boyst Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, PaattMaann said: ... appreciate the perspective. half full or half empty. 6 of one. half dozen of the other. lets hope we can get a full glass. 1 Quote
zow2 Posted 28 minutes ago Posted 28 minutes ago I wonder if the league regrets flexing the game to 1pm? With Cinci winning last weekend and Burrow back, this is a really interesting AFC matchup. Quote
newcam2012 Posted 16 minutes ago Posted 16 minutes ago 1 hour ago, T.E. said: Our offensive philosophy is absolutely terrible. There are only a handful of coaches, at most, over the last 40 years who would take our approach with a QB like Josh Allen. I know it's beating a dead horse, but it needs to be discussed ad nauseum. We had a 16-play drive last week that covered only 60 yards and didn’t end in a TD. That nonsense isn't sustainable, and everyone gets it but the HC and OC. Very well stated. 1 Quote
Johnnycage46 Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago 1 hour ago, T.E. said: Our offensive philosophy is absolutely terrible. There are only a handful of coaches, at most, over the last 40 years who would take our approach with a QB like Josh Allen. I know it's beating a dead horse, but it needs to be discussed ad nauseum. We had a 16-play drive last week that covered only 60 yards and didn’t end in a TD. That nonsense isn't sustainable, and everyone gets it but the HC and OC. I'm not saying you are wrong...but I think a large part of this is on Beane and the roster construction. I think if we had a legit #1 outside WR and Kincaid back, while we would still be run heavy, we would likely be throwing more and getting some bigger chunk plays in the air. I almost think, this is who our O HAS to be at this point, good, bad, or otherwise, due to the roster. 1 Quote
newcam2012 Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago 1 hour ago, The Firebaugh Kid said: If we run the ball and control the clock we will be fine. If they can't run effectively then what likely happens? More screen passes? 1 Quote
Boatdrinks Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago 16 minutes ago, zow2 said: I wonder if the league regrets flexing the game to 1pm? With Cinci winning last weekend and Burrow back, this is a really interesting AFC matchup. There are some division matchups in the AFC that will have a bigger impact on the playoff picture. The Bengals at 4-8 are still a long shot even with Burrow. Now had CIN won a couple games recently like say, vs NE it would be a different story. Quote
newcam2012 Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago 1 hour ago, balln said: Does it not feel like a lions bills matchup from last year ? really poor LB and S , stud DE out im waiting for a complete offensive explosion where Allen scores 6 tds and we hear MVP chants again 1 hour ago, PaattMaann said: I disagree we are struggling. Again, our offense ranks in the top 5 in points scored on 1st possessions...that seems to be the opposite of struggling. That seems to say we thrive with scripted plays. One could say RECENTLY we have not been as successful, to which I would say Josh threw a silly mental mistake INT last week (to which he admitted post game), that isn't the offense starting slow, its Josh being an idiot for a play. Marched down the field for a TD against the leagues best defense in our 1st drive two weeks ago. Against the Bucs, Allen yet again throws a dumb INT on the 2nd play of the game. That's not on the offense starting slow, that's Allen making a dumb decision. I cannot agree that a team that is top 5 in scoring on 1st drives can be labeled as starting slow. Trust your eyes not the stats. The Bills offense lacks creativity, explosive players, WR talent, a good offensive coordinator, and is too predictable. I don't care what the stats say. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.