Trump Summons Boebart To White House Over Discharge Petition

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

5 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

The American people deserve to know why the president is giving aid and comfort to a child sex trafficker 

So you are saying it's ok for Trump to give aid and comfort to a convicted child sex trafficker because of Biden something, something? 

 

That's some screwed up "logic" 

 

Kind of sickening, really 

No, you said that.  Read what you wrote, ya moron. 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

No, you said that.  Read what you wrote, ya moron. 

No, that's what you  said. You said "But Biden!" 

 

As if its ok. Why bring up Biden at all? 

 

Did Biden give aid and comfort to a convicted child sex trafficker? 

 

Clown idiot 

Edited 5 hours ago by Trump_is_Mentally_fit

[Pokebball]

15 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

The American people deserve to know why the president is giving aid and comfort to a child sex trafficker 

So you are saying it's ok for Trump to give aid and comfort to a convicted child sex trafficker because of Biden something, something? 

 

That's some screwed up "logic" 

 

Kind of sickening, really 

He's dead, right? How do you give comfort and aid to a dead man?

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

6 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

No, that's what you  said. You said "But Biden!" 

 

As if its ok. Why bring up Biden at all? 

 

Did Biden give aid and comfort to a convicted child sex trafficker? 

 

Clown idiot 

Hey clown idiot, if anyone had actual dirt on Trump wouldn't they have used it before the dems got absolutely wiped during the election?

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

Just now, Pokebball said:

He's dead, right? How do you give comfort and aid to a dead man?

Maxwell is alive and well at Club Fed, living it up. A Jeff Epstein accomplish and friend of both Trump and Epstein 

 

But you know that already 

[Andy1]

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Well, your guy and your crew just preemptively  pardoned family members, associates, hangers on and syndicate members, Andy. All rich, all famous.  Seems that horse has left the barn?

 

Or, maybe it’s just that logic and outrage are situational?  

Yes, the rich and powerful have often  used their positions in society for their illegal or unethical financial advantage. The context of my comment is about those people participating in the Epstein affairs and sexually assaulting minors which is as low as one can go in the depths of depravity. I’m not aware of Biden using his pardons on these types of cases. 
 

As you seem to equate the two issues here it sounds like you’ve come to the position of “if he did assault some girls with Epstein, it’s not that big of a deal because look at what Clinton and the Biden’s have done”. 
 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

37 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

No, that's what you  said. You said "But Biden!" 
 

Nope, this was you, too. 

 

37 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

 

As if its ok. Why bring up Biden at all? 

 

Did Biden give aid and comfort to a convicted child sex trafficker? 

 

Clown idiot 

Why are you babbling on about Biden and aid and comfort?   It’s weird, man. 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Nope, this was you, too. 

 

Why are you babbling on about Biden and aid and comfort?   It’s weird, man. 

Just asking you to clarify your stupid "Or, maybe it’s just that logic and outrage are situational?" comment 

 

What situation? A child sex trafficker? You are defending a guy who gives aid and comfort to a convicted sex trafficker. 

 

You are sick  

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 hour ago, Andy1 said:

Yes, the rich and powerful have often  used their positions in society for their illegal or unethical financial advantage. The context of my comment is about those people participating in the Epstein affairs and sexually assaulting minors which is as low as one can go in the depths of depravity. I’m not aware of Biden using his pardons on these types of cases. 
 

As you seem to equate the two issues here it sounds like you’ve come to the position of “if he did assault some girls with Epstein, it’s not that big of a deal because look at what Clinton and the Biden’s have done”. 

Ah, you only wanted to grandstand on the one issue, not realistically assess how things actually work.  

 

Biden granted a full and unconditional pardon to those receiving his most favored status, presumably for any/all federal crimes that might have been committed.  That seems sufficiently broad to me to include exactly the types of crime you addressed, but I'm only trying to be realistic about how those things work. As for the depth and depravity of Epstein's crimes, we agree on that issue.  However, let's not pretend pardoning/granting clemency to people convicted of murder is a walk in the park.  

 

I see you attend classes with Tipsy at the New School of Stupidity Projected.  You grandstanded on an issue, apparently don't like honestly discussing matters of "logic" when it goes against the World According To Andy.     For me, Andy, here's what you just said:  

 

As you seem to equate the two issues here it sounds like you’ve come to the position of “if he did assault some girls with Epstein, it’s not that big of a deal because look at what Clinton and the Biden’s have done”. 
 

Please feel free to point out where I said anything even remotely close to that.  I know each word you typed, the context in which you typed them, and certainly could have strung them together as you dod.  When you cannot point out that connection, I'll assume you just had a little mental block  because while you may be a bit of a virtue signaler and grandstander on some issues (and not others), you've never struck me as intentionally dishonest. 

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by leh-nerd skin-erd

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

56 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Just asking you to clarify your stupid "Or, maybe it’s just that logic and outrage are situational?" comment 

 

What situation? A child sex trafficker? You are defending a guy who gives aid and comfort to a convicted sex trafficker. 

 

You are sick  

You didn't ask me to clarify that at all, you wad. Read what you wrote, as I've suggested multiple times when you've lied or flailed at making a point you seem completely incapable of making.  

 

With regard to your latest iteration, I'm happy to clarify (or dumb it down to a level you can follow) for you.  Given Andy's outrage that the  'rich and famous...can do...what...[they] ...want..." and 'projection onto...political opponents and strategy' is evident here, yet he's oddly silent when his people are behaving in a similar fashion.  Thus, Andy's logic and outrage are dependent upon the situation he is speaking about, and he turns it on and turns it off in a partisan fashion.  

 

[Andy1]

13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ah, you only wanted to grandstand on the one issue, not realistically assess how things actually work.  

 

Biden granted a full and unconditional pardon to those receiving his most favored status, presumably for any/all federal crimes that might have been committed.  That seems sufficiently broad to me to include exactly the types of crime you addressed, but I'm only trying to be realistic about how those things work. As for the depth and depravity of Epstein's crimes, we agree on that issue.  However, let's not pretend pardoning/granting clemency to people convicted of murder is a walk in the park.  

 

I see you attend classes with Tipsy at the New School of Stupidity Projected.  You grandstanded on an issue, apparently don't like honestly discussing matters of "logic" when it goes against the World According To Andy.     For me, Andy, here's what you just said:  

 

“if he did assault some girls with Epstein, it’s not that big of a deal because look at what Clinton and the Biden’s have done”. 

 

Please feel free to point out where I said anything even remotely close to that.  I know each word you typed, the context in which you typed them, and certainly could have strung them together as you dod.  When you cannot point out that connection, I'll assume you just had a little mental block  because while you may be a bit of a virtue signaler and grandstander on some issues (and not others), you've never struck me as intentionally dishonest. 

 

 

Lehn - you omitted the first part of my sentence. I said “It sounds like…”. Your comment was equating Bidens pardons with Epstein stuff. With what basis of knowledge is this valid? There are a slew of possible federal charges someone could face, for which a pardon would absolve them of, yet you are connecting those possibilities with this specific type of crime. Are you assuming those Biden pardoned are involved? 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

2 minutes ago, Andy1 said:

Lehn - you omitted the first part of my sentence. I said “It sounds like…”. Your comment was equating Bidens pardons with Epstein stuff. With what basis of knowledge is this valid? There are a slew of possible federal charges someone could face, for which a pardon would absolve them of, yet you are connecting those possibilities with this specific type of crime. Are you assuming those Biden pardoned are involved? 

I took the part that you put in quotes, but edited my post my post to add in the full sentences you posted.  I am not sure that matters, but I certainly don't want to project the way I feel you and Tibs have.  

 

I now understand that you think I was equating Biden pardoning certain people with the horrific nature of Epstein's crimes.  I have no idea how you arrived at that, whether you thought I was writing in secret code, or if I just typed the wrong words and you noodled it all out.  That's for you to figure out---I didn't mention Epstein. 

 

I did not assume the people Biden pardoned are involved with Epstein in any way, shape or form.  I would have said that if I did.  I didn't.   I hope that is clear to you now.  Though, now that you (not me) have brought it up, it would not surprise me if any of those people pardoned--his brother, dopey son, Faucci---were involved with Epstein, who seems to cater to wealthy and famous people.   Other notable wealthy and famous people I am not assuming are involved, but would not surprise to hear that they were:

 

You know what, I started typing names and it's easier to just say the following:

 

-Any A+ list actor or celebrity;

-Any upper echelon politician from any party;

-Any member of the UN;

-Any powerful manager of money

-lots more people

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Delete_Delete_Delete]

I

2 hours ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Hey clown idiot, if anyone had actual dirt on Trump wouldn't they have used it before the dems got absolutely wiped during the election?

Why didn’t the Biden administration push for the release? Billary. Obviously… 
 

 

 

“But Biden and his crackhead son”… Put a sock in that one, Biden was never my guy. He’s a corrupt career politician, and he has no concept of personal space, clearly. In my opinion he did more wrong than right during his administration... Now how does that exonerate Donald Trump?

 

Because I for one always try and suppress the truth when I have nothing to hide. That’s totally normal human behavior. 🙄 If he’s not trying to suppress the truth, then explain why he’s calling Lauren Boebert to the situation room? Thank God she’s actually got a back bone (unlike the Dems that couldn’t hold the line). 

The problem with MAGA is they fell for the nonsense that their guy wasn’t part of the “swamp”, not realizing he’s actually just a different kind of swamp monster himself.  
 

If it’s bad news, it’s “fake news” or a “hoax”. How does this work on grown adults?

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Delete_Delete_Delete

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

21 minutes ago, Delete_Delete_Delete said:

I

Why didn’t the Biden administration push for the release? Billary. Obviously… 
 

 

 

“But Biden and his crackhead son”… Put a sock in that one, Biden was never my guy. He’s a corrupt career politician, and he has no concept of personal space, clearly. In my opinion he did more wrong than right during his administration... Now how does that exonerate Donald Trump?

 

Because I for one always try and suppress the truth when I have nothing to hide. That’s totally normal human behavior. 🙄 If he’s not trying to suppress the truth, then explain why he’s calling Lauren Boebert to the situation room? Thank God she’s actually got a back bone (unlike the Dems that couldn’t hold the line). 

The problem with MAGA is they fell for the nonsense that their guy wasn’t part of the “swamp”, not realizing he’s actually just a different kind of swamp monster himself.  
 

If it’s bad news, it’s “fake news” or a “hoax”. How does this work on grown adults?

 

 

You think the Clinton's stopped the release even though it would implicate Trump?

 

 

Not a ***** chance.

 

Trump, just like most people in politics, has some guilty friends he's trying to protect.

 

 

Nice tds rant though.

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You didn't ask me to clarify that at all, you wad. Read what you wrote, as I've suggested multiple times when you've lied or flailed at making a point you seem completely incapable of making.  

 

With regard to your latest iteration, I'm happy to clarify (or dumb it down to a level you can follow) for you.  Given Andy's outrage that the  'rich and famous...can do...what...[they] ...want..." and 'projection onto...political opponents and strategy' is evident here, yet he's oddly silent when his people are behaving in a similar fashion.  Thus, Andy's logic and outrage are dependent upon the situation he is speaking about, and he turns it on and turns it off in a partisan fashion.  

 

Why bring up anything else but the topic of Trump and Epstein? 

 

You do think its wrong Trump is giving aid and comfort to Epstein's accomplice, right? 

[Delete_Delete_Delete]

42 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

You think the Clinton's stopped the release even though it would implicate Trump?

 

 

Not a ***** chance.

 

Trump, just like most people in politics, has some guilty friends he's trying to protect.

 

 

Nice tds rant though.

Um yes, I think they still wield an ungodly amount of power within their party, and Hillary has suffered enough humiliation to last 100 lifetimes between Bill, and then being embarrassed by Trump.

 

Why would they want anything about Bill and possible relations with underage women to see the light of day?

 

After what she did to Bernie, blatantly using her power to steal an entire presidential nomination from the rightful nominee, why would she not continue to use her and Bill’s sway to prevent this stuff from ever getting out? I think she wants to preserve what’s left of their “legacy” and if Bill is all over those files, then all they have to leave behind is decades of scandal to the very bitter end.

 

I understand this is speculative, but it’s more just connecting obvious dots. 

 

Trump isn’t supposed to be like “most people in politics”, remember, that was his entire platform he ran on back in 2016. 
 

BTW, the whole “TDS” thing is about as cool as the “Let’s Go Brandon” stuff. I mean by all means continue to use it in every other sentence, it’s an excellent counterpoint to apparently everything judging by your posts… I admire your commitment to the bit though, even got it in your screen name there, that’s cute. 

 

[Niagara Bill]

6 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I don’t know if Trump did what he is accused of or not.  The outcome of a civil trail on an allegations decades in the past doesn’t move me one way or the other.  In a different, less liberal part of the world, then outcome of the same trial where Trump prevails leaves in the same spot.   Oh, and if Trump is successful in his fight to overturn the verdict, I still won’t know one way or the other….and you’ll still believe. 
 

However….when money, power and politics collide, I am very naturally cynical of who is saying what, and why.    In that regard, Mup, I think I’m pretty much middle of the road on how most people view these things.    
 

As for believing woman who allege sexual assault, I agree with you.   I don’t agree 100% of the time, and again, I view criminal v civil differently. 

 

At the end of the day though, it still seems an awful lot to me like people are willing to look past the glaring issues of their own party while passing judgement on the opposition.  Did Harris partnering with Clinton cause you to sit on the sidelines?  I’m betting no, and I don’t judge that, I just find it sort of interesting.   
 

Oh, and I SMDH! 
 

 

 

We all have some things we regret or found ourselves in situations we wish we were not. I am unsure whether trump was in the league of Epstein, but likely he was there, and should he have blown a whistle, 20 yrs later the answer is different. What other more powerful people were there? This is bigger than trump...it caused Epstein to commit suicide on orders or he was done in! Who knows. Trump maybe to. 

The whole espionage scene is filled with degenerates and has been forever, look at the British spies in MI6, and this is money laundering, spy stuff. Over trumps head. He was not trustworthy enough to be involved deeply. His mouth could never be trusted.

Look we all have been there and made choices, but we were perhaps still in that location and did nothing. 

But IMHO, this runs much deeper than trump. People we don't know. Hell do you think Bill C only got 1 bj in his life. Or Bill Gates, or Musk, or 20 other billionaires. 

I suspect we shall never know...too bad...

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

39 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Why bring up anything else but the topic of Trump and Epstein? 
 

Because I find the human element of these discussions interesting——how people rationalize hypocrisy (or in your case, the outright fabrication in your posts) especially when it comes to politics.   

Why did you lie about what I said? 

 

39 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

 

You do think its wrong Trump is giving aid and comfort to Epstein's accomplice, right? 

You keep using this phrase.  Use your words to describe what “aid and comfort” mean to you.  

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Because I find the human element of these discussions interesting——how people rationalize hypocrisy (or in your case, the outright fabrication in your posts) especially when it comes to politics.   

Why did you lie about what I said? 

 

You keep using this phrase.  Use your words to describe what “aid and comfort” mean to you.  

Lied? How? 

 

You are the one obfuscating to protect a sex trafficking protector