bufrock j
-
Posts
51 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by bufrock j
-
-
2 hours ago, mileena said:
I have been meaning to ask this for a long time: who is the guy with the Sabres sweatshirt on the right of the pic talking to McD? I know it's some famous player from the 90's.
Is it Thurman Thomas, Cornelius Bennett, or Bruce Smith? I can't tell from any of their pics since they have all gotten fatter, and this guy is wearing a hat. Also a bad angle.
u suck bye
-
1
-
-
all those guys come out same year?
-
58 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:
I thought Edmunds would look awesome in 59, I was wondering who took it. But 49 is cool too.
Really fast, super athletic linebacker who has some upside. Jets fans thought he had a lot of abilty an dthought he got a raw deal becuase of politics. I think that means he is better than Darron Lee, but they played Lee instead. Instantly a special teams star and will push Milano at Will and can play Mie as well. I think we gave him a bit too much money, but he is a player with some upside.
I believe these were his pro day numbers:
Measurable Measurement %tile Height 6' 1¼"* 42 Weight 228 lbs* 11 10 Yard Split 1.44s* 99 40 Yard Dash 4.51s* 92 Vertical Jump 42½"* 98 Broad Jump 128"* 93 3-Cone Drill 6.59s* 99 20 Yard Shuttle 4.02s* 96 Bench Press 27 reps* 86 great job thanks
-
1
-
-
51 is a great number who the heck is stanford ?
-
U ARE AN IDIOT
-
1 hour ago, colin said:
dude, remember the jets/NO, NE stretch?
Tyrod just turtled up and did nothing. was so hard to watch.
or cincy, we get the late turnover, and he just freaking sat there and didn't throw, or threw a nice 5 yard out on 3rd and long.
i remember thinking that TT was the worst QB in the league during that stretch and then second worst QB all the rest of the time its a shame he gets credit for getting us to playoffs cause he sure does not deserve it, just TERRIBLE have fun brownies
-
47 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:
Anyone else hate linebacker numbers in the 40s?
nope although my favorite is 51
-
2 hours ago, RyanC883 said:
Meanwhile, Mike Mayock has us taking 2 of his top 11 players (Allen and Edmunds). If you leave a draft with two top 11 players, with picks 12 and 22 to start, you win.
Also, Edmunds is a top 4 talent on many people's board. Getting him at 16 was a steal, as was Phillips in the 3rd. It's like we didn't need those 2nd rounders that we "overpaid" for.
I've been a HUGE critic of drafting Allen. By every metric he will be a top tier backup at best. Hopefully those metrics are wrong, or AJ goes nuts this year, keeps Allen on the bench and we trade Allen in a year or 2 for a 1st and 2nd.
Overall, I'd give us an A. Esp. when you consider the UDFA haul we pulled in.
whats so great about UDFA's honest question
-
reuter gives almost every team an A. complete crap . i know he works for the NFL but come on . by the way we only got a B+. i think BUF had a great draft
-
ballage is my pick
-
are those stats between allen and wentz correct in the vid ? WOW other than comp percent his numbers are way better bills are killing this draft BEANO
-
i honestly don't care that much as long as its one of the top five QB'S and yes i include jackson in the top five GET IT DONE BEANER
-
1
-
-
no duh this is stupid
-
he was the only reason i didn't shoot my tv's
-
2
-
-
i hope so. i used to like him, even playing for N E but that play on tre was one of the worst things i have ever seen in forty years of watching football .
-
1
-
-
i would give up pick 96 for him pick up a WR later in draft then at end of year [if he behaves himself] pick between him and kelvin for a long term contract
-
silly goose
-
1 minute ago, Derby Dan said:
Really Jackson is like Taylor athletic and no accuracy. You can not teach size and arm strength
jackson is nothing like taylor [ please do some research before saying that ] except black and fast .
-
1
-
-
you got half of it right [the josh part]. josh allen is gonna suck .and anybody that reads should know. way, way to many red flags.he was bad against bad teams in a bad conference. we are not getting below the fifth pick and i hope he is not there would rather have jackson, rosen or mayfield
-
21 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
He'd have to sit behind AJM for a season.
so?
-
26 minutes ago, H2o said:
Sam Darnold high end Tony Romo, low end Ryan Tannehill.
Josh Allen high end Ben Roethlisberger, low end Kyle Boller.
Josh Rosen high end Tom Brady-esque, low end Trent Edwards.
Baker Mayfield high end Drew Brees, low end Doug Flutie.
Lamar Jackson high end Michael Vick, low end Terrell Pryor.
Mason Rudolph high end Andy Dalton, low end Derek Anderson.
WORD right freaking on dude
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, jrober38 said:
I completely disagree.
3 first round picks and 1 second is the farm. That's the affordable core of your team 3-5 years from now.
yeah that is a little to much as next year is gonna be a top ten pick shoot for 6 or seven and its just two ones this year or stay at twelve and take jackson then load the team up the team is depleted QB LB OL WR GO BILLS
-
tasker is awesome looking forward to this even though i don't really like murphy
-
39 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:
I disagree. Still need a DT and DE on the DLine. Get the trenches squared away before before you go after skill positions.
full squad on DL including backups not saying no need but more than WR ? have you looked at depth chart on receivers yikes then take a look at LB's depth order is QB LB OL WR its looking like we need all our picks gimme JACKSON
-
1
-
Who was better when they arrived in Buffalo
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
that is a good question,,,, tells you how bad e j was and whats his fuk from n e cassel tt could run once in a while but man was he a crappy qb, just bad at least Mc Carron has some competition