I ask because I've been watching her now for a good 3 years, and NOTHING she predicts, says, or even comments on is accurate. 1st off, anyone who plays fantasy stay the hell away from any "analytics" advise Frelund gives you, and that's both season fantasy and especially daily fantasy football. She's total garbage, and her mocks exercises are not even worth the frequency bandwidth of hot air. Just recently she gives a mock for this years first round of not where she thinks players will go, but which players will have an immediate impact, taking into account what she believes those teams records will be for 2019. Um.. what? Why even bother, it's pointless, and zero football knowledge can be gleaned from any of that nonsense, and to watch the guys criticize her without actually criticizing her is laughable, makes me want to puke. Brooks just literally said that he agreed with Frelund that Haskins could be picked by the Pats at 32 and that (get this) Haskins is Tom Brady 2.0.... Yes he literally just said that!
My point, if not made abundantly clear, is, why is this women on TV talking about football like she's some sage of wisdom every week? Has anyone ever heard her say anything intelligent when it comes to football fantasy or predictive analytics? Anything?
Tim-
Thank you, I couldn't believe that I could be the only one that noticed her 'analytics' are far from even believable. The algorithms that produce these results are either written by a 5-year-old or perhaps herself, considering her mentality level is roughly equal to that judging by her ineptitude at speaking. I have yet to see any of her analyses be accurate (except maybe the Patriots) in which practically every legitimate NFL fan could give the Pats a predicted record between 11-5 and 12-4 the past 10+ years and be correct most of the time. I am so tired of people getting jobs in positions solely based on their looks. Can't remember the network, but they hired an ex-porn actress as a fantasy football analyst...I mean come on, seriously...regarding Cynthia - Yes she's pretty, yeah she has a good body, but so what? She's quite possibly one of the dumbest human beings in a position of reporting the News or Entertainment I have ever, unfortunately, listened to. NFLN need to drop her and find more women like Kay Adams if they need to up their gender diversity.
Flame away interwebs, I could care less about your opinions.
Why do people at NFLN take Cynthia Frelund seriously?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Thank you, I couldn't believe that I could be the only one that noticed her 'analytics' are far from even believable. The algorithms that produce these results are either written by a 5-year-old or perhaps herself, considering her mentality level is roughly equal to that judging by her ineptitude at speaking. I have yet to see any of her analyses be accurate (except maybe the Patriots) in which practically every legitimate NFL fan could give the Pats a predicted record between 11-5 and 12-4 the past 10+ years and be correct most of the time. I am so tired of people getting jobs in positions solely based on their looks. Can't remember the network, but they hired an ex-porn actress as a fantasy football analyst...I mean come on, seriously...regarding Cynthia - Yes she's pretty, yeah she has a good body, but so what? She's quite possibly one of the dumbest human beings in a position of reporting the News or Entertainment I have ever, unfortunately, listened to. NFLN need to drop her and find more women like Kay Adams if they need to up their gender diversity.
Flame away interwebs, I could care less about your opinions.