Red Squirrel
-
Posts
203 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Red Squirrel
-
-
I hate !@#$ing Flutopians. Die.
God, you are a classless fool.
-
Dilfer didn't lose. Flutie did, in often aggravating fashion. The Titans would have made the mighty midget look silly.
Dilfer did a TON of losing, often in embarrassing fashion, until he came to a team that had an historically great defense. In '99, if you did actually watch, you would know that we had a very good D. Not a single, living, breathing soul has ever claimed it was historically great.
We will never know how Flutie would have done against the Titans. I thought Johnson showed more in that game than he did in those week 17 blowouts that I'm sure you loved/were hoodwinked by...and as we all know, we had the game won until David Boston's incompetent father didn't get himself in position to see the illegal forward pass. Being that I am honest and don't come here to give smartass one line answers, I can admit that I have doubts the game would have been any different with Flutie...but I have little doubt that there were MANY losses after that game that would not have happened if Flutie had played.
-
The stats bear that out. The Bills' offense averaged 25 PPG in 1998 and then 20 PPG in 1999. The defense however went from 20.8 PPG allowed in 1998 to 14.3 in 1999.
I guess the fact that Eric Moulds was injured in the 6th game, missed two weeks and played hurt the remainder of the season had nothing to do with that drop. The game Moulds was injured in and the two he missed were the three worst games of the season for Flutie. To make matters worse, in two of those three games, the defense was a no-show; the third was a win against the Ravens, who actually defended Flutie ten times better than Parcells and Belichick ever did...until the last minute. Flutie got ripped for that performance; he had a 32.8 QB rating that probably was in single digits until the last play of the game...little did we know at the time, that Ravens D was on the verge of being one of the best in the history of the league.
It also didn't help having Thurman miss most of the season. And even though he was way past his prime at that point, it left them with out-of-shape underachiever Antowain Smith, and untalented Jonathan Linton....not exactly two appealing options. The team finished 8th in the league in rushing with those two averaging 3.7 and 3.4 a carry; take Flutie's rushing stats away, and they drop about 10 places.
And also, Andre Reed was running on fumes; he spent the 2nd half of the season feuding with the coaches about losing playing time to Peerless Price. And even though I was disappointed in Andre for lashing out at Flutie late in the year, I agreed with his beef with the coaches because Price was absolutely horrible at fighting for balls in traffic.
I don't really relish getting into these arguments 11 years after the fact, but come on! You guys should have learned you were wrong about Flutie no later than the end of 2000; if somehow it escaped you at that time, it should have happened by the end of 2001. But here we are after 8 more years of misery, and you guys are still ripping the last decent QB we had. I get that he isn't Kelly; if someone came on here and claimed that he was better than Jimbo, then I'd agree that was nutty. That has NEVER happened, and the bashing is just so absurd that every once in a while I have to get on here and take it on.
-
There were aspects of TO's game that disappointed me; he just wasn't as tough or as physical as I remember him being, and we all know his hands have been erratic for several years. But the guy did show he can still run and is still capable of big plays. While I understand and accept why he isn't a Bill anymore, I also have to say that if anything were to happen to Evans, I'd be a little bit annoyed if Nix didn't try to bring Owens back.
-
Not saying at all Edwards will be close to Kelly, but if this message board existed in '88, people would have been screaming to cut Kelly. And Moulds after his first 2 seasons.
Patience is dead.
Well, I'm not saying the Jonas Brothers will be close to the Beatles, but if "Beatles For Sale" were released today, critics would kill it.
Well, actually they wouldn't, and we all know they wouldn't.
Yes, patience is dead. And yes, Moulds would have gotten slaughtered by fans here after his first two seasons (he actually did get slaughtered by Bills fans on usenet, which was a pretty wild place to discuss the Bills back then). There should be a rule along the lines of Godwin's Law to keep people from making any comparison between Edwards and Kelly.
-
I think this is spot on. What is more telling about the 2008 season is the total and historic collapse after the first six games. Jauron's teams in Buffalo simply never finished well - whether it is finisihing a season, or finishing a game. He was easy to beat by competent coaches on the opposing sidelines and his players may have tried hard but were poorly conditioned and poorly prepared to deal with adversity. (the term "weak willed" comes to mind) Those traits were regular as clockwork. A competent head coach was probably worth at least 2 or 3 wins in each of the past 4 years - perhaps more - even with some of the obvious holes in talent.
I like what I see from Nix and Gailey so far with respect to both filling the talent holes and properly preparing the team. We will soon see. (can't come fast enough)
I like it when people agree with me
, but I don't entirely agree with you . Like I said to DrFishfinder, that "historic collapse" was mostly because the schedule was front-loaded with garbage. I'm not a Jauron fan, but you are laying it on real thick here. I think they dealt with adversity pretty well the one year when they had about 25 guys on IR, and I don't think all those injuries were because of poor conditioning....most of the time, injuries are a result of bad luck, and it slays me that nobody wants to admit this. Folks just have to blame somebody. I'm also a Mets fan, and NOBODY is going to tell me that several guys who played 155+ games, some for YEARS, all of the sudden were betrayed by their conditioning/trainers/medical staff. That stuff was just plain bad luck. When it isn't bad luck is when you go out and sign or draft guys who already have a track record of unreliability. Conditioning... (where's the smiley that's giving the raspberry?). My single biggest beef with Jauron is the rare occasion I agree with the masses...he coached not to lose. If "Prevent Defense" were personified, it would look exactly like Dick Jauron. -
It's not uncommon for concussion side effects to take a while to kick in. Edwards was never the same afterwards, except for the SD game.
A brief statistical analysis of Trent's 2008, pre- and post-concussion: he had a 93.9 QB rating before it (admittedly pretty good), 81.3 after (not exactly cratering). Almost none of that difference comes from completion percentage (66.4 pre, 65.1 post), which is where I would expect to see a difference if he was having post concussion symptoms. Roughly half of the drop in QB rating came from getting picked off more often. Exactly where I would expect to find a difference due to playing better teams. Amazingly, he was sacked only one more time post-concussion, in 130 more attempts...another area where I would expect a brain-damaged player to get worse...but he didn't; he got MUCH better at avoiding sacks.
The concussion theory needs to die. He didn't have a drop off; the schedule got harder. The entire team found life much more difficult when they started playing teams that didn't suck. Which brings me back to the topic of the thread, Jauron: Trent's getting crunched in the noggin had nothing to do with DJ's downfall.
As I said before, you can't blame Jauron for all the bad things and refuse to give him any credit whatsoever for the good things. That's just not logical. And I'm no Jauron apologist.I hope I didn't sound like that. I liked him as a hire, I thought the team played pretty hard for him, and I think some of the criticism of him (and the team in general) tries pretty hard to have it both ways: he's an idiot, but boy, do those players stink...well, either one of those things is completely wrong, or both of them are overblown to varying degrees. Or else we'd be the Detroit Lions.
The Bills also lost to Cleveland.Yes, they did. If this is supposed to show Trent's diminished capacity, then what about Denver? Are we now going to pick each game and if he sucked, THOSE are the games when he had side effects?
-
In 2008, when the Bills were 5-1, if Edwards hadn't started showing the effects from the concussion and the injuries hadn't continued to mount game after game after game, could the Bills have made a playoff run? Most of the sports writers had the Bills as the team to beat in the AFC East. Edwards was rated in the top 5 or 6 QB's in the league. Jauron just was not able to get the team back in the groove once the injuries started piling up. I'm really not sure any HC could have, given those circumstances.
For as much as I've criticized Jauron, in all fairness he did have the team playing well for a six game period. The reason I say "he had the team playing well" is because it's not reasonable or logical to dump all the of the blame for the lack of success on him and at the same time, refuse to give him any credit whatsoever for the successes the team did have. My personal opinion is that the FO kept hanging onto the retrospective false hope that somehow, Jauron could recreate the formula that produced the brief period of success. Finally, the FO decided that was not going to happen, cut Jauron and here we are.
I guess the "Edwards Concussion Theory" is like Rasputin...you just can't kill it. This isn't the first time I've tried, as have others.
Is it possible that Edwards' concussion had lingering effects? Only he can know for sure. But the rest of us have to go with the evidence:
Cumulative record of the teams the Bills faced in first 4 games: 16-48
Edwards best game of the season almost definitely was his first one AFTER the concussion vs SD.
Common sense tells me the concussion didn't mean squat. By the time they started losing, he'd had 3 weeks to recover, and in the meantime had one pretty good game against a far tougher opponent than the first 4.
As far as the Jauron stuff goes, I think you put way too much stock on those 6 games, and have projected it onto the FO. I think a more realistic way of looking at it was that they always seemed close to turning a corner. We all know about the 7-9, three straight years...you only have to reverse a couple games a year (and Lord knows, there were a number of gut wrenching close ones in the Jauron years) and you have at the very least a team that is vying for a playoff spot.
-
The CFL has been around for a long time. There was a time, especially before the rise of the AFL and while the NFL itself was smaller, less lucrative, less organized/competitive when a fair number of top player talent made it to Canada. Cookie Gilchrist and others are CFL legends that were good enough to play anywhere. Even more recently, for one reason or another, the occasional great player shows up here, e.g. Warren Moon because back when he graduated the NFL was still in the dark ages re drafting a black QB (even if the guy was great) or Jeff Garcia and a few others, including Flutie who after all was a real QB and not an imposter at the position even in the NFL. Most recently there is Wake, who will only get better in Miami (though of course will not dominate as he did in Canada).
Rickie Williams is an interesting case for comparison. When he played for Toronto he was not as effective as he is in Miami. To me he was just playing out his suspension and keping in shape - maybe at 80% of capacity. Even then, when he made his mind up he could put it in a different gear. I remember him with a defensive tackle draped all over him at the opposition five yard line. He literally walked in with the guy on his back. He's a tough runner but he doesn't do that in the NFL.
The CFL is fun for us Canadians to have, but it is definitely the minor leagues. Even more so than in baseball since its sends fewer players to the "majors". Talentwise, if the Bills played here they would/should go undefeated and win the Grey Cup (although with them you never know- its hard to win in the CFL).
With its three down set the game is more simplified and together with the wider field is more open and pass oriented. It is less sophisticated and technical from the perspective of execution though and there are some things about it that are downright stupid. The difference between victory and defeat can be a punt through the end-zone - the infamous "rouge"- hilarious.
Great post. I can remember back when my cable company first got ESPN (1981, I think), they were all over the CFL because the Alouettes had signed Ferragamo, Overstreet, and a receiver from the Bears whose name escapes me. They had some bird brain for an owner who thought he could singlehandedly lift the status of the league to the NFL level. But Ferragamo tanked (just like with the Bills), the Alouettes were awful, and all three players came back to the NFL with their tails between their legs.
The guy that I really liked in that era was Condredge Holloway. That guy was an awful lot like Flutie. He was short and could scoot. He had fantastic field vision; the Argos ran the Run-and-Shoot, and he spread the ball all over the field, and he had great timing for when to go long. I looked his numbers up, and he really only had one huge year. But pretty much every year he had more TDs than INTs, and always had impressive yards per attempt. I think he could have crossed over to the NFL if they weren't so hung up on size. He certainly could have been an upgrade over the clowns that passed through Buffalo between Ferguson and Kelly.
-
Tom Cousineau is the biggest bust all-time for the Bills. He was the #1 overall pick, which we traded OJ Simpson to San Fran for. He refused to play for the Bills. Instead, he bolted to Canada for 3 years. When he tried to return to the NFL, the Oilers tried signing him where the Bills matched the offer then proceeded to trade him to the Browns where he was good but not great. What we did get for him is the 14th overall pick in the 1983 draft, which I think turned well as we picked a man by the name of Jim Kelly.
Upon further review, Ralph Wilson and the GM of the day were pretty retarded. They refused to fly up his agent and key executives were not there to greet him when he arrived in Buffalo. This in no way changes his stature as the biggest bust in franchise history.
Ironically, I think you defeat your own argument. Essentially, the Bills traded two years of a worn-out OJ for Jim Kelly. The only problem is the eight years in between....which was mitigated by also receiving a 2nd round pick in 1980 for OJ, which became Joe Cribbs. They got several other picks for OJ, too. We politely won't mention who they were
-
Erik Flowers, Mike Williams, John McCargo(he was a first and a third round pick), JP Losman, Dwight Drane(1984), Tony Hunter
Maybin would has a long way to go to be as bad as this bunch
Dwight Drane?
-
When talking about whether or not a player is a bust early in his career, I also think - what would that player look like somewhere else? Sometimes it is more a good fit than necessarily an overall bust. I could imagine Rex Ryan getting his hands on Maybin last year, using him as a rush outside linebacker, and getting five, six sacks out of him. I'm not saying our coaching staff is inadequate at all, because it hasn't had a chance yet, but I'd say in the scheme of last year's Bills, trying to use Maybin as a DE was bound to be ineffective. He was just too small and inexperienced to go up against the blocking he faced.
Also considering he's only like 21 years old, he could blossom in a few years and still have a long career in front of him.
I really thought, last year, that we'd of drafted Orakpo. I was hoping for Orakpo or Everette Brown. So, just for the sake of evaluating my evaluating skills, I'm keeping an eye on those two to see how their careers fare against Maybin's.
Just like he did with Vernon Gholston?
-
Great post. You made me smile with the Ernie Davis and Carl Eller picks, I don't think they count.
But any post that sends me running to do research is a good one. Who the hell is Mike Dennis? Great stuff.
EDIT: Dennis was drafted by us, with the eight pick, in 1966, but didn't play till '68 - '69, and then for the Rams? Who the ...? What the ...?
I think you could count the guys who spurned the Bills for another league as busts, but at least they didn't cost any money.
Just a guess about Mike Dennis, since there is little info readily available on him....maybe he didn't play those two years because of the war. That is purely a guess, but the time frame matches up.
-
Well then, let me help you out.
In terms of the least amount of games The Bills ever got out of a First Round pick - here are the top 10:
FIRST PLACE - there's a three-way tie: Ernie Davis (yeah THAT Ernie Davis) and Carl Eller (yeah THAT Carl Eller) both were drafted but said screw you to The Bills and went to play in the NFL. Actually, Ernie died before he paid a game for Cleveland. Jim Davidson was the other player drafted in the first who never played for the club.
SECOND PLACE - Mike Dennis - played 15 games
THIRD PLACE - Phil Dokes - played 22 games
FOURTH PLACE - Perry Tuttle - played 24 games
FIFTH PLACE - JP Losman - played 41 games as a Bill
SIXTH PLACE - - Terry Miller - played 48 games
SEVENTH PLACE - Tie: Mike Williams - played 51 games as a Bill as did Booker Moore
All of the above were picked in the First Round by The Bills.
For the record, Erik Flowers played 58 games and McCargo 39 - but he's still on the team and was a wash much of his rookie year and his position coach had.......
Flowers played only 31 games with the Bills. Not sure why you count only Bills games for other players, but all NFL games for him.
-
If the question is just, "Who is the biggest 1st round bust", without adjusting for where they were picked in the 1st round, Flowers is on top of my list. And I say that reluctantly, as an ASU fan. I suppose because of following that program, I thought it was predictable that he'd lay an egg. His performance was nothing special at ASU until the end of his senior year. I believe he was playing at around 220. Then, all of the sudden, he blew up. Next thing you knew, he's 250 and racking up 3 or 4 sacks at the senior bowl. Then, he's even heavier at the combine and somehow hasn't lost any speed. I don't know what is more mysterious
; how he achieved this, or why guys who were actually good at their job...this was pre-Donahoe...didn't have suspicions. Even if you are sure he was clean, you can't ignore the fact that he didn't play like a 1st rounder in college, and it was probable that he wouldn't continue to run like a 220 pounder.I have a tough time rating Mike Williams as big a bust as Flowers, but I can see the point when you consider how high a 1st round pick he was. He and some of the others, like Patulski, at least hung around for a while.
I may have missed it, but I don't think I have seen the name Perry Tuttle in this thread. He was the 19th pick in '82, and he did turn into a good player...for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers.
-
I always get a chuckle when the "we should have gone for Jason Campbell" threads start. People who look at the stat sheet like Campbell. People who watch Redskins games know better. The guy can't come through in the clutch. He's great against prevent D when his team is down three scores, and he's not bad between the 20s, but he SUCKS in the red zone. Why in God's name would the Redskins drop a young, up and coming, ever improving QB for an injury prone old-guy?
On another note, Campbell gets the perpetual pass on his shortcomings because of the shuffling of O.C.s he's played under. I rarely hear the same considerations made for TE.
You cannot be serious. This is one of MANY excuses made for TE. It might not be #1 on the list, but it's up there.
-
I've got two; 1st is 1980, Bills vs Jets at Shea Stadium. When we could see the stadium from the car, it was 3 hours before the game....we missed about 5 minutes of the first quarter because of massive traffic. Shea was just horrible for football. Because it was round, half the "good" seats were 12 miles from the field. And we had bad seats...the open-end end-zone, where the Mets eventually put their picnic section. These were temporary, wooden bleachers....the type you see at your local high school. It was rainy and cold, and the wood soaked up all the water. No vendors came to that area, and bathrooms were nowhere near us. Dimwitted Jets fans (are there any other) just waltzed up from their assigned seats in the back rows and stood in front of us....until shoved out of the way. But the day turned out pretty good. Fergy hit Frank Lewis for a game winning 31 yd TD with about :15 left. And the play happened right in front of me, and was the only thing that happened the whole game that I saw clearly.
The second one is Sun Devil Stadium in Tempe, late '90s. People around the country have no idea what a decrepit old dump that place is. It is passable for college games, especially for ASU students who paid less than $40 for season tickets. But at NFL prices, you need better than metal bleachers that reach a temperature of 9000 degrees on a September afternoon. You need better concessions. You need bathrooms that when you walk into them you aren't ankle deep in mystery liquid. It was still a better place to watch a game than Shea, however.
-
For the record, Matt Moore was a UFA, Tyler Thigpen was a 7th round pick and Derek Anderson was a 6th rounder. None of them made it past all 31 other teams when put on waivers as rookies.
In Tom Brady's rookie year the Patriots kept 4 QBs because they didn't want to risk trying to sneak him onto the practice squad and someone claiming Brady on waivers.
All good examples to back up your point. Each situation is different; I have no recollection of any of those guy's situations other than Brady's. To be clear, I can envision many scenarios where Levi makes the final roster. The one I am not buying is the one that involves a guy going from a battle for #1 to out the door.
-
.....I would almost bet you right now that when the season starts, barring injury, Fitz is #2 and Brown is #3 and #1 is anyone's guess. I'm predicting Edwards will win that battle but someone could get hurt, Brohm could surprise, etc.....
This is really the only part that I feel it is worth further debate. I just cannot envision a competition between 4 guys where only two are considered to be #1, and the loser of that gets whacked. And I also can't imagine why any of you think Brown could come in 4th behind a group of guys that everyone criticizes, after himself getting bypassed by every other team at least 6 times in the draft, and then be in such demand that the Bills couldn't pass him through waivers and assign him to the practice squad. That is all.
-
You guys are forgetting one essential element: a player, especially a guy like Fitz with glaringly limited upside, could easily have been the best QB on the Bills last year and still not even be considered to be the starting QB this year.
My comments reflect my opinions, backed up with some stats and some common sense. SJBF agreed with me. What you did is 100% opinion. But patronizingly telling us we are forgetting something is pretty rich. Continuing........
Fitz is a decent back-up QB in this league, and pretty much everyone knows it. He was signed to be the back-up and he knew he was going to be the back-up and one of the reasons he was signed was because he knew he was going to be the back-up and was okay with being the back-up. He has qualities that make him a back-up but pretty much eliminate him from being a good let alone great starter in the NFL.All 4 QBs on the Bills roster were originally signed or drafted to be back-ups, weren't they? But only Fitz shouldn't dare aspire to be a little bit more? Because....why? Oh, yeah. He's less accurate than Edwards...but don't let the fact that the difference in their completion percentage is eaten up by the difference in the percentage of times they get sacked....and that Fitz throws higher risk passes. You know those kind; they carry in the air past the 1st down marker!
So it wasn't at all surprising what he did, or how he played and yes, out-played Trent last year. One of the things he's good at is making things out of nothing in short bursts. That's what a back-up is supposed to do.This is kind of nonsensical. Fitz had one game when he came off the bench with little prep time either for him or for the opposition. He was terrible, but lucky for him, less terrible than his opposite number, ¡Sanchize! When he prepped and the other team had film on him, he was better. BTW, this was exactly the pattern for our best backup QB ever, Reich. he pretty much sucked when summoned in the middle of a game, but was damn near as good as Kelly when he had the full week to prepare.
There are many on this board, myself included, who think that Fitz pretty much has the back-up job sewn up, and the guy who loses the starter derby between Trent and Brohm could well be cut (because they are likely going to not want risking losing Brown to someone plucking him off the PS). Know why? Because Fitz is a decent back-up. That's what he is.I have heard this before, and it sounds like you are being fairer to Fitz than the guys who talk about him like he isn't fit to be an extra on Friday Night Lights. But it makes no sense! What you are saying boils down to this: the guy who was best last year should just be happy to be a back-up....the guy who possibly is your 2nd best QB should be whacked in favor of the guy you think is glaringly limited and another guy who they spent a measly 7th rd pick on. Once again...it makes no sense.
-
Wow, which Fitzpatrick did you watch last year? Maybe you just saw one out of 5 throws, the few good ones. Fitzpatrick has got to have the most inconsistent arm I've seen in years. One great throw, one wild miss, a wilder miss, nice catch by the receiver on that crap throw, and "where in the hell was he throwing that one?"
I like his intangibles, but the scatter shot he has for an arm drives me nuts, which isn't to say "Captain Checkdown" makes me feel much better.
You do realize that there was only 4% difference in completion percentage between the "scatter shot" guy and the guy who never attempts a pass more than 15 yards in the air, right? That doesn't quite jibe with the "1 in 5" crack, now, does it? And Fitz hit TO deep downfield in stride more times in 9 games than Trent has hit ANYONE, in stride or not, deep downfield in three years?
And while excuses up the wazoo have been made about the bad OL causing TE to constantly check down and turn the offense into a "3 and out" machine, you never seem to notice that a lot of Fitz' wild throws came a split second before he was going to get sacked. The 2nd Pats game was like that...and as you might recall, when Trent came in he tried to do the same thing. He ALSO missed receivers by a mile, when he managed to actually get a throw off. And I'll be nice and ignore the fact that both got hurt that game...one vanished, the other almost led a comeback in a game that looked REALLY hopeless.
And most importantly , you do realize that the guy who you prefer was 1-5, while Mr. Scatter-shot was 5-4, don't you?
I ask whether you know these things even though they have been posted MANY times before. It just doesn't sink in.
It seems to me that those who still think Edwards is the best choice just fundamentally view the game differently...they evaluate QBs based on best-case-scenario performances from his teammates. The best case never happens. You just never see a guy walk up to the line and repeatedly have 8 seconds to choose from 5 wide open receivers. Sometimes you have to improvise: change the play at the line....scramble a little bit....trust your receivers to make plays....DO SOMETHING.
I avoided getting involved in these discussions recently, but it just drives me nuts that folks never seem to learn. They always go for the guy that "looks" the right way. We even have some old proof of this in this thread, where someone is reminiscing about Collins....Jeezus, Collins was TERRIBLE. And he's started about 10 games in 12 years away from Buffalo, so it clearly wasn't just youth that held him back. But By God, he LOOKED like a QB, just like Johnson, just like Edwards.
Some of you will never learn.
-
Is this the game with the opening play bomb to Moulds which was completed and then fumbled?
Edit: Put two hands on the ball and quit carrying it like a loaf of bread!
I kinda felt that the problem was about 1/4 poor ball handling and 3/4 trying to run with his head spinning around like Linda Blair in The Exorcist.
-
I've never gotten all the hating on mullets. They beat faux hawks any day of the week, and NOTHING* is worse than a guy over the age of 11 with bangs.
*poster is getting a thin patch on the top of his noggin and has a feeling he'd settle for any hairstyle in 5
years provided the hair grew out of his own scalp.
-
So you're saying he can't grasp the fans prospective, because he is a player? You just keep blowing that ole TE horn. I find it ironic that he was offended about the California comment but not about Jimbo's insinuation that he sucks, and the team needs to move on. I'm glad he can count on your support, but I'm with Kelly. Also even though Brown is considered "rough", I wouldn't be surprised to see him start, as he is the type of QB Chan seems to prefer.
I don't know what the other guy is saying, but I'll come out and say that anyone who is bothered by that quote can't grasp context. It isn't Trent's job to think like a fan; his job is to play football.
I am not even a fan of the guy...I vote for Fitz in every one of the polls, and would pick Brohm second. But that is not the point. This "I'm not a fan of the team" garbage has to die.
The truth about Flutie !!!
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
So I guess it was the QB's fault when Darryl Stingley's neck was broken?