Wikipedia needs donations

[Just Jack]

8 hours ago, Sweats said:

 

 

 

I've never used it even once.

 

Anytime i need to know anything, i just Google it.........it's a crapshoot sometimes cause i will get the answers i need about 50% of the time and porn the rest of the time, but i like those odds.

 

Ok, do we really want to know what you're searching for? 

[Sweats]

8 hours ago, Just Jack said:

 

Ok, do we really want to know what you're searching for? 

 

 

 

No, you do not

[RkFast]

With the traffic it gets, WP could chuck a few paid ads on the site and probably cover their nut easily. Its not my responsibility that they are too stupid for that. 

[boyst]

3 hours ago, RkFast said:

With the traffic it gets, WP could chuck a few paid ads on the site and probably cover their nut easily. Its not my responsibility that they are too stupid for that. 

Wikipedia has fought back against us saying that it would make them appear bias toward the ad revenue that supports them and could cause there to be a belief in agendas and promotions. 

 

Which I find hilarious because of the way it already works and the bias that is there by the collective that generally uses the internet. Wikipedia moderation is on par with Reddit moderation. Delusional at best.