Jump to content

FleaMoulds80

Community Member
  • Posts

    693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FleaMoulds80

  1. I find it comical that he's not considered a number 1. It sounds like some of the posters here that claim he's not a number 1 because he doesn't put up Larry Fitzgerald or Calvin Johnson numbers.

     

    Andre Reed was a number 1, he should be in the HOF and Stevie is quickly entrenching himself as possibly the best Bills receiver in history. When all is said and done, I have no doubts he will be.

     

    True that. Totally agreed. Give Stevie a legit QB and see what kinda stats he puts up. Believe that!

  2. The great thing is everyone agrees its Moulds, but this thread still has spawned heated arguments. Even when we agree, we disagree.

     

    kj

     

    Cuz this was a stupid comparison in the first place. Now if he compared Moulds or Stevie, that would've been a MUCH more interesting debate.

  3. Well, you can go ahead and crunch the numbers if you like. But your claim above is categorically false. We did not throw the ball just as many times then as we do now--particularly when you look at passes as percentage of plays. But whatever.

     

    WTF are you talking about? Just look at the number of pass attempts. Not really a difficult concept to grasp.

  4. I

    Iquote name='FleaMoulds80' timestamp='1366299736' post='2783330']

    Great. We look awesome in practice. Doesn't mean anything if we can't transition that onto Sundays. I won't get excited about anything til I see something on Week 1.

     

    I remember a lot of fools here were giddy during OTAs and minicamp, then we got CRUSHED by Sanchez and the Jets. We made Sanchez look like Drew Brees out there. All this excitement doesn't mean squat until they produce in reg. season.

    /

     

    quote]

     

    I don't remember many giddy posts pre-season last year. In fact, I thought that the team consistently looked like crap in practice reflecting the personality of a lost, in-over-his-head HC.

     

    Maybe you're memory goin

  5. Then you would be crazy. ;)

     

    You win in the NFL with QBs, good coaching, and star players surrounded by good players. That 2010 team had no stars. Mario and CJ are stars. Lynch may be now but he wasn't then and wasn't likely going to be in Buffalo where he hated being here. Byrd may be a star now but he was there then, too, if you want to count him. Both lines were bad on that team, even with Levitre and Wood and Kyle Williams. Schobel was gone and not coming back. Stevie may not have become what he is without Gailey. There is no question at all this team is far better than the team Nix inherited.

     

    Truth

  6. Moulds at his best was a far better player than Stevie, who also happens to be a good player. Moulds at his best was a dominant player.

     

    I totally disagree but what else is new. Obviously I was a big Moulds fan but Stevie is just a better WR. He's done more with less athletic ability and less talent at the QB position than Moulds has done. Stevie has done it all by himself.

     

    BOOM!

     

    Like I said. That's a bogus argument. The Bills have chucked the ball as many times now than we have back then. Mould's best year, we threw the ball 600 times. We have NEVER thrown that many passes in the Stevie era. That's a bullsh*t argument.

     

    Moulds best year came in 2002, where we had 612 pass attempts. Just sayin...

  7. Also, a lot of people like to point to SJ's three consecutive 1,000 yard seasons (in the most pass-heavy era the league has ever known), while Moulds was 102 yards away from FIVE consecutive 1,000 yard seasons, back when it was a run-first league.

     

    That is such a bogus statement. We threw the ball just as many times back than, than we do now. Just because other teams chuck the ball more doesn't necessarily mean we did.

     

    Don't take anything away from Stevie

  8. I'm sure you watched a ton of Miami of Ohio and Delaware games for a couple years and know how those WRs rated versus their competition. Give me a break. Not to mention that there has been 12,738 players who were great in college who couldn't be great in the pros.

     

    WTF is your argument? Word of advice. When you say something. Make sure there's a point to what you say.

     

    Just because a college football team is good or has weapons doesn't mean anything. There is absolutely no relationship between the 2. A QBs success at the next level is dictated on him and him alone.

     

    Why is it that guys like Ken Dorsey and Gino Torretta dominated college football but couldn't do jack in the NFL, whereas average college QBs like Drew Brees and Tom Brady excelled at the next level?

×
×
  • Create New...