Jump to content

Bill Grundy

Community Member
  • Posts

    702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bill Grundy

  1. 10 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

    Calling him now a sportsman is kind of b*******

     

    He's 6'7 300 lb... And runs a 4.7 forty 

     

    He's an insane athlete..  I don't care if he played bar League rugby or tennis at a country club 

     

    His size and speed is world class... And you could take a few years to mold him into whatever you want 

     

    Patrick Ricard is a 300 lb fullback.. you can see if he can figure out full back over 2 years behind Gilliam.. get him to lose 20 lb and see if he can catch a ball at TE

     

    You can take 3 years and see if you can develop him as a swing tackle.. give him the ball on the 1 yard line 

     

    Obviously it's a pick that probably will not pan out..  but at the end of the draft you can never go wrong taking an athletic specimen 

     

    He is far from your average athlete with his size and running ability

     

     

     

    I accept what you are saying. But an athlete and a sportsman aren't quite the same thing. I don't doubt his physical and athletic attributes. But talent is another thing. If you can take a guy whose previous sporting job is simply to run fast past men half his size at the lowest sporting level - and turn him into an NFL tackle ... then that coaching team are geniuses. I mean, I hope to be proven wrong. But I'd be worried if this lad was selected for my local rugby team. Let alone my favourite NFL franchise. 

     

    But, yes, I agree he's an athlete. I'm not just sure that's the same thing as a sportsman - in my definition of the term. Looks like he's turned his hand at a few and not made the grade. Mad if he eventually makes it probably the most elite sport in the world. 

  2. In terms of rugby positions …

     

    there are very few similarities in the two games skill wise

     

    In terms of OT, absolutely zero. At best a front row. But it’s just not comparable.

     

    Matt Milano has skills that might make him a good player at centre or flanker in rugby. But it doesn’t really work both ways. And hardly at all on offense.

     

    For the record, the guy Rees Zammit who KC got. He plays the same position as this lad. It could potentially be transferred to half back or wide receiver. But probably not.

     

    But zammit was an excellent international pro. One of the best in the game. This boy played for a pub team. It’s too much to call him a rugby player. I work with a boy who plays at a higher level than this lad on the weekends 


    He’s just big. But he’s not a sportsman.

     

    if he IS … then this is the greatest spot in history.

     

    ignore this quote bit below. Messed up my post on my phone and can’t change it 

    Just now, Bill Grundy said:

    In terms of rugby positions …

     

    there are very few similarities in the two games skill wise

     

    In terms of OT, absolutely zero. At best a front row. But it’s just not comparable.

     

    Matt Milano has skills that might make him a good player as a flanker or centre in rugby. But it doesn’t really work both ways. And hardly at all on offense.

     

    For the record, the guy Rees Zammit who KC got. He plays the same position as this lad. It could potentially be transferred to half back or wide receiver. But probably not.

     

    But zammit was an excellent international pro. One of the best in the game. This boy played for a pub team. It’s too much to call him a rugby player. I work with a boy who plays at a higher level than this lad on the weekends 


    He’s just big. But he’s not a sportsman.

     

    if he IS … then this is the greatest spot in history.

     

  3. 7 minutes ago, boyst said:

    the guy couldn't even go pro in england playing rugby so i don't think he has a chance of cracking the 53 for the NFL.

     

    but, i'd love to make him a short yardage runner.

     

    Not even pro. He couldn't make it at as an amatuer

     

    He's describe here as a gentle giant. Which means he's a softie. A fact further corroborated by him playing on the wing - historically (with a few exceptions) where you put the most delicate player. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/articles/cne9jmlremeo

     

    He's a bust. I don't even know how he even got onto the draft? Did he win a competition or something? 

     

     

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  4. He's being called a 'rugby player'.

     

    But he plays in the eigth tier of English rugby. I. can't even tell you how far down that is. It's barely pub level. My old club plays 8th tier. 

     

    He's also a winger in rugby. Which means his attribute is pace and he's too much of a pansy to get involved with the rough stuff. 

     

    It's weirdest pick I've ever seen. 7th round or otherwise. I presume there are political reasons behind it. 

     

    If he's a Tackle, I'm Napoleon. But it's a laugh, I suppose.

    • Like (+1) 2
  5. I really enjoyed reading the OP.

     

    I differ a little in that I think the future health of franchise comes first. Our superbowl-ready team failed to reach the superbowl three times. Now we are in transition again. That's annoying but it's the fact.  Josh is going to have to work with what he's got (though he'll get one more WR i'm sure). I get why we'd want to back him more this year - we are so desperate for that SB - but I can see why were not doing it too. ***** or bust strategies aren't everyone's idea of fun.

     

    Prime Josh Allen has a harder job to do this year, hopefully he's even more prime than we ever knew.

  6. The more I think about this the happier I am. If we can make regular 20 yard plays in the air and in the red zone, and regular 8 yard plays on the ground, and defend the way we usually do, we are going to be a handful for any team. We will wear sides down instead of depending on the superman stuff. Plus, Josh has his cannon if he needs it It's been great fun watching our harum scarum stuff the last few years. But strong, safe hands could really be a game changer for Buffalo. Probably suits playoff weather too. 

  7. 4 hours ago, papazoid said:

    Josh is absolutely the best single individual player in the league. but this is a TEAM game.....

     

    Unfortunately he is not surrounded by the best team or best coaching staff.

     

    he has improved every year talent wise, i expect the same this season.

     

    look at the difference with Joe Brady as OC in 2nd half of season....remarkable. now we have that for a full season

     

    they can truly spread the ball around without worrying about forcing things to diggs. look for all his other  targets to step up.

     

    the biggest difference this season will be LEADERSHIP. 6 of 8 captains from last year are gone. only josh and von remain.

     

    this is josh's team now.....he's ready......look out  NFL !

     

     

    I reall think Brady is just right for Josh. Being superman is something to keep in reserve. It can’t be depended on. 15 yard TDs are fine. Preferable even. Although I will miss the ride a bit. The entertainment was off the scale before

     

  8. Diggs didn't seem fully integral to Brady's game plan last season. Doesn't feel like he needs a superstar WR - just a few good ones. Get the interceptions out of Josh's games and play a more conservative and consistent offence. 

     

    It's a great deal for the Texans - Diggs is pure showtime - but I'm okay with moving on. He's a pretty high maintenance dude.

    • Agree 1
  9. 1 hour ago, TFBillsfan said:

    Add to that draft Hutchinson, DE and Jameson Williams at WR in 2022 and they’ve crushed their last two drafts! That’s SIX long term impactful starters on rookie contracts.

    It’s true, but I think my granny would have managed to pick Hutchinson at number 2 overall.

×
×
  • Create New...