Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, ganesh said:

It begs the question on what happened in Houston.  How did that OL allow 8 sacks on the reigning league MVP...Made his work so hard by running in circles in that stadium

Both our tackles playing hurt on a fast field in their dome.. 

 

A lot of 5 man protections 

 

But that's something our line can adjust to and game plan for better seeing it now if we have to go up against them again.. we'll see more six man protections and chips and block and releases 

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, GaryPinC said:

It's a difficulty, but good GMs find a way to ID those players and get it done.  He's had 8 drafts + McDermott in 2017.  

Please give me examples to support your blanket statement. Every GM including Beane, have had a few picks that outplay their draft position, but real game changing talent usually come out of the top 10 picks. 

Edited by Flipnmi
Typo
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GaryPinC said:

That's great for building a strong regular season team and culture, but we need to draft guys willing to step up and be difference makers in the playoffs. That's where we are at and Beane has to make the drafting shift.  Seems like he's starting to tune into it with this year's draft, but he needed to shift 2-4 years ago.

 

WRT salary concerns, that even more favors the first contract salary discounts through drafting.

People say this, and I get the point, but when you're drafting 30th every year, who's a difference maker is a crap shoot. It's not so much a shift as it to be better at finding the right guys. Elam and now Coleman really hurt. You aren't likely to get a star at 30 or later, but you absolutely can't afford a bust/near bust.  Bishop looks like a winner, and Cook was. Kincaid hasn't had the impact people hoped. Beane needs to be better in the first and second round. 

 

He's never going to draft away from culture and team players. That's what McDermott wants. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, NewEra said:

And equally impressive that we still have a very good OL.  2 2nd rd picks, a 3rd rd, a higher mid tier FA to go with one of the best value OGs in Edwards.  Beane did a good job constructing it

 

On offensive line he inherited, from McDermott's draft, a franchise left tackle and that is the most important peice. The second most important peice (especially for a young Quarterback) is a center and after blowing it when Josh was a rookie with Russ Bodine and Ryan Groy (Beane's own words a "horrible job") he went out and paid what at the time was the biggest center deal in NFL history for Mitch Morse. 

 

He has spent a 2nd round pick (bust) and a 3rd round pick (hit) at right tackle and a 2nd round pick at guard. 

 

While McGovern and Edwards were great value FAs and they have built some good depth with clever scouting - I do think his level of investment on oline has been about right for a team with an established top 10/12 Left Tackle. If they every had to replace Dion then I think they would have  to consider using a 1st round pick... but my guess is that will be for the next regime to worry about in some shape or form. 

 

Compare that to WR where he all he inherited from McDermott's draft was Zay Jones. He traded a 1st and a 4th for Diggs and spent a 2nd on Keon Coleman and that is it in terms of early draft investments. After that he got great value in Gabe Davis (4th) and Shakir (5th) but hasn't allocated big assets. And it is not like he has spent big cap dollars either. Diggs is also the only receiver they have ever paid close to a top of the market deal to (the extension didn't work out as well as the trade, obviously). It is just mind boggling to me. If he is still in a job by March (I think he will be) it MUST be with an ultimatum from Pegula that by hook or by crook Josh Allen needs a #1 receiver on this team in 2026.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, folz said:

You could say, yeah but that's because Burrow has been hurt so much, and I would respond, yeah well how much does his offensive line have to do with that?

 

Burrow is just injury prone. He takes normal NFL hits and misses half the season. If he was in Allen's place against Houston he would have left the stadium in a body bag.

 

Being able to throw to an elite WR tandem means he can almost always hit the top of his drop and get the ball out immediately which more than cancels out whatever pass protection issues they have. I mean Joe Flacco has the mobility of the Tin Man and had the Bengals averaging 29 PPG in his games so I'm not going to buy that the OL is some fatal flaw for that team.

Posted
2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Burrow is just injury prone. He takes normal NFL hits and misses half the season. If he was in Allen's place against Houston he would have left the stadium in a body bag.

 

Being able to throw to an elite WR tandem means he can almost always hit the top of his drop and get the ball out immediately which more than cancels out whatever pass protection issues they have. I mean Joe Flacco has the mobility of the Tin Man and had the Bengals averaging 29 PPG in his games so I'm not going to buy that the OL is some fatal flaw for that team.

Just needs to #diagnosethepressure better right😂😂

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Disaster?  Not hardly.   Hindsight is 20/20.  They have a very solid core of players and depth which you need.  Injuries hit every team but the Bills have overcome key players hurt and still have a winning record.  I live in Indy and their season is over.  Trying out Rivers to see if he can still play.  Be happy to have the best QB in football, a top five RB and a very good O line.  They are better than you think.  

Posted
13 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

i agree

 

and i dont think OP is being fair to the team's overall talent

 

i would just like to see the priorities adjusted wrt where we allocate resources

👍🏻 


that’s refreshing.  

I was developing a hunch that @Xwnyer was your burner account used when you’re feeling Xtra Josh Alleny  😉 

Posted
16 hours ago, Flipnmi said:

Please give me examples to support your blanket statement. Every GM including Beane, have had a few picks that outplay their draft position, but real game changing talent usually come out of the top 10 picks. 

 

16 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

People say this, and I get the point, but when you're drafting 30th every year, who's a difference maker is a crap shoot. It's not so much a shift as it to be better at finding the right guys. Elam and now Coleman really hurt. You aren't likely to get a star at 30 or later, but you absolutely can't afford a bust/near bust.  Bishop looks like a winner, and Cook was. Kincaid hasn't had the impact people hoped. Beane needs to be better in the first and second round. 

 

He's never going to draft away from culture and team players. That's what McDermott wants. 

Just a few examples: late first to third round All-pro or emerging receivers:

2019 DK Metcalf(2nd, #64)

2020. Brandon Aiyuk(1st, #25)

2021  Nico Collins (third, #89)

2022 George Pickens (2nd, #52)

2023 Zay Flowers (1st, 22)

 

Trying to say you have to pick top 10 is garbage.   Sure does help, but know what you need, have the right scouts and system in place, and top 10 is not necessary once you have Josh Allen.  I'm tired of the late route picking excuse.   We are an established winning franchise.  Some years, yes, you need extra picks because of roster turnover.

 

Other years you trade away picks to move up and get that one difference maker.  Like the Chiefs did in the 2017 draft when they moved to 10 from 27.

 

Shaw, you talk about Elam and Coleman, and rightly so.  Neither one has the brainpower, Coleman doesn't have the speed and Elam just wasn't a good fit for our system. 

 

That's a failure of our evaluation system.   Hopefully they fix that. Get the people in who can get it right. Honestly,  Coleman feels like they just picked him because Josh liked him, lol.

 

  • Disagree 1
Posted (edited)
On 12/8/2025 at 3:47 AM, GunnerBill said:

The roster is not a disaster. It is deep. Brandon Beane prioritises depth in his roster builds. Always has. I would argue the Bills at one point in camp this past year had around 65 guys who could probably be serviceable NFL football players without being liabilities on the field if called upon to play in spot duty. That allows the coaches to piece together a competitive team even when, for example, you are down both starting tackles or when, for example, you have multiple safeties done for the year or when, for example, your defensive tackle room is decimated by November. 

 

If anyone has ever tried to criticise Brandon Beane for depth they were barking up the wrong tree. He consistently succeeds if that is your metric. The issue is his depth approach feels like, at times, it has come at the expense of genuine game changers. Particularly up front on defense and at wide receiver.  And when you add that to the fact he has struggled to draft true game changers it leaves the very top of the roster a little thin. 

 

That is a different roster build than Baltimore or Kansas City. They are more top heavy builds and they are not able to roll with the punches from injuries as well as Buffalo is. I'll exclude Cincy from this conversation because (while their roster has issues, especially on defense) when you lose your Quarterback for 9 games no amount of depth is saving you. 

There are plenty of examples where Beane has fallen short. A reasonable argument can be made that he's fallen short in this area as well. Look at the mid season acquisitions he has made the last few seasons. Consistently signing WRs because the roster isn't good, linebackers and defensive tackles off their couches. The theme for several years is the Bills have issues stopping the run, can't generate a consistent pass rush, and has a serious WR problem especially at the X position. Imho, the depth hasn't been good in any of these areas. Lastly, he's always made the decision to go cheap at the backup QB position. Thus far, the depth at that position hasn't been tested. With that said, if Allen goes done for an extended period of time you can kiss the season goodbye. In short, I think you are giving Beane too much credit here. He really missed his opportunities to upgrade the team when Allen was on his rookie contract!!! Now he is handicapped and has limited opportunities. He created it. 

Edited by newcam2012
Posted

I think as others have pointed out we have a lot of pretty good players but very little elite talent.   And the biggest problem and mistake is we've paid some good but not great players high end money.  That's gotta get rectified.  Beane has to get more comfortable with letting his own draft picks walk when necessary.  Based on our talent level we should not be near the cap.  I also wish he'd be more aggressive trading.  Not dinky trade ups or trade downs.  Some GM's over value draft picks.  Use them to bring in top level talent other teams are trying to offload.

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

There are plenty of examples where Beane has fallen short. A reasonable argument can be made that he's fallen short in this area as well. Look at the mid season acquisitions he has made the last few seasons. Consistently signing WRs because the roster isn't good, linebackers and defensive tackles off their couches. The theme for several years is the Bills have issues stopping the run, can't generate a consistent pass rush, and has a serious WR problem especially at the X position. Imho, the depth hasn't been good in any of these areas. Lastly, he's always made the decision to go cheap at the backup QB position. Thus far, the depth at that position hasn't been tested. With that said, if Allen goes done for an extended period of time you can kiss the season goodbye. In short, I think you are giving Beane too much credit here. He really missed his opportunities to upgrade the team when Allen was on his rookie contract!!! Now he is handicapped and has limited opportunities. He created it. 

 

Strong disagree. You are expecting depth players to be difference makers. They are never going to be that. The Bills depth at those spots has been good. To be without the guys the Bills were without on the defensive line on Sunday and to still have serviceable NFL players there is an excellent depth job.

 

They don't have enough difference makers. That is the issue. Not the depth. 

 

And I agree he didn't maximise the opportunity while Josh was on a rookie deal, although he wasn't helped by the timing of a global pandemic and cap reduction, but I agree there were missed opportunities there. 

 

This is not a Brandon Beane is great post. But building serviceable depth is the thing he does best as a GM.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 12/8/2025 at 6:36 AM, thenorthremembers said:

The WR position is a disaster.  Outside of that it’s a good oft injured roster.  Luckily we have 17.

Imagine if we had Jacobi Meyers.  Glad we kept those mid round picks. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...