Pecos Bills
-
Posts
82 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Pecos Bills
-
-
Psych 👈👀 endlessly quotable in everyday life
-
2
-
1
-
-
27 minutes ago, stevestojan said:
the whack job is back at it. Now, AIDS was created by the US government.
Is he just another wingnut on the “dO yOuR oWn rESeaRcH” kick, or is he mentally damaged?
https://www.newsweek.com/aaron-rodgers-hiv-comments-backlash-1891122
Or is he, above all else, an attention *****? 👀
-
3
-
-
Michael Marcagi only has a handful of songs on an EP but is one to watch in 2024:
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Gugny said:
Jets have been to two AFCCGs in the last 15 years.
Twice as many as the Bills.
Bills have been to 6 AFCCGs in the past 35 years.
Twice as many as the Jets.
Who cares?
-
-
These lyrics, this entire album (A Crow Looked At Me)
"Our daughter is one and a half
You have been dead eleven days
I got on the boat and came to the place
Where the three of us were going to build our house if you had lived
You died though
So I came here alone with our baby and the dust of your bones..."-
1
-
-
-
9 hours ago, GaryPinC said:
B1G fans would totally throw out a chant if they won the natl Champs as much as the SEC.
Um no, they (we) absolutely would not do any such thing. The S-E-C conference chant is sui generis.
-
1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:
Peacock costs me like $6 a month. If you’re not willing to pay that, I have no sympathy. You aren’t that committed. I pay over 100x that for every single home game and never complain. I CHOOSE to do that because I love the Bills. If you elect to not pay the $6 on principle, that’s your choice, but don’t come here looking for people to feel sorry for you.
Plus there's actually a lot of other good stuff on Peacock these days. Live a little.
-
1
-
4
-
-
29 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:
Pregnant female.
Because females get pregnant.
The text of the relevant section of the Texas penal code says "person" or "individual."
Because a female is a person.
-
3 hours ago, Sherlock Holmes said:
Speak for yourself ****boi,, we're here to support Araiza, deal with it and eat your Crow!
Change your diaper.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, BRH said:
This sounds a lot like the folks who were arguing Mac Jones would turn into Josh Allen because they had the same stats after their first 15 or whatever games.
Huh. This sounds like you are reading more into a simple statement of fact than is actually there.
-
1st ever was "Hamburger: The Motion Picture" when my neighbor's older sister and her boyfriend were "babysitting" us. Truly awful movie.
1st in a theater was "Hard to Kill" to kick off my middle school Steven Seagal phase: "I'm gonna take you to the bank, Senator Trent -- to the blood bank!"
-
46 minutes ago, Dr.Sack said:
McD has a way better career winning % than Daboll, outside of playoff winning %.
Daboll .457
McD .641
To be fair, McDermott's record was 11-12 through the same number of regular-season games as Daboll has coached (10-12-1).
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Warcodered said:
I remember when he calmly asked Harry if he put his name in the Goblet of Fire.
I remember when he calmly told Petey he wrote a bad song:
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, BillsFanSD said:
I don't understand why people think the NFL has some sort of obligation to investigate every politically incorrect remark made by an owner. The 2020 BLM protests were a net negative for the United States, and NFL players did themselves and the league a disservice by dragging this stuff into football. It's fine for owners to say so, and it doesn't matter to me if they say so in colorful terms. Grow some skin.
The question as it relates to this lawsuit is more about the NFL's obligation to investigate a complaint made by one of its employees. Clearly many posters are feeling super defensive about the "did Terry do a racism?" part of the story but that's not the heart of the matter here.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Just in Atlanta said:
Google his name - 10 out of 10 news articles and nearly everything above the fold on a regular search has this accusation in it.
In an age of Google, all it takes is a second-hand accusation. It will take years to clear his name on the Internet zeitgeist.
Is it surprising that the top news results on a topic are all related to that topic's big news story that came out literally yesterday? I'd be surprised if fewer than 9 of 10 searches for "Terry Pegula" today were looking for anything else. His statement on the Bills official page is #3 in my google news search, for what it's worth. Sure, "the internet is forever," but online search results are constantly changing, and this story will stay relevant or fade away depending on how it plays out.
-
This thread has so many instances of
"he has an Asian wife and children so he can't be racist"/
"his daughter dated a black player so he can't be racist"
that I almost wonder if you're all cribbing from the same substack or what? 🤨
-
2
-
-
Just now, NoHuddleKelly12 said:
But you realize it won’t be the government asked to decide on the accuracy of those statements, right? It will be a 6-12 person civil jury made up of people like you and me…I would hope they are in fact bound by those presumptions, otherwise they don’t even need to hear any evidence (which in turn must pass basic rules of reliability/admissibility) first? Of course you’re entitled to your opinions, but I’m just asking the board at large to consider that what happens in the court of public opinion often turns out to be premature and just flat wrong after legal process has wrapped.
That jury will be acting on behalf of the government, and they will be given detailed instructions on their responsibilities by a judge. Just clarifying that due process is for real courts, not the court of public opinion, and I also know Terry Pegula and the NFL are perfectly capable of sticking up for themselves.
-
39 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:
Respectfully, it should—otherwise we pillory others based on anything said by anyone regardless of source or any semblance of reliability? That’s something we should all push back against, regardless of your opinions.
Nah, people are absolutely free to make their own private determination as to the reliability of sources and accusations in publicly-reported stories like this one. Due process is for government, period. I'm withholding judgment on this particular case as of now, but I'm by no means bound by a "presumption of facts in [anyone's] favor."
-
4 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:
I’m confused—you asked why we should start with the default of believing a defendant over an allegation to start…so I explained why that’s fundamental due process?
Whether any of us individually believe the alleged quote attributed to Pegula has nothing to due with legal due process.
-
2 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:
Trotter heard the comment second hand from a reporter who is anonymous in the lawsuit. He did not hear it from Pegula himself.
It may be the same with Jones; haven't seen that bit of the suit.
That part came from an alleged conversation directly between Trotter and Jones at the Hall of Fame game in 2020.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said:
Was this allegedly recent ? Can’t imagine this getting past a group of reporters today. It would be public knowledge in less than a minute.
Trotter heard the allegation from another NFL media reporter on a Zoom call in September 2020, about a conversation alleged to have taken place some time before that, probably summer 2020 considering it was in regards to Black Lives Matter.
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:
Would be shocked if there isn't a recording of a Zoom meeting of NFL owners
NFL owners meetings are often intended to be confidential:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/25/sports/nfl-owners-kaepernick.html
What's your comfort show?
in Off the Wall
Posted
That's messed up!