Roundybout Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago 59 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Yeah only if civilians are not participating in hostile actions. Drug dealers do not qualify here. Oops. By this logic you should be able to fire a tomahawk missile at a guy suspected of DUI
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 47 minutes ago Posted 47 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: By this logic you should be able to fire a tomahawk missile at a guy suspected of DUI Your logic is flawed.
Roundybout Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Your logic is flawed. You want to nuke people merely suspected of crime.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: You want to nuke people merely suspected of crime. If the people smuggling drugs get turned into mist, more than likely it would deter future smugglers. Or we should lock them up so they can be released 50 times to commit more crime like we do so much in this country currently.
Roundybout Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: If the people smuggling drugs get turned into mist, more than likely it would deter future smugglers. Or we should lock them up so they can be released 50 times to commit more crime like we do so much in this country currently. How do you know they’re smuggling drugs?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 26 minutes ago Posted 26 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, Roundybout said: How do you know they’re smuggling drugs? Why else would they blow them up?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 13 minutes ago Posted 13 minutes ago (edited) 59 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/opioids-doctors-prescriptions-payments/ all too familiar a problem. It's a problem. I mentioned it earlier as a route for addicts to get their drugs if this bombing scheme somehow succeeds in decreasing the flow of drugs. Just as in any occupation, there are bad actors. Many eventually get caught and go to prison. I've not heard of any getting blown up. Edited 13 minutes ago by Joe Ferguson forever
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 12 minutes ago Posted 12 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: It's a problem. I mentioned it earlier as a route for addicts to get their drugs if this bombing scheme somehow succeeds in decreasing the flow of drugs. Just as in any occupation, there are bad actors. Many eventually get caught and go to prison. I've not heard of any getting blown up. How doesn't blowing up drug traffickers stop the flow of drugs?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 8 minutes ago Posted 8 minutes ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: How doesn't blowing up drug traffickers stop the flow of drugs? They're killing the grunts while pardoning the kingpins who will find other ways to keep their biz booming. 24 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Why else would they blow them up? to keep vile morons entertained. from orwell's 1984 In chapter 1, Winston writes in his secret journal about going to the movies, where he watched several war films. In one of the more memorable war films, Winston recalls a violent scene that depicts a helicopter gunman shooting at a boat of refugees somewhere in the Mediterranean. Whenever the helicopter gunman brutally kills an unarmed man swimming like a porpoise in the water, the audience erupts into laughter and begins to shout. Winston also writes that the audience applauded a scene when a 20 kg bomb was dropped on a boat holding several defenseless refugees. Winston also recalls the image of a child's severed arm flying through the air, which draws additional applause from the audience, while a prole woman is removed from the crowd for protesting that the scene is too violent and unfit for children. While Winston elaborates on the audience's reaction, he does not describe his own thoughts or feelings regarding the violent films. Winston's casual explanation of the scenes, and the fact that he is not disgusted by the movie, reveals that he is also a callous, insensitive individual. However, Winston does not celebrate the violence like the other Party members, because he does not applaud or cheer. Edited 2 minutes ago by Joe Ferguson forever
Recommended Posts