Jump to content

Losman-McGahee-Evans

Community Member
  • Posts

    276
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Losman-McGahee-Evans

  1. Apr. 18 - The Buccaneers continue to talk to the Bills about running back Travis Henry, but they have competition. The Eagles are definitely a player in these trade talks and could take the lead if they wish, according to ESPN.com's John Clayton.

     

    Philly has enough draft choice clout to top the player-for-player options presented by the Bucs and Cardinals. Arizona is offering left tackle L.J. Shelton. The Bills want draft choices to be involved in any trade, and may favor something from the Eagles.

     

    ______________________________________

     

    All sounds good to me at the moment.

    307913[/snapback]

    If we pull this off and trade Clements for the no.9 pick and are able to trade down for another 2nd rounder I would dance a jig in myh boss's office wearing nothing but a jockstrap and a Bills football helmet.

     

    You've been warned.

  2. first you'd have to imagine we have no intention of re-signing NC or that TD & Co don't think he will re-sign

    then you'd have to imagine that Washington actually wants to make this trade

    then you'd have to imagine that there is nobody the Bills particulary want at #9.  if they made this trade i'd have to think there is somebody they have their eye on

    then you'd have to imagine that somebody would actually want to trade up.  and it looks like there are more teams wanting to trade down than up in this weak draft

     

    "could you imagine" posts are like that john lennon imagine song.  yeah, it sounds good but at some point you gotta smack that hippie upside the head with a dose of reality

    302021[/snapback]

    If a guy like Smith, Benson, or C Williams falls then people will want to trade up.

  3. Who could they be trading for?  Hopefully not Clements.

    PFW Mock Draft

    301335[/snapback]

    If we can swing this trade and possibly trade down, even trade out of the 1st round entirely if we get enough picks in return, then we can do more than draft for need. We can also draft players who could allow us to dump high-priced but average perfroming players on our roster which really makes us able to sustain a long run at the ring.

     

    Imagine if we trade down in the first for an extra 2nd rounder :

     

    01 - DT Travis Johnson (FSU)

    02 - OG Marcus Johnson (MIS)

    02 - CB Bryant McFadden (FSU)

    03 - TE Kevin Everett (MIA)

     

    Could you imagine?

  4. Please, I implore the rest of PPP to realise that LME is the only TRUE  Republican out there.

     

    Thank you. This message has been brought to you by the Bureau of the Department of Redundancy.

    285590[/snapback]

    Actually I'm not. If you look at the latest CBS poll you'll see it found that 82 percent of the public was opposed to Congress and the president intervening in this case; 74 percent thought it was all about politics. If you look at the ABC poll you see that :

     

    - 70% of Americans say it is inappropriate for Congress to involve itself in the Schiavo case.

     

    - 67% of Americans “think the elected officials trying to keep Schiavo alive are doing so more for political advantage than out of concern for her or for the principles involved.” (Just 19% believe the elected officials are acting out of concern for her or their principles.)

     

    - 58% of Republicans, 61% of independents and 63% of Democrats oppose federal government intervention in the case.

     

    - 50% of evangelicals oppose federal government intervention in the case, just 44% approve of the intervention.

     

    - 63% of Catholics and a plurality of evangelicals believe Schiavo’s feeding tube should be removed.

     

    The fact is that in three little paragraphs, Tom Delay has called the woman with a liquified cerebral cortex a gift from God, compared her situation to his own, and used her to uncover a vast left-wing conspiracy determined to topple Tom DeLay and the values of conservatism. If you're crazy enough to believe that's true then you'll never understand why this wrong.

     

    As far as being the only REAL Republican I've never claimed I was. I am indeed an ACTUAL Republican and its indisputable but don't worry about me. These are the folks you should be worrying about because they do think you're not a REAL Republican :

     

    "David Davenport of the Hoover Institute, a conservative research organization beleives that, "When a case like this has been heard by 19 judges in six courts and it's been appealed to the Supreme Court three times, the process has worked - even if it hasn't given the result that the social conservatives want. For Congress to step in really is a violation of federalism."

     

    Stephen Moore, a conservative advocate who is president of the Free Enterprise Fund, said: "I don't normally like to see the federal government intervening in a situation like this, which I think should be resolved ultimately by the family: I think states' rights should take precedence over federal intervention. A lot of conservatives are really struggling with this case."

     

    Some more moderate Republicans are also uneasy. Senator John W. Warner of Virginia, the sole Republican to oppose the Schiavo bill in a voice vote in the Senate, said: "This senator has learned from many years you've got to separate your own emotions from the duty to support the Constitution of this country. These are fundamental principles of federalism."

     

    "It looks as if it's a wholly Republican exercise," Mr. Warner said, "but in the ranks of the Republican Party, there is not a unanimous view that Congress should be taking this step."

     

    =====

     

    "My party is demonstrating that they are for states' rights unless they don't like what states are doing," said Representative Christopher Shays of Connecticut, one of five House Republicans who voted against the bill. "This couldn't be a more classic case of a state responsibility."

     

    "This Republican Party of Lincoln has become a party of theocracy," Mr. Shays said. "There are going to be repercussions from this vote. There are a number of people who feel that the government is getting involved in their personal lives in a way that scares them."

     

    =====

     

    You and these rapture fundamentalists that want to turn our country into a religious theocracy (Delay said so in FRIDAY) just like Iran are not Republicans. Republicans believe in seperation of powers and states rights. What is occuring here is the rapid destruction of the Republican party by a group of a$$ clowns who sold my once great party out to these religious zealots in order to benefit themsleves. On that they will easily marginalize my party and for what?

  5. This simply isn't a left/right issue, or even a Dem/Repub issue, but a world vs. a hijacked country/party issue. In that sense it reveals these folks as the farthest thing from a Republicna as one can imagine.

     

     

    The Terri Schiavo case is unbelievably complex, multilayered, too steeped in unknown or unknowable facts for me - indeed for most people - to have a fully informed opinion.

     

    I don't know - and neither do any of you - if Michael Shiavo is trying to murder his wife or trying to fulfill her stated wishes for just such a scenario. I don't know what Terri Schiavo would want - and neither do you - because she didn't tell us via a living will. We have only the word of her husband who assures us that his wife once said she wouldn't want to be kept alive this way, and we have her parents, who love their daughter and desire only to care for her.

     

    I do know that the Congress did the wrong thing, intervened where it had no Constitutional right, and solved nothing.

     

    I also know that this is not an act of principle but an act of political football with Terry being tossed around as such. It is absolutely immoral what is occuring here and as a party we are getting killed over this. Look no further than the poll numbers and you see that we truly are in serious trouble. Why? Because the majority of americans on do not agree with this because the more people see Terry the more people realize that they would want to be allowed to pass and they are repulsed that a government would shred the constitution and states rights to keep them alive in order to distract folks from a indictment of its majority leader that is comming any day and to have an issue to run on in 2006 because we lied to them about the social security "crisis", Iraq and that tax cuts would turn the economy around.

  6. Oh, the selective memory. Reagan ALSO initiated the single largest tax CUT, you buffoon.

     

    You're no Reagan republican. Hell, you're not even a Nixon or Ford republican.

     

    Keep deluding yourself, though. Just make sure you're on the Rainbow Coalition's mailing list. Wouldn't want to miss out on any important talking points.

    284524[/snapback]

    Selective memory? HOW ABOUT READING MY POST, RAY CHARLES?

     

    "After his first tax cut as President, Ronald Reagan signed into law THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN AMERICAN HISTORY. "

     

    The great thing about being told I'm not a Republican by you is that you're too ignorant to understand that I (Along with Reagan and Warner and McCain and Shays and others) are indeed Republicans. You're being led by a Federalist who is telling people that he's a Republican and you are too stupid to understand the difference between the two.

  7. no, what makes you not a real republican is you insistence that Tax and Spend philosophies are actually successful.

     

    That, you ignoramus, makes you a democrat.

     

    McCain is a Democrat in Republican's clothing. So much so the Dims actually WANTED him for a Veep candidate.

    284499[/snapback]

    Taxing and spending makes me a Democrat? After his first tax cut as President, Ronald Reagan signed into law THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN AMERICAN HISTORY. He's also a tax and spend Republican which I guess makes him a Democrat as well but only if you're a complete idiot who can't think past cliches like "tax and spend". McCain may be a Democrat in Republican clothing but HE REFUSED TO BE KERRY'S VP. Just because you are asked to kill someone doesn't make you a murderer does it? At least in your world it does.

  8. Maybe finally my party is beginning to realize that being the party that governs as a religious theocracy versus via the constitution will result in only short term victories while likely making us a minority extremist party for the long term.

     

    "Senator John W. Warner of Virginia, the sole Republican to oppose the Schiavo bill in a voice vote in the Senate, said: "This senator has learned from many years you've got to separate your own emotions from the duty to support the Constitution of this country. These are fundamental principles of federalism."

    "It looks as if it's a wholly Republican exercise," Mr. Warner said, "but in the ranks of the Republican Party, there is not a unanimous view that Congress should be taking this step."

     

    In interviews over the past two days, conservatives who expressed concern about the turn of events in Congress stopped short of condemning the vote in which overwhelming majorities supported the Schiavo bill, and they generally applauded the goal of trying to keep Ms. Schiavo alive. But they said they were concerned about what precedent had been set and said the vote went against Republicans who were libertarian, advocates of states' rights or supporters of individual rights.

     

    "My party is demonstrating that they are for states' rights unless they don't like what states are doing," said Representative Christopher Shays of Connecticut, one of five House Republicans who voted against the bill. "This couldn't be a more classic case of a state responsibility."

     

    "This Republican Party of Lincoln has become a party of theocracy," Mr. Shays said. "There are going to be repercussions from this vote. There are a number of people who feel that the government is getting involved in their personal lives in a way that scares them."

     

    This post is for people like Alaska Darin, JoeSixPack et al who loudly yell that I'm not really a Republican because I believe (Along with Sen. Warner, McCain and Rep. Shays and the other Republicans who voted against this) in REAL Republicna values and recognize that this is simply a party who is manipulating the emotions of a family for a brief political advantage. What the people who moronicly accuse me of not being a Republican don't realize is that as the American people read the GOP stategy memo on how to maximize the imapct of this stunt or hear the tape out today of Friday's conversation with evangelical big money donors saying that he "delivered the Schiavo girl for you now you've got to deliver help for my defense fund against the indictment when it comes (The grand jury indictment that is coming from the TRMPAC investigation)".

     

    It took us less than 10 years as the majority party to become more corrupt than the Democratic party took over 40 to become. This just isn't Bush or Delay or Armey or Hastert or Frist or Santorum's fault. Its people who either do not care to realize what is happening or aren't able to understand it. Win at all costs doesn't work long term in sports and it doesn't work in life nor politics. Its sad that people have to learn that at the expense of an enitre party's future.

     

    Additionally, don't bother complaining to me about this opinion. Call Sen. Warner and the others who don't agree with you and tell them they're not really Republicans.

  9. So, if you were to fight for the removal of the feeding tube for your wife and you finally get your wish, you stay away when the deed is done? You are really reaching in your defense of him now.

     

    As far as the investigation, if there is a possibility that he was the cause, shouldn't there be an investigation into what actually happened? There is a potential that a crime was committed. It needs to be investigated.

    281759[/snapback]

    To me it seems like this is just a family who is hurting and wants to blame someone. If there was any real evidence he would've been charged at some point.

  10. Only this instance. Other times, they are just as bad as Republicans in removing our Constitutional rights. Just look at the Second Amendment for a specific example of this.

    281747[/snapback]

    I think that one party interprets that ammendment to bear arms and the other party believes takes that right to the extreme.

     

    I'm a lifelong member of the NRA and hunt all the time. I don't believe that people should own .50 calibre sniper rifles or heavy machine guns espeically since it's been written in Al Qaeda training manuals that because of our lax laws they should abuse our system by buying guns to use against us at a later date. As Bush said "9-11 changed everytihng" and you're either "with the terrorists or against them".

  11. What I MEANT, since you apparently need explanation, is that the Dims have used other issues as exploitative propellant.

     

    See: Rodney King riots. See: proposed SS reform. Ad nauseam.

    281748[/snapback]

    We're dealing with a specific issue. Provide me a copy of the memo that Dems circulated about this specific issue.

  12. Reread this thread, I already posted one.  In addition there are several others that state that this is illegal.

    281749[/snapback]

    Then why didn't the federal appelas court vacate or overrule thier rulling? Then why didn't the Supreme Court hear the case?

  13. He has stated over and over that he wants the body immediately cremated when she passes. There is an allegation of abuse, and it is only prudent to investigate the matter fully. There was never an investigation into the alleged abuse the night she collapsed. Don't you think there should be an investigation?

     

    Hell, the guy wasn't even there when they removed the tube. He was too "busy" with other things. You would think that he would want to be there when they removed it. Hospitals go out of their way to schedule these things so that the family can be present. I guess it was too much of a bother.

     

    As far as Terri's "wish" to die, her husband seems to be changing his tune of late. In an interview on CNN (Larry King Show on Friday), he stated the following, "But this is not about [the parents], it's about Terri. And I've also said that in court. We didn't know what Terri wanted, but this is what we want..."

    281722[/snapback]

    I'm not going to speculate on anything related to an investigation because I don't have all the facts.

     

    As far as not wanting to be around what is now a media circus orchestrated by religious zealots who are manipulating her family as politcla pawns, I would avoid that at all costs.

  14. Right. And the Democrats don't try to play the same game?

     

    Remember Bismarck's maxim: The people should definitely not know about how sausage or politics are made.

    281733[/snapback]

    No. Democrats repect the constitution and state's rights in this instance. If you can produce a Democratic memo talking about how to take politicla advantage of this I'd like to see it.

     

    You can't.

  15. You find it vile and disgusting that someone would want to protect an innocent life?

     

    I'd be willing to bet that if there was someone on death row that you thought was "innocent" that you'd be howling for congress to intervene.

    281725[/snapback]

    She is dead and has been for years. The courts have decided in Terry's favor and Bush is shredding the constitution, trampling on state's right, and disregarding the rule of law for a cheap political point with religious extremists.

  16. Agreed. 

     

    Another issue that is particularly disturbing to me is that Congress is now in the business of intervening on familial issues.  IMO, it should be argued and settled in the courts.  Congress' involvement is an abuse of their powers and unconstitutional. 

     

    My political affilliation (or truth be told, lack thereof) notwithstanding, I find this entire thing vile and disgusting.

    281720[/snapback]

    How about the Republican memo that was distributed to Republican senators by party leaders that called the case a "great political issue" and a "tough issue for Democrats," per the WaPost.

     

    It said the case would excite the party's anti-abortion base and put pressure on Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat who faces re-election next year."

     

    This is just more political grandstanding on the Republicans' part and it sickens me. We used to be much better than this.

  17. The money was for her care, not for him to pay lawyers.  Secondly, while they say the awrd was 1 million it was really 2.5.  There is still a lot of money left and he wants it for himself, and his new squeeze, until he is tired of her. Then who knows, maybe she'll be in the same situation. :doh:

    281708[/snapback]

    Link?

×
×
  • Create New...