jumpgo692003
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by jumpgo692003
-
-
17 minutes ago, Tyrod's friend said:
I'll start with NFL tracker. Their scoring has correctly led to the first QB taken pretty frequently, and I think their first two have always gone 1-2.
They score Darnold 7.1, but all of the remaining QBs between 6 an 6.1. (By the way, the drop between Darnold and the next guy is the largest in the last five years. And the drop between all other players available, and the second best QB is ridiculous.)
Ok, ok, I can hear it now. Nobody likes NFL Tracker, and Chris Trappasso is an idiot. How about Mayock? He's fairly indecisive about choices - tends to like a lot of them. Rudolph is clearly not in the mix but the others are close. I've listened to every Waldman review of all the QBs - he's not really decisive, although he likes Rosen a lot. It's clear he can't stand Allen, but then again he gives a LOT, I mean ALOT of love to Jackson whom almost no one else considers in the mix.
That's what I've read, seen and heard. I know there are plenty of people that do a lot more research here than me. But I don't think I'm far off in saying there's no clear cut, blemish-less QB.
if you believe that then you should be vocal about standing pat or trading down because Jackson will likely be available.
-
4 minutes ago, matter2003 said:
Why do we need to aim higher? What if they feel like there are 3 QBs, any of which they'd be OK with?
I'll put money that 2 QBs that everyone says are "Top 10 locks" will in fact be selcted outside the Top 10...happens every year...draft pundits ideas usually dont align with NFL teams ideas.
I would bet the top 3 are gone by pick 5. allen being the wildcard
-
Just now, Manther said:
That is a lot to give up. If the FO thinks there is a guy to take.........then you do it. If not, you don't.
exactly. he better be the franchise qb though. that is a large chunk of future assets to give up imo
-
1 minute ago, Manther said:
I think if the New York Football Giants are taking a RB they should trade out. I just don't see the value in a RB at #2. No matter how good the RB is.
deep rb class and Eli showing serious regression....my money is on qb for them.
-
9 minutes ago, Tyrod's friend said:
'xactly.
Consider: out of the top six QBs (including Rudolph here), probably only 3 are NFL quality starters. More than likely, if we draft a QB in the first round he will get more starts than all the other 1st round QBs combined. No matter who you draft, the other guys are sitting behind Proven Veterans.
Yet staying in place, adding possibly two more Pro Bowl type starters to Tre and Dion, and being one year removed from the playoffs for the first time ... that's going to result in firing Beane and McDermott. Not to mention, yes, possibly getting that franchise guy at 12. Nobody knows, because the differences between all the QB prospects are widely, widely agreed to as being slight. There is no clear cut Andrew Luck out there.
Sky's falling. Better get out of the way.widely? odd considering most i have read and heard say after the top 4, there is a gap....a large one. some believe after top 3 (excluding allen) the general consensus has
Rosen and Darnold...... some add Mayfield......a few add allen. don't think Jackson or Rudolph is thought of anywhere near them.
-
6 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:
Knowing it's the Jets making this pick at #3 leads me to believe they will shoot themselves in the foot like always. There is no Andrew Luck in this year's draft and hopefully, the Jets pick Mark Sanchez number two, or Sam Bradford number two.
Even if they pick Allen or Mayfield they will screw the kid by starting him right away and thus get him killed on a bad team. Their coaching staff stinks, their roster stinks and I doubt they win more than five games in 2018.
New Jets GM, coaching staff in 2019.
that sounds more like sour grapes than statistical projection. who cares if they hit on their qb. the goal is for the bills to hit on theirs. the jets trade (smart imo) secures a top 3 qb at worst. bills need to Decide if the franchise qb is in this draft. if so, pay whatever it cost and if not, don't overpay and just draft bpa at the picks they have. that simple.
-
lol. doubt they can afford the #1. both 1sts, 2nd, both 3rds and a 1st next year. I don't see the bills doing that. silly season
-
3 minutes ago, thunderingsquid said:
-
The Browns were never trading the number one pick it would take your first three rounds this year and likely your first round next year to even think about it and I don't see the bills doing that so I comes down to the number 2 pick and the number 4 pick. The two pick all depends on whether the Giants are trying to find Eli successor or not in this draft and the number four pick all comes down to who is left or how much the Bills are willing to pay to force the Browns all the way down to 12 which pretty much eliminates them from Top tier Talent. I think the Bills are better off staying where they're at and hoping somebody falls because the price they are going to have to pay to move up is going to be astronomical and I felt that way even before the Jets trade
The Jets Just Made a Mistake
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Well this is certainly a revolutionary type of trading before the draft it is not a mistake in my opinion it is a calculated risk and much less of one than waiting on draft day