Dunkirk Donski Posted March 5 Posted March 5 1 minute ago, Einstein said: “solid” is a good adjective for him. Would instantly become our best WR but not the top end WR I was hoping for. CarolinaCon strikes again 1 Quote
streetkings01 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 10 minutes ago, atlbillsfan1975 said: I would be ecstatic with it being a fourth or later pick. A third would make me less enthused but would be satisfied. A 3rd round pick for a starting WR would make you less enthused? 1 Quote
Process Posted March 5 Posted March 5 If it's really a mid round pick then this is a slam dunk, great move. Still need to add a speed/vertical threat, but allows us to hopefully get a stud defender in the first round. 1 Quote
MasterStrategist Posted March 5 Posted March 5 1 minute ago, bearcat said: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/25119/dj-moore We technically need to be under the cap, by $24.5m to even make this trade once new league year starts? Or maybe Chicago is eating a portion of it. Love the player, I think re-doing his contract will obviously occur --- just getting him onto the roster, is where I'm not sure the official rules. Quote
KentuckyBillsFan Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Seems like an upgrade for sure but I'm not super high on him.. This is.. fine to me. I still think we need to add another through FA or a higher draft pick. Glad position is being addressed though. Quote
TFBillsfan Posted March 5 Posted March 5 (edited) Asking…..that’s a big salary to pick up so hope it’s a 5th or later and Chicago is eating some of the salary. Secondly, does Moore move the needle? On the surface, it seems like he’s more of a 2 or 3 type WR. Edited March 5 by TFBillsfan 1 Quote
NewEra Posted March 5 Posted March 5 11 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said: That's completely incorrect. Consider the source is 99% incorrect Quote
Einstein Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Just now, ALLEN1QB said: Another receiver for Allen to overthrow. You’re trolling has reached insane levels. ”Max 5 wins next season” ”Trade josh allen” ”Another receiver for Allen to overthrow” all within your last 10 posts 1 4 2 2 Quote
Hsker4life Posted March 5 Posted March 5 4 minutes ago, finn said: Underutilzed, underrated, gets separation, deep threat... that's what people were saying about Josh Palmer. Moore has 4 or 5 seasons with 1,000 yards receiving. Palmer does not come close. 1 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Honestly it’s probably the right move. I said putting the tea leaves together it was a perfect match. He gets a bigger role , more target share, he’ll be the # 1 but not a dominant # 1 and his contract will get better as time goes 3 Quote
TBBills Fan Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Just now, MasterStrategist said: We technically need to be under the cap, by $24.5m to even make this trade once new league year starts? Or maybe Chicago is eating a portion of it. Love the player, I think re-doing his contract will obviously occur --- just getting him onto the roster, is where I'm not sure the official rules. I think the cap and who pays what portion of this will also impact what the bears get. Curious to see what it all ends up being Quote
Cray51 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Good move. they dont have too much money invested in the WR position, Moore gives them a strong #1 with legit deep threat possibility. I expect him to thrive in Brady's offense. 1 Quote
Mod_Squad_Reject Posted March 5 Posted March 5 (edited) Can’t help but feeling this a Palmer 2.0 kind of move. Am I crazy? I guess maybe we have a line on a pick in the upcoming draft we really like. What did we pay. Edited March 6 by Mod_Squad_Reject 1 2 Quote
Blainorama5 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 6 minutes ago, RedDog3940 said: Everyone told Beane we need Moore receivers! Niiiiice. 😉 Quote
Cray51 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Just now, Einstein said: You’re trolling has reached insane levels. ”Max 5 wins next season” ”Trade josh allen” ”Another receiver for Allen to overthrow” all within your last 10 posts When the brain doesn't work, the mouth speaks stupid words. Guy is a clown 1 Quote
That's No Moon Posted March 5 Posted March 5 8 minutes ago, YodaMan79 said: They did it for cost-control reasons and to align the roster with Williams’ timeline. The idea is to have premium positions on rookie contracts during the window they believe they can compete. So why are we getting him then? I know we really needed another WR to catch 50 balls for 680 yards but 24.5M seems like a pretty spicy cap hit for a pretty "meh" wide receiver 1 1 Quote
nucci Posted March 5 Posted March 5 15 minutes ago, Back2Buff said: Hes terrible. No, he's not. he's a good player Quote
Blainorama5 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 If he's been available as much as Im reading - he's already a HUGE improvement over Palmer! Quote
Cray51 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Just now, Mod_Squad_Reject said: Can’t help but feeling this a Palmer 2.0 kind of move. Am I crazy? I guess maybe we have a line on a pick in the upcoming draft we really like. Closer to when we brought in Diggs than Palmer. However, he is a tier below Diggs was 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.