-
Posts
1,712 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by PauleeeWalnuts
-
-
They did not do enough at WR. You have JA17 as your friggin QB, he needs as many targets and downfield threats as possible. Instead you traded away his #1 and his #2 left in FA and really didn’t replace either. Samuel you can argue may replace Davis, but there is definitely no #1 in that building.
Knox is invisible, Kincaid has cement hands, Cook drops too many easy balls, and you have no idea what you’re getting from the rookie Coleman. You can’t compete for a championship when the Bills always address the WR position as they do. You can, however, compete for an early playoff exit which they consistently do.
- 2
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
As per Ian Rappaport
1 year, up to $8.25 million
https://www.instagram.com/p/C6guRLsuEfg/?igsh=emJmbXN5MTc4Zmwy
- 1
- 1
- 7
-
1 hour ago, KentuckyBillsFan said:
This front office will never build around Allen… and I think the biggest reason for that is Sean McDermott.
Carolina never built around Cam either…they expect these guys to be Superman
-
Definitely no
-
37 minutes ago, Ayjent said:
You lose wr1 and wr2, and starting C - and you go slow WR, S, back up DT. Nice!!!
it’s kinda criminal that they are content just letting Josh carry the offense without trying to make it exceptional. So we’ll be the 20s version of the 80s Browns, 80-90s Dolphins and 90s Chiefs at best - good enough to compete but never good enough to be even the best in the conference. The overemphasis on D in an offensive league when you have a gem at QB is baffling.
They did the same with Cam…had to be Superman.
-
FFS can we just draft a WR already?
- 1
- 2
-
16 minutes ago, ToGoGo said:
Wrap your mind around this:
Fans are losing their mind on trading down from 28 to 33.
Let that sink in. Then start ignoring these people.
They lost two WR, didn’t gain any picks and traded with the team that owns them in the process. We should prob just ignore the people that are ok with this.
- 1
-
23 minutes ago, MJS said:
This type of emotional response shows why being a fan clouds your judgement. Luckily, Beane is not a fan of the Bills. He is a professional who can look past petty rivalries and focus on what is good for the Bills and what is not.
Helping KC get better is not good for the Bills.
- 1
- 2
-
44 minutes ago, Gunvald's Husse said:
Neither plain nor simple.
It is clear that Beane did not consider Worthy to be to value pick at 28 so, unless you wanted the Bills to select Worthy just to stop the Chiefs getting him (a real "cut off your nose to spite your face" move), they were going to get him anyway, either by picking him at 32 for free or by trading up with the Cowboys or the Ravens to get ahead of the 49ers (a trade which would have gained nothing for the Bills and which would have cost less for the Chiefs)
So, did you want them to draft Worthy just to deny him to the Chiefs?
No, the Bills could make whatever pick they wanted at 28, you just don’t help KC get who they want through you.
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Gugny said:
I don’t think worrying about other teams is a good strategy.
Clearly, there was no one at 28 who the Bills wanted.
The fact that KC ended up getting a WR without pick doesn’t faze me.
I don’t care what KC does.
I find it hard fo believe that Beane is content going into next season with our current WRs plus any receiver(s) he gets in subsequent rounds.
He has a plan.
You don’t help the team that’s been eating your lunch for three years, plain and simple.
- 1
- 1
-
Definitely not, the trade with KC alone makes him a moron. They’re trying to do to Josh what they did to Cam, be Superman and get it done all by himself. This guy prefers to stack 5th rounders over picking 1st rounders.
- 6
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Nitro said:
Colts GM said that they had only 20 guys with first round grades. Deep draft and the Bills get more picks. Works for me.
Did they really need another 5th to move back one spot and take the same player anyway?
-
How many 5ths does Beane need? This franchise is debilitating.
- 1
-
-
1 minute ago, BeastMaster said:
The next Tyreek Hill he is not
Anyone who thinks this doesn't realize the difference between the two
Yeah we will see. The last tlme they traded with the Bills worked out real well for Buffalo.
-
2 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:
Guys.. Get over that the pick was the chiefs.... we got a THIRD ROUND PICK! its a WIN..
and there are still GOOD Wr's on the field.
You don’t help the team that’s been picking your pocket for three years!!
- 1
- 1
-
1 minute ago, No_Matter_What said:
If we take Legette at 32 and then safety in 3rd round who wouldn't be available in the 4th I can live with that...
You don’t trade with the Chiefs, period. Bad enough they gave them the next Tyreek Hill
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
Of all teams to help out, you trade with the effin franchise that has owned you for years. What a J/O move by Beane, clowned every single fan doing that.
-
5 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:
DeVonta Smith got his bag today, and $25m/per is no small number. I would think Aiyuk will command more than this, and I know a lot of people have been thinking Bills could trade for him, make some crazy offer for Jefferson, or even Higgins (no thanks).
I have a hard time seeing Beane see this kind of money going out for a WR2 and thinking its a good idea to trade for a WR1 likely to cost more than this. I won't rule it out, Beane has shown to be aggressive when he wants a player, but I would think this pushes Aiyuk contract demands up even more and I am gonna guess Jefferson might end up the first WR over $30M (Hill being the first to hit $30M).
We are staring at a historically great WR draft, so is Beane going to focus there (maybe he already was) or would he still pull the trigger knowing he is gonna have to pay one north of $25M per? My gut says draft, we are in a different cap situation then when we traded for Diggs and Allen was on his rookie deal still, so hard to see him want to take on that much cap with a WR draft this strong in front of him. But never know...
Bills are in a soft rebuild, they’re not adding top talent. Trading Diggs makes it evident they’re going to try and do more with less. No way they’re eating his $31 million in dead cap money only to add big dollars on top of it.
- 1
-
✌🏻✌🏻✌🏻
-
2 minutes ago, Seventeen said:
Trading Diggs just solidifies Beane taking WR in the 1st round and possibly moving up to do so - unless he's playing 4-D chess with a trade coming to replace Diggs.
I don’t think there is any money to trade for anyone else
-
1 minute ago, appoo said:
The bills were never gonna use 11 draft picks, and losing a 6th is losing a player who’s odds of making the game day roster was incredibly low
Yeah I guess that’s true
-
2 minutes ago, BuffaloMatt said:
Let's put it in perspective. Diggs became a really expensive decoy last year. First ten games Dorsey forced him the ball and even when he eclisped 100 yards we lost half those games. We lose his salary, gain some capital and I believe Beane has a plan.
I’m not sure about capital. They got a 2025 second, gave up a 6th this year and a 5th next year to move him. Feels like Beane got beat up on this one
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:
Wow, we got no picks this year. 2025 2nd rounder via Vikings.
We sent them Diggs, 6th this year and 5th next year.
Plus the cap hit…I’d say we lost this one
- 1
- 5
Is it true the Bills didn’t “do enough” at WR to compete for championships?
in The Stadium Wall
Posted · Edited by PauleeeWalnuts
Had some big drops, hope you’re no longer lost