Jump to content

GRONK SPIKE!

Community Member
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GRONK SPIKE!

  1. I don't know what Pats fan you know but every Pats fan I know knows who Bledsoe was and what he did for this frachise, growing up in the 90's he was my favorite player as a kid.

     

    Same happened to the Bills @ Pats* during first quarter. They were pulling out flags left and right, trying to set the tone. The Cheatriot tone. I was reading some great conspiracy stuff on the Ravens fan board. How the refs wait for the play with the greatest momentum swing. Reminded me of how they took a Fred Jackson screen for a first in the first drive of game, called a phantom holding call, nowhere near the play. turned a first into a 3rd and very long. Huge momentum swings. When the pats get called for holding, it's always after they get stuffed. I've NEVER seen one nullify a big play for them.

     

    That was just a poorly officiated game, Pats got hosed on as many calls as the bills did if not more.

  2. The article only says something in a third-floor window of a house next to the field during Cheatriots' practice, it doesn't prove cheatriots did not film Rams' practice in any way.

     

    Cheatriots might or might not film Rams' practice, but showing something during Cheatriots' practice doesn't prove anything during Rams' practice.

     

    It looks like you are trying to imply typical Cheatriots fans' response (1):

     

    (1) Others may cheat so cheating by cheatriots is okay and a honorable thing to do.

    (2) Cheatriots' record after spygate means they didn't cheat. (Hello, being a good team and cheating aren't mutually exclusive. A top 5 student could cheat to become #1. Being a top 5 student doesn't mean he doesn't cheat.)

     

    There is evidence that the Patriots were spied on, no evidence that the Rams were. If there were Patriots employees spying on the Rams do you think the same league sources would have stated that? Your arguments have no evidence backing them and are the same ones that have been debunked over the last five years. All you do is stick your fingers in your ears and yell cheatriots cheatriots to avoid facing evidence.

  3. yeah, but even still I don't hear much about him being capable of stepping in the team doing well. Also, wasn't Hoyer cut for some other reason?

    yeah, but even still I don't hear much about him being capable of stepping in the team doing well. Also, wasn't Hoyer cut for some other reason?

    Nope, Hoyer was cut becuase Mallet beat him out. It was clear both in camp and during exibition games. There isn't any talk of him stepping in becuase there is no reason to, Brady is performing at MVP levels.

  4. Not every coach, but there is no doubt in my mind that Dallas cheated.

    Dallas did do what we did, we didn't film practices, we filmed during games. We filmed things that 60,000 people could see clearly in person.

    http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/blitz/index.php/2008/02/23/jimmy-johnson-thinks-spygate-is-overblown/

     

     

     

    Somebody was filming practices before the Super Bowl, but it wasn't the Pats.

    http://www.nytimes.c...le-is-fine.html

    Club and league officials said a telescope was clearly visible in the window, according to a pool report, and that 15 minutes later, a person appeared at the window, and then vanished.

    Article was written in 2002 and quotes league officials.

  5. If you wan't to look at a team that might be cheating at home, look at the Seahawks.

    5-0 at home, 1-5 on the road this year

    From 2003 to 2007 the Patriots have an 86% home winning record, the colts have 81%

    On the road, Colts win 73% and the Patriots 72%. The two best at home are the two best on the road, when you see a team like Seattle have such a large discrepency you can get suspicious, even if you adjust for the opponent, Seattle lost to MIA, DET, ARZ, STL and SF with the only win against CAR on the road. At home they beat GB, NE, NYJ, MIN, DAL.

  6. A few thoughts on that comedy play:

     

    1) Apparently Sanchez is an ass man.

     

    2) Even if Brandon Moore doesn't get fined for a hit to the head, he'll still likely have a very sore angus.

     

    3) Sanchez will be really embarrassed until he remembers that he's going home to Eva Longoria.

     

    Not so fast on #3, he got dumped

  7. So NFL "suspends" Ed Reed for disregarding the helmet rule, yet nothing at all on Brandon Spikes? That hit on Sanchez at the goal line was clear leading with the helmet. This guy can only hope that he can play as good as Reed, yet the NFL ignores this POS.

    No H-to-H rule on runs, same reason Landry wasn't flagged on Edelman

  8. Yeah, I'm sure there is only one Bryan O'Leary around.

     

    http://www.spygatebook.com/about-the-author/

    Bryan O’Leary is a first time author and die hard NFL fan. He has over 20 year’s experience in the money management

    arena, currently creating commodity trading strategies. Married with three daughters, O’Leary lives in the Dallas, Texas area.

     

    Washington, DC—NASD Regulation, Inc., today announced that an NASD Regulation Hearing Panel expelled Premier Capital Management, Inc., Dallas, TX, for placing materially misleading advertisements in national publications to tout Continental Investment Corporation

     

    Anyone?

    It's becuase it is a widespread practice. Gamesmanship they used to call it.

  9. I just looked the writer of this book up:

    http://www.finra.org/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2000/P011418

    The guy is a fraud con artist.

    Washington, DC—NASD Regulation, Inc., today announced that an NASD Regulation Hearing Panel expelled Premier Capital Management, Inc., Dallas, TX, for placing materially misleading advertisements in national publications to tout Continental Investment Corporation (OTCBB:CICGQ), failing to disclose compensation received from Continental, and other violations. The firm’s president and owner, Bryan James O’Leary, was suspended for 325 days and fined $62,500, while Ryan Mark Reynolds, a former registered representative, was suspended for 720 days and fined $155,000. In addition, O’Leary and Reynolds were ordered to buy back shares from, or to make restitution to, customers who purchased Continental stock based on one of Premier’s advertisements. O’Leary and Reynolds were also ordered to re-qualify and prove payment was made to customers prior to associating with a member firm. If they seek to re-enter the industry, they will be subject to pre-use filing requirements for future proposed advertisements and other communications with the public.

     

     

     

    The Hearing Panel found that O’Leary and Reynolds had placed a materially misleading eight-page insert advertisement touting Continental in the September 1997 issue of Mutual Funds Magazine. The advertisement, which purported to be a research report, was distributed to more than 625,000 individuals. In addition, single-page advertisements, which described Continental as "A Stock Whose Time Has Come," and invited readers to contact Premier for a copy of "our research report," appeared in issues of Town & Country, Individual Investor, Estates Internationale, and Leading Estates of the World. Continental is a Dallas, TX corporation, which owned a large parcel of land near Atlanta, GA, which it believed had a possible future as a waste management facility.

     

     

     

    The Hearing Panel found that the advertisement contained in Mutual Funds Magazine failed to provide an accurate and balanced picture of the risks and benefits of the investment, projected returns without a reasonable basis, and contained exaggerated claims. The following were among the fraudulent statements contained in the advertisement:

     

    "nless Bill Gates or the Japanese dig a Grand Canyonesque hole 9 miles from downtown Atlanta, the value of [Continental’s] property has no place to go but up."

    "Even if 99% of all stocks are dragged down with the overall market, in our opinion, [Continental] will be an extremely profitable exception."

    "[W]e expect to see a tremendous upside ‘run’ in [Continental’s] stock price all the way up to, at least, the mid-fifties."

    "Continental presents a ‘textbook case’ ... wherein a small company holding an insurmountable strategic advantage can potentially achieve complete predominance over significantly larger competitors."

     

    In addition, the Hearing Panel found that Premier, O’Leary, and Reynolds failed to disclose the compensation they received from Continental for touting its stock. Premier received more than $200,000 to cover the costs it incurred for printing and publishing the research report and the single-page advertisements. The Panel also found that Reynolds received 10,000 shares of Continental stock, then worth over $200,000, as compensation for Reynolds’s services on behalf of Continental. Premier and O’Leary also failed to file the report with the Association’s Advertising Regulation Department.

×
×
  • Create New...