Jump to content

satchy

Community Member
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by satchy

  1. Long time lurker, had to respond to this thread. Agree with blue cheese, no contest, that’s my choice. However I was at the Anchor Bar downtown in 1980 (old fart), had the best wings I ever ate, size of chicken legs! No one would argue they invented the delicacy. But was surprised to see that the “inventors” served them with ranch dressing! Never saw that before that day. This wayyy pre-dated the current controversy. I still prefer blue cheese, but to claim that is the only “true Buffalo” way to serve them is probably inaccurate.

  2. Ranch anywhere near wings is sacrilege. I hope you agree. Ranch has it's place, but not near wings...

    My first trip to the Anchor Bar was in 1980, at the original Main street location. Yikes, where does the time go?! They served the biggest best wings I ever had...... and they served them with with ranch dressing! i was shocked. Not my first choice, but not sacrilege given it was the preferred dressing of the wing gods themselves.

  3. But that is the problem. There is no "right" here, at this point in time. Right implies certainty. We cannot be certain, when we are dealing with future prediction....otherwise, it wouldn't be prediction. We can NEVER be right at this point...which is why ESPN taking about "EJ is a wasted pick" is patently retarded. One should never over commit to a probability that is so nebulous/dependent on so many external factors. (I see this all the time in my job tho...)

     

    What we are dealing with is probability. There is a chance that Watkins fails. There is a larger chance that EJ fails. But, given the talent on the team, the largest chance is: next year's #1 was never going to be high enough to get a sure-fire 10 year answer at QB.

     

    Exactly like: the greatest chance for our 6th round pick...was to not make the team. So, you trade it away for Mike Williams.

     

    Given these realistic( :rolleyes::lol:) chances, you go with the thing that is most likely to yield success, but, you accept the fact that you can be wrong. That's it: there is a chance that this is a bad move, however, there is > chance it isn't, and the notion that we are giving away a chance at a viable QB solution next year? Barely a chance at all.

     

    Don't cloud my head with probability and statistics. I know what I know.

×
×
  • Create New...