Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, Billsfanatic8989 said:

Yeah I'm curious how they do with next year's schedule. Especially if they finish first in the division. 

 

Denver

KC

Chargers

Billsx2

Bears

Packers

Vikings 

Lions

Colts (most likely)

Baltimore (most likely)

1st place NFC team 

 

60 million in cap space

Posted
3 minutes ago, Psautcsk said:

Palmer is lighting it up from the bench

 

The problem with Josh Palmer is that in the 3 seasons before this season, he missed 10 games to injury.

 

This year he's missed 3 games and counting.

 

If someone accused him of being injury-prone or unreliable, you couldn't argue with that person.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

Palmer is a better WR than Hollins. I don't think that's debatable. Hollins is a better blocker for whatever that's worth and a good special teams player. Palmer can separate. I'm hoping we start feeding him targets now that he's healthy. At no point would I ever want to start feeding targets to Hollins.

 

Of course the fact that we're debating the merits of Josh Palmer vs Mack Hollins is pretty depressing in and of itself.

 

1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

Palmer is a better WR than Hollins. I don't think that's debatable. Hollins is a better blocker for whatever that's worth and a good special teams player. Palmer can separate. I'm hoping we start feeding him targets now that he's healthy. At no point would I ever want to start feeding targets to Hollins.

 

Of course the fact that we're debating the merits of Josh Palmer vs Mack Hollins is pretty depressing in and of itself.

availability matters

 

Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

Palmer is a better WR than Hollins. I don't think that's debatable. Hollins is a better blocker for whatever that's worth and a good special teams player. Palmer can separate. I'm hoping we start feeding him targets now that he's healthy. At no point would I ever want to start feeding targets to Hollins.

 

Of course the fact that we're debating the merits of Josh Palmer vs Mack Hollins is pretty depressing in and of itself.

I agree that if healthy, Palmer is technically a better WR than Hollins in a normal functional passing offense -- which I'm not convinced we have at the moment.  Also, that's a pretty big "IF"

 

And yes, it is depressing to be having this debate. 😞 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Psautcsk said:

 

availability matters

 


Whilst you’re right, that hip drop tackle isn’t exactly a preventable injury. There’s a reason they banned it. 

Posted
Just now, Psautcsk said:

60 million in cap space

You know you are free to be a Pats fan.  I mean there is room on the new bandwagon.  And since there is so much to admire about them, it kind of makes sense.  Why waste your time on the Bills anymore?

Posted
Just now, Johnnycage46 said:

Whats with the little slave boy that brings a coat out to Maye during timeouts?  What a little diva.

Elvis has left the huddle 

  • Haha (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...