Jump to content

Hardy Pyle

Community Member
  • Posts

    574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hardy Pyle

  1. Right... luck?

     

    How many goals did Italy allow the entire tournament? How many did they score? Are you implying beating the home favorite in extra time by 2 goals is luck? Are you going to mention Australia, of course you would but you would obviously forget that there was a red card given that was undeserved.

     

    Any given day Argentina could score as they wish but once they face a strong defense, they will be shut down. Just ask Barcelona against Inter. Not only that, Nigeria and Korea could have easily scored more goals against Argentina. Their back line looked weak and now they lost Samuel.

     

    Get a clue dipshit.

     

     

     

    I trust what I see. Italy got seriously lucky in the 2006 tournament. They played powerhouses such as Australia and the Ukraine in the elimination rounds. Had a very nice game against Germany. And needed penalties to beat a 10 man France.

    They avoided most of the big clubs. I think you ask most astute soccer observers that Argentina was the best team at that tournament. But that doesn't necessarily mean you will win it. Once Pirlo was injured, I figured they would be done. He's the only class player on that team that has creativity abilities. Brazil winning in 2002 was great. A great team, won the right way and played wonderful football. Italy's 1982 win was nice. That was a nice side with Rossi.

     

    I thank the football gods that teams such as the Dutch, Brazil (except this year), Argentina to mention a few teams are around to play the beautiful game.

     

    As for Inter beating Barcelona, Inter were completely dominated in the return leg. Inter played the games of their lives and caught Barcelona in the first leg. There was also a Dani Alves penalty that was not allowed that was pretty clear. Off the top of my head, there were 4 Argentinian's on the Inter team. Two did not make the national team, and one is on the bench. Inter were pretty fortunate in the final that Ribery wasn't playing and that an Argentinian's quality came to the team's rescue and got them the victory.

     

     

    By reading many of your comments, it's fairly apparent you have never played soccer at any level and watch Serie A and the World Cup and make yourself a resident expert to NFL fans.

     

    I just skimmed this thread once in a while - but to answer someone's questions - yes, there are many tactical changes during the course of the game that occur. For the novice fan, what I would recommend looking at how players use space and attack space. Far too often a player is able to attack space and is in a dangerous attacking position but then will lay it off to the wing. Any defender will tell you - thanks. The players that are truly danger - Villa's, Messi', Ronaldo's are the players that attack the space, attack defenders. They force the issue. This scares defenders. This is why they are so successful. The use and creation of space is a beautiful thing when done right.

  2. "He seems like a smart guy"

     

    I don't like the way TO behaves, but must question whether there is method to his madness.

     

    The publicity he gets you can't just buy. And his NFL career is over in 1-2 years. If it's about the $$$$, if I was him, I would be making sure my name stays in the media any way possible. If it's about self respect and how I would like to conduct myself, I would STFU.

     

    He has position himself well for a TV life after football.

  3. I think it comes down to rushing the passer.

     

    Look at the Superbowl-winning defenses of the past 10 years, very few of them have 2 big DTs:

     

    2009 - Pittsburgh: 1 big NT (Hampton) and two 290 pounders (Kirschke/Smith)

    2008 - NY Giants: Nobody over 300 lbs on the whole d-line

    2007 - Indianapolis: Tampa-2, best DT was 295-lb A. McFarland

    2006 - Pittsburgh: see above

    2005 - New England: Wilfork goes 325, but Seymour/Warren hover around 290

    2004 - New England: see above

    2003 - Tampa Bay: A. McFarland (295) and Warren Sapp (300+), I guess this is a good example of what you said

    2002 - New England: Now we're in the pre-Warren/Wilfork days, but they still had Seymour

    2001 - Baltimore: Another good example for your argument with Adams/Siragusa

     

    Not too many teams with those big lugs at DT, but every one of them had good pass rushers:

     

    2009 - Pittsburgh: Harrison/Woodley

    2008 - NY Giants: Strahan, Umenyiora, Tuck

    2007 - Indianapolis: Freeney/Mathis

    2006 - Pittsburgh: Porter/Gildon

    2005 - New England: Vrabel/Colvin

    2004 - New England: see above

    2003 - Tampa Bay: S. Rice/G. Spires

    2002 - New England: Vrabel/Phifer

    2001 - Baltimore: McCrary/Burnett

     

    Just my 1 cent.

     

    Good food for thought, but I think if you can't play the rush well on 1st and 2nd down great pass rushers become less effective on 3rd and short. All those teams, with the exception of Indy (maybe?), were awfully tough to run on.

     

    I also think that you can scheme or find ways to generate a pass rush. But a big ugly to plug the middle, tough to do without the right personnel.

  4. "It looks like Langston Walker is going to start at left tackle. They think he's a better pass blocker than Jason Peters. I don't. But we'll see how Walker holds up at the most important position on the O line. "

     

    Really...the Bills think that Walker is better than Peters at pass blocking. Interesting, considering the success Walker had in the first 4 games, I've always wondered about how much of a drop off there was between Walker and Peter, but never would have publicly stated that Walker was a better pass blocker.

×
×
  • Create New...