Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

That's fine. We didn't need a 700 yard WR in the offseason. We needed a 1,000 yard WR. I don't regret letting Hollins walk, at all. Palmer is legitimately a better WR than him IMO, we just needed a lot more than that.

Palmer is lighting it up from the bench

Posted

I think I'm done watching. I effin hate both teams. Why do I think by watching that the flipping jets are going to beat the Pats and that we'll go on win out streak?  It's not going to happen. Good for the cheating freakin Pats. I'm out. 

Posted
Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

Just a horrible throw

 

Unreal, just handed NE 3 or 7 points there. Nice double dip coming up. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, SC STATE NUPE said:

The next coach has to be a successful aggressive coach. Would McVay ever want to leave Cali for Buffalo? Highly doubt it. But Shannahan’s tenure in San Francisco might not be much longer. He’s never had a QB like Josh either! It’s gonna take coaches of that caliber to handle this New England squad because more players want to play in that market than Buffalo. But the Bills must get a regime that maximizes their QBs ability. Time waits for no man. I feel like New England has done that with Maye already! 

 

If Shanahan wears out his welcome in SF, he'll have better options than Buffalo. 

 

5 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

Hollins isnt great but what he is, is a reliable receiver. We should not have let him go and I said that at the time.

 

Also a good teammate, good on special teams, good blocker, doesn't fumble, recovers fumbles... basically a really good football player.

 

That idiot AD Mitchell with two drops on deep, catchable balls.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

A metaphor if you will based off of how I perceive Pats/Bills offense: the patriots are the homecoming king at the senior prom. The bills are the former kings now working security at the school reliving the glory days thinking they’re still in charge 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, zow2 said:

 

Unreal, just handed NE 3 or 7 points there. Nice double dip coming up. 

The Jets have had chances. It was a bad drop the drive before. They had a horrible drop and a awful throw to end consecutive drives. They then start the next drive with 12 guys on the field. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Posted
3 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

That's fine. We didn't need a 700 yard WR in the offseason. We needed a 1,000 yard WR. I don't regret letting Hollins walk, at all. Palmer is legitimately a better WR than him IMO, we just needed a lot more than that.

Cool. Only 766 yards to go! I'll be rooting for Josh! (Both Joshes)

Posted
1 minute ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

A metaphor if you will based off of how I perceive Pats/Bills offense: the patriots are the homecoming king at the senior prom. The bills are the former kings now working security at the school reliving the glory days thinking they’re still in charge 

Except the Pats will be the Homecoming King for the next 15 years. 

Posted
Just now, Casey D said:

Brilliant.

 

1 minute ago, Casey D said:

Brilliant.

I know, it really is not complicated. You play games and win  them and you are good.

Posted
4 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

That's fine. We didn't need a 700 yard WR in the offseason. We needed a 1,000 yard WR. I don't regret letting Hollins walk, at all. Palmer is legitimately a better WR than him IMO, we just needed a lot more than that.

 

Why could we not keep Hollins AND get Palmer? It should not be one or the other. Neither are paid star money.

3 minutes ago, 26TrapDraw said:

How many balls you gonna drop tonight Mitchell?

 

First one was a drop. Second one was a bad throw.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Psautcsk said:

Palmer is lighting it up from the bench

 

Palmer is a better WR than Hollins. I don't think that's debatable. Hollins is a better blocker for whatever that's worth and a good special teams player. Palmer can separate. I'm hoping we start feeding him targets now that he's healthy. At no point would I ever want to start feeding targets to Hollins.

 

Of course the fact that we're debating the merits of Josh Palmer vs Mack Hollins is pretty depressing in and of itself.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...