about Xanax.

     

    I am disputing something in your post. What the "college professor" was describing was not socialism. It was communism. They are not the same thing. I would tell you to look it up, but considering you didn't bother to find out if your E-mail was even true I would say it's safe to say that you wouldn't bother.

     

    And remember to talk to your doctor about that Xanax. It'll make you feel better.

×
×
  • Create New...