Keon Coleman likely to return against Pittsburgh

[EmotionallyUnstable]

1 hour ago, machine gun kelly said:

Honestly, unstable if they dress 5 and Palmer is healthy, then..

 

Palmer

Cooks

Shakir

Davis

Shavers

 

and only if they dress a 6th, the Coleman is the 6th.  He doesn’t have a ST impact.  We have Davis for kick returns, and Shakir for punt returns.  The only way I see Coleman as the absolute last option is if Palmer can’t dress.

 

Coleman is turning out to be possibly a worse bust than Elam.

 

 

 

2 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Cooks has been playing all year and should immediately be a top target. I don’t care. Do it.

 

I was just commenting on the state of the room, not necessarily a pecking order. It’s just wild. 

[Success]

1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Put Keon in the slot.

 

Shakir, Keon inside

Cooks, Davis, Shavers outside

 

I'd like to nominate you to be our new OC.

 

[NewEra]

4 hours ago, FireChans said:

Fortune favors the bold

The chiefs certainly weren’t bold in 22 and 23 unless you consider intentionally going into the season with poor WR units bold,

 

 beane was certainly more bold than them those years.  The majority of Beanes bold moves were spoiled by injuries

[machine gun kelly]

1 hour ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

 

I was just commenting on the state of the room, not necessarily a pecking order. It’s just wild. 

No worries Bud.  Not at all.

2 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:

Honestly, unstable if they dress 5 and Palmer is healthy, then..

 

Palmer

Cooks

Shakir

Davis

Shavers

 

and only if they dress a 6th, the Coleman is the 6th.  He doesn’t have a ST impact.  We have Davis for kick returns, and Shakir for punt returns.  The only way I see Coleman as the absolute last option is if Palmer can’t dress.

 

Coleman is turning out to be possibly a worse bust than Elam.

 

 

BTW- that’s Ray Davis, not Gabe.  I thought that was obvious given his success in these new kickoff rules.  Gabe is not a ST guy.  I hope I didn’t confuse anyone.  I thought it was obvious given their histories recently.

[YoloinOhio]

Ok. Fine. Man up please we need you. 

[In Summary]

Coleman needs to ball out to increase his trade value. 

[DeepPass]

21 hours ago, Comebackkid said:

this should be on Ripleys believe it or not.   how do this many wrs get injured doing so little so quick?.

 

I love the Bills but with the injuries I'm starting to hate them!

[FireChans]

1 hour ago, NewEra said:

The chiefs certainly weren’t bold in 22 and 23 unless you consider intentionally going into the season with poor WR units bold,

 

 beane was certainly more bold than them those years.  The majority of Beanes bold moves were spoiled by injuries

We weren’t bold in 2024 or 2025. We were very content to just run it back.

 

If we had done something bold like trading for DK or Pickens or Waddle, I think we feel like a VERY lucky team right about now.

Edited 10 hours ago by FireChans

[That's No Moon]

55 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Ok. Fine. Man up please we need you. 

To hell with it. Sit all the WRs. Dress every TE and OL on the roster and pretend it's 1927.

[NewEra]

1 hour ago, FireChans said:

We weren’t bold in 2024 or 2025. We were very content to just run it back.

 

If we had done something bold like trading for DK or Pickens or Waddle, I think we feel like a VERY lucky team right about now.

Right, just like we would’ve been lucky after doing something bold like signing Von Miller.  Yes, that was a bold move and he did give us exactly what we needed until he got injured.  
 

it’s not about being bold.  The chiefs weren’t bold.  It’s about being healthier than others.  Which is often determined by luck.  
 

We could have traded for Pickens (which I was certainly hoping for) and he could’ve gotten hurt.  Gotta get the breaks.  We certainly haven’t gotten many with regards to injury the last few years

Edited 8 hours ago by NewEra

[Beck Water]

23 hours ago, NeverOutNick said:

Why even keep Curtis Samuel over Elijah Moore when he brings absolutely nothing to the table and is always injured 

You can not cut an injured player.  For a young guy, the team can reach an "injury settlement" where they pay him for the number of weeks his injury should take to heal then cut him.  The player's inducement to accept this is to possibly find another team, even a practice squad, where he can compete for a spot and get paid in full.

But for a veteran who doesn't have "split" language in his contract and who doesn't want to kick around the league on practice squad there is no inducement.

[BillsFanForever19]

7 hours ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Shakir

Palmer ????

Coleman

Gabe

Cooks

Shavers 

 

Probably not going to dress 6. We only did that once when we were using Hardman almost exclusively as a return man. 

 

Palmer got a Limited practice in today so maybe he toughs through after all. If that happens, likely Coleman sits again. 

 

But with McDermott not mentioning him on the injury report before Wednesday's practice and him popping up at Limited on Wednesday and then DNP on Thursday leads me to believe he had a setback or reinjury. 

 

I may be in the minority, but if Palmer isn't 100% - I'd probably sit him and put Coleman in. I don't think a dinged up Palmer gives you much more than Coleman and i'd probably sit him to try and get him back to close to full health.

[extrahammer]

Beane's never going to live down that WGR rant from the pre-season about WRs. 

[Sojourner]

3 hours ago, That's No Moon said:

To hell with it. Sit all the WRs. Dress every TE and OL on the roster and pretend it's 1927.

Tomlin would blow his load. 

[Búfalo Blanco]

Should be quite the circus act the rest of the way.. McBeane really know how to pick WRs.. Mmmm..

[reddogblitz]

4 hours ago, NewEra said:

Right, just like we would’ve been lucky after doing something bold like signing Von Miller.  Yes, that was a bold move and he did give us exactly what we needed until he got injured.  
 

it’s not about being bold.  The chiefs weren’t bold.  It’s about being healthier than others.  Which is often determined by luck.  
 

We could have traded for Pickens (which I was certainly hoping for) and he could’ve gotten hurt.  Gotta get the breaks.  We certainly haven’t gotten many with regards to injury the last few years

 

Trading a 1st for Diggs was bold and worked for a while.  Still didn't get us over he hump.

Edited 4 hours ago by reddogblitz

[FireChans]

7 hours ago, NewEra said:

Right, just like we would’ve been lucky after doing something bold like signing Von Miller.  Yes, that was a bold move and he did give us exactly what we needed until he got injured.  
 

it’s not about being bold.  The chiefs weren’t bold.  It’s about being healthier than others.  Which is often determined by luck.  
 

We could have traded for Pickens (which I was certainly hoping for) and he could’ve gotten hurt.  Gotta get the breaks.  We certainly haven’t gotten many with regards to injury the last few years

Bro Von Miller was 3 years ago lol. 
 

That was bad luck, sure. Should we never try again? Maybe take our next shot when Josh Allen is 37, just in case it doesn’t work out?

3 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Trading a 1st for Diggs was bold and worked for a while.  Still didn't get us over he hump.

And that legitimately is the second best thing Brandon Beane has ever done.

[WhitewalkerInPhilly]

look I want him to. I want a reason to keep him on the team. I want him to use those traits and put them to use. I want to see him take what might be his last chance and run with it.

 

But I do mean it when I say that this might be his last chance

[The Jokeman]

10 hours ago, FireChans said:

We weren’t bold in 2024 or 2025. We were very content to just run it back.

 

If we had done something bold like trading for DK or Pickens or Waddle, I think we feel like a VERY lucky team right about now.

If you trade for DK you likely have to give him that extension he got in Pittsburgh. Sorry not worth it.