Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Put Keon in the slot.

 

Shakir, Keon inside

Cooks, Davis, Shavers outside

Pretty sure Cooks gets more snaps than either Keon or Shavers.   Cooks can play, is a real NFL WR and is in game shape. 

 

Knowing McD, it'll be Shakir, Davis and Cooks 

 

Let's go.  

Edited by ProcessTruster
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 hours ago, Heels20X6 said:


How much of it is “flop” vs. Joe Brady has no clue what to do with wide receivers if they’re not running screens or jet sweeps?


palmers been a guy the chargers have actively worked to push down the depth chart 

 

hes a role player.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Trading a 1st for Diggs was bold and worked for a while.  Still didn't get us over he hump.

For sure

2 hours ago, FireChans said:

Bro Von Miller was 3 years ago lol. 
 

That was bad luck, sure. Should we never try again? Maybe take our next shot when Josh Allen is 37, just in case it doesn’t work out?

And that legitimately is the second best thing Brandon Beane has ever done.

My point is- fortune doesn't just favor the bold. 

 

I agree, I wish we had made some bigger moves, especially at WR.  Fact is that doesn’t give you a better chance at getting lucky.  

Edited by NewEra
Posted
On 11/28/2025 at 8:52 AM, SoonerBillsFan said:

This WR Corp might be one of the wost in history.  We know it is in the NFL this season

Well, I’d have you go back to josh rookie year 

 

when the best receiver we had was Robert foster 

12 hours ago, DeepPass said:

I love the Bills but with the injuries I'm starting to hate them!

Starting? I’ve been watching since 1990 (except 2001 which I completely skipped) and somehow I always hate them lol. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, NewEra said:

For sure

My point is- fortune doesn't just favor the bold. 

 

I agree, I wish we had made some bigger moves, especially at WR.  Fact is that doesn’t give you a better chance at getting lucky.  

I think you’re missing the point.

 

luck is relative.

 

if the bills made a splash move this year, despite our rash of injuries, we would all be feeling SUPER LUCKY that KC and Baltimore and Cincy are on the precipice of missing the playoffs entirely. That’s likely the most favorable thing possible to ensure our chances of winning the AFC and going to our first Super Bowl with Josh.

 

Instead, we appear to be approaching their same boat of being a wounded animal come the postseason. Because we DIDN’T MAKE OUR OWN LUCK.

Posted
19 minutes ago, FireChans said:

I think you’re missing the point.

 

luck is relative.

 

if the bills made a splash move this year, despite our rash of injuries, we would all be feeling SUPER LUCKY that KC and Baltimore and Cincy are on the precipice of missing the playoffs entirely. That’s likely the most favorable thing possible to ensure our chances of winning the AFC and going to our first Super Bowl with Josh.

 

Instead, we appear to be approaching their same boat of being a wounded animal come the postseason. Because we DIDN’T MAKE OUR OWN LUCK.

You're right we could have put us in a spot like KC, Cincy or Baltimore and not in the playoffs. But I know our team is worse than the aforementioned. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

You're right we could have put us in a spot like KC, Cincy or Baltimore and not in the playoffs. But I know our team is worse than the aforementioned. 

What

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...