Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

I happened to look up prednisone side effects in men  with Duck Duck Go. I looked at the Mayo clinic  web site that came up.  Bruising was not on there.  Mayo Clinic appears to be more reliable than GoodRx.

 

Again, did you see Biden's speech?  He mumbles, slurs, talks so softly he ca't be heard, yells, and says Americagotit instead of America. Also  his Polygrip  isn't working and several times he had that "Fire Marshal Bill"look.

Edited by Wacka
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, Wacka said:

I happened to look up prednisone side effects in men  with Duck Duck Go. I looked at the Mayo clinic  web site that came up.  Bruising was not on there.  Mayo Clinic appears to be more reliable than GoodRx.

ok, moron it is.  Just for giggles ask your transplant doc or midlevel next time you get a check up.  you said you get blood work every month.  did you notice an elevated WBC?  know what that's from?  The best source would be a pharmacology text but you likely wouldn't understand.  glucocoticoids hav myriad side effects.  Cleveland clinic didn't include all of them in this cartoon article.  look in the PDR or read this simplified piece.  It would be really smart to know the potential side effects of your meds.

https://connectedrheumatology.com/prednisone-side-effects/

Chronic side effects

"Along with the potential prednisone side effects that can occur right away, a number of issues can occur years later. 

With prolonged use, the skin becomes thinner and more prone to bruising. This is especially true for the skin on the forearms and hands"

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
19 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

did you look up prednisone's side effects?

@IYKYK   I would think you could go to any library in Amerigotit and have a lipeearyian point you in the direction of a presnostrasource that can tell you the side effects of virtually any drug. 
 

Be careful though, some medical conditions are profoundly hidden from the Amerigotit public. 

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, IYKYK said:

Honest question teef. Do you think tapper calling him a white man was a simple mistake? What is your opinion on the actual quote? Curious minds want to know. 

I’m not sure why/how that mistake was made,  but that has no bearing on the actual news.  How how many months were people gaslit into thinking that j6 was a democratic hoax, and if you find the j6 bomber, it will break the story wide open.  It’s didn’t. It actually proved the opposite.  That’s the important news to me. 

Edited by teef
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted

 

This is hilariously stupid and ignorant. They make a statement of fact but come out a conclusion that anyone who understands statistics in a minimal sense would not come. There are several more likely explanations then the men had an "easier" time getting in.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

 

This is hilariously stupid and ignorant. They make a statement of fact but come out a conclusion that anyone who understands statistics in a minimal sense would not come. There are several more likely explanations then the men had an "easier" time getting in.

splain...if there are 50 spots for 100 male applicants, and 50 spots for 200 female applicants, who has better odds under DEI.?  without DEI, there are 100 spots for 300 applicants , regardless of gender  (numbers are for illustrative purposes, not precision).  male odds decrease,  female odds increase with elimination of DEI.

Posted
6 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

splain...if there are 50 spots for 100 male applicants, and 50 spots for 200 female applicants, who has better odds under DEI.?  without DEI, there are 100 spots for 300 applicants , regardless of gender  (numbers are for illustrative purposes, not precision).  male odds decrease,  female odds increase with elimination of DEI.

You are trying to tell me you were a doctor who had to diagnose things and this is the only explanation you have? Possible explanation that are more likely, the two largest majors are computer science and Math and Stats, which are both male dominant majors. Brown also likely promotes itself more to females making it more likely to get female applicants. Now if they show stats that indicate the males are getting in with lower SAT and ACT scores then I will agree but nothing has indicated that and the headline shows no understanding of what it is presenting. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

computer science and Math and Stats, which are both male dominant majors. Brown also likely promotes itself more to females making it more likely to get female applicants.

Brown doesn't need tp promote itself.  that's why the level of competition between the sexes is important  Both want admission equally..  Played well, this is a ticket to prosperity or more.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
12 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Brown doesn't need tp promote itself.  that's why the level of competition between the sexes is important  Both want admission equally..  Played well, this is a ticket to prosperity or more.

This whole discussion is based on the fact that men don't want to go to brown as much as women, which is evidenced by the fact that twice as many women applied. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

This whole discussion is based on the fact that men don't want to go to brown as much as women, which is evidenced by the fact that twice as many women applied. 

No. It’s based on less men applying. They may well want to go but know they don’t have the grades/ scores. That’s becoming common. 
your prose improved markedly from the last post. Did someone help?

×
×
  • Create New...