NewEra Posted Monday at 10:24 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:24 PM 3 hours ago, starrymessenger said: I think NE did it to spite us. Seriously the guy blows hot and cold but when on he can get sacks in bunches. Unbelievable trade for KC considering what they gave up and their need for someone to rush the passer. Why would trading for him be in spite of us? Were we trying to land him? 2 hours ago, TFBillsfan said: The Bills will have the majority of NFL fans rooting for them to beat KC. Otherwise, looking at their schedule, I’m not sure anyone else beats them in the regular season. I don’t see Pitt having the fire power to keep up with them. Other than their loss to us, I think Denver will take them out week 18 in Denver. Pittsburgh also has a solid chance. Might be the 2 best defenses in the league to end the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted Monday at 10:29 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:29 PM 3 minutes ago, NewEra said: Pittsburgh also has a solid chance. Might be the 2 best defenses in the league to end the season. The only problem is that by then both Watt and Cam Heyward will be hurt. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted Monday at 10:33 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:33 PM lol Clowney come on…. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starrymessenger Posted Monday at 10:37 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:37 PM Just now, NewEra said: Why would trading for him be in spite of us? Were we trying to land him? No, not to my knowledge. It was not meant to be taken seriously, not even as speculation. The idea was that NE would send KC what they need (and for virtually no return) to better KC's chances against us, "us" being a division rival. I should say though I am surprised they would just give away somebody who can rush the passer. Sure he was probably unhappy not getting many opportunities to show his stuff on the Pats in a year where he needs to impress but for nothing? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted Monday at 10:42 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:42 PM LOL. “OMG. We traded with Chiefs and they picked Xavier Worthy!!! We’re done…done I tell you!!” Get a grip, folks. This guy is 1/11th 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted Monday at 10:46 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:46 PM 8 minutes ago, starrymessenger said: No, not to my knowledge. It was not meant to be taken seriously, not even as speculation. The idea was that NE would send KC what they need (and for virtually no return) to better KC's chances against us, "us" being a division rival. I should say though I am surprised they would just give away somebody who can rush the passer. Sure he was probably unhappy not getting many opportunities to show his stuff on the Pats in a year where he needs to impress but for nothing? Makes sense now 👍🏻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Noggin Posted Monday at 10:55 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:55 PM 3 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Teams like Tennessee and New England aren't competing. They don't care who is offering. It's not like they're worried about KC beating them in the Playoffs. Also isn't KC's front office built on the NE model by Scott Pioli et al? Coaching trees are a thing, but so are front office trees. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted Monday at 11:00 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:00 PM Apparently the Bills weren’t interested? No reason to take KC’s 66th rounder. Didn’t want to trade in the division maybe ? Seems like a cheap way to add a player at a need position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted Tuesday at 12:08 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:08 AM Oh thank god their defense was their clear weakness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted Tuesday at 04:06 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:06 AM 5 hours ago, Boatdrinks said: Apparently the Bills weren’t interested? No reason to take KC’s 66th rounder. Didn’t want to trade in the division maybe ? Seems like a cheap way to add a player at a need position. We don't need another situational pass rusher. We have like 3 of those, and yes I'm including Von in that mix. The one position I want Beane to add is a big DT. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsatlastin2018 Posted Tuesday at 04:17 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:17 AM 11 hours ago, That's No Moon said: It's not a hard and fast rule. Women named Chastity for example. The universe could have a sense of irony though. OR… during my first week at the U, so looong ago,young lady introduces yourself as: ”Virginia. That’s virgin for short, but not for long!” 😜 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted Tuesday at 04:42 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:42 AM The Chiefs are going all-in to try for the unprecedented threepeat. Right now I think any team in the NFCN except probably the Bears could beat them, but in the AFC at least UFN the Chiefs are the team to beat. The Chiefs are giving up quite a few future draft picks to get players who won't help much going forward, or even be on the team at all. They'll pay for that over the next two years, while the Bills continue to reach another peak. Sometime between 2024, 2025, and 2026, it's all going to come together for the Bills. (Hey, maybe all three years, right? Maybe it's the Bills who get the threepeat.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookie Man Posted Tuesday at 05:05 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:05 AM Uche wally. Uche bang bang. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted Tuesday at 05:34 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:34 AM 12 hours ago, HansLanda said: WHY DOES ANYONE (not the Bills, obv lol) TRADE WITH KC Because sometimes teams are too stupid to realize they're sleeping with the enemy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan_34 Posted Wednesday at 12:08 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:08 PM On 10/28/2024 at 1:49 PM, ToGoGo said: It tells me the Chiefs don’t think they’re good enough as is to win this year. What you guys see as a strength I see as a sign of nervousness from them. They are undefeated… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billl Posted Wednesday at 01:25 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:25 PM On 10/28/2024 at 11:42 PM, Utah John said: The Chiefs are going all-in to try for the unprecedented threepeat. Right now I think any team in the NFCN except probably the Bears could beat them, but in the AFC at least UFN the Chiefs are the team to beat. The Chiefs are giving up quite a few future draft picks to get players who won't help much going forward, or even be on the team at all. They'll pay for that over the next two years, while the Bills continue to reach another peak. Sometime between 2024, 2025, and 2026, it's all going to come together for the Bills. (Hey, maybe all three years, right? Maybe it's the Bills who get the threepeat.) The Chiefs have given up a 2025 5th round pick and a 2026 6th round pick. The Bills gave up a 2025 3rd round pick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted Thursday at 05:24 AM Share Posted Thursday at 05:24 AM 15 hours ago, Billl said: The Chiefs have given up a 2025 5th round pick and a 2026 6th round pick. The Bills gave up a 2025 3rd round pick. The Chiefs also gave up a lot more money that will hurt their cap space next year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.