Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This thread is always fun because Biden had 4 years to release the list and y'all actually believe Trump was on the list but Biden went out of his way to protect Trump. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

This thread is always fun because Biden had 4 years to release the list and y'all actually believe Trump was on the list but Biden went out of his way to protect Trump. 

 

 

 

Yep, Biden protected Trump...

 

In fact, Biden's entire DOJ protected Trump...

 

The question is, why would Biden and Harris protect Trump?

 

To this day, neither Biden nor Harris will mention Trump being in the Epstein files...

 

Strange lol...

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I honestly don’t believe there is a line that Trump could cross that would cost him the support of many of the posters on this board. 
 

Fraudster? Conman? Child rapist? Murderer of hundreds of thousands of children? 
 

Nah, they’ll still support him. Hell, if he shot their kids, they’d probably assume their kids deserved it. 

  • Agree 4
Posted
25 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I honestly don’t believe there is a line that Trump could cross that would cost him the support of many of the posters on this board. 
 

Fraudster? Conman? Child rapist? Murderer of hundreds of thousands of children? 
 

Nah, they’ll still support him. Hell, if he shot their kids, they’d probably assume their kids deserved it. 

Pathetic.

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I honestly don’t believe there is a line that Trump could cross that would cost him the support of many of the posters on this board. 
 

Fraudster? Conman? Child rapist? Murderer of hundreds of thousands of children? 
 

Nah, they’ll still support him. Hell, if he shot their kids, they’d probably assume their kids deserved it. 

Once a political figure becomes tied to someone’s personal identity, any criticism of him gets interpreted as criticism of them. That’s why even objectively awful behavior gets reframed as “lies from the liberal media.” It protects supporters from confronting the possibility that they backed someone who is, on a basic human level, a terrible person. So to echo your statements nothing would change how they view him. 

Edited by Mikie2times
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

I honestly don’t believe there is a line that Trump could cross that would cost him the support of many of the posters on this board. 
 

Fraudster? Conman? Child rapist? Murderer of hundreds of thousands of children? 
 

Nah, they’ll still support him. Hell, if he shot their kids, they’d probably assume their kids deserved it. 

You’ve been holding out on us. Utter brilliance. A true gem. Welcome back! 
 

good god

Posted
1 hour ago, Mikie2times said:

Once a political figure becomes tied to someone’s personal identity, any criticism of him gets interpreted as criticism of them. That’s why even objectively awful behavior gets reframed as “lies from the liberal media.” It protects supporters from confronting the possibility that they backed someone who is, on a basic human level, a terrible person. So to echo your statements nothing would change how they view him. 

 

On 6/24/2025 at 5:31 PM, Mikie2times said:

 

I guarantee the Iranian ability to generate Nuclear weapons is still present and the following months will prove that. It might only take days.  If I'm wrong I will never post in the PPP forum again.

 

How confident are you?

Don’t be going back on your word now. Never a good look. 
 

The “it might only take days” part was especially fun. The “how confident are you?” part was also a nice touch. 

×
×
  • Create New...