Jump to content

WR Trent Sherfield signed


Chandler#81

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Diggs
______  OBJ / Hopkins / 1st Round Pick 

Davis
Harty

Shakir

Sherfield

OBJ maybe on an incentive deal but rule out Hopkins. 
 

I think the Bills are going with young fast and hungry WRs. Hopefully they add one in the 1st or 2nd that can develop next year. I wouldn’t expect much of an impact year 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Magox said:

 

 

Who has time/motivation to selectively pluck these videos and then post overly-generalized commentary pretending said selectively plucked video is wholly representative of the player? I ask because it's silly and misleading. 

  • Eyeroll 2
  • Disagree 3
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Airseven said:

 

Who has time/motivation to selectively pluck these videos and then post overly-generalized commentary pretending said selectively plucked video is wholly representative of the player? I ask because it's silly and misleading. 

Please present your data as to why this isn’t good signing for a #4 WR?

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s better than people think and is a much better player than Kumerow imo.  Very solid addition- although I haven’t seen the financials.
 

The WR depth has improved

 

Diggs

Davis

Harty

Shakir

Sherfield

just need 1 more in rd 1-3.  

 

sorry to those looking for 1b.  Probably not gonna happen 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Airseven said:

 

Who has time/motivation to selectively pluck these videos and then post overly-generalized commentary pretending said selectively plucked video is wholly representative of the player? I ask because it's silly and misleading. 

Overly generalized——LOL.  

 

you try so hard.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this about the McKenzie replacement as well... Low risk move that creates new competition in the room for depth WR spots. I'm fine with it, I'd still like to see more investment on the offensive side of the ball, but having solid depth is important too and shouldn't be ignored. 

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Airseven said:

 

Who has time/motivation to selectively pluck these videos and then post overly-generalized commentary pretending said selectively plucked video is wholly representative of the player? I ask because it's silly and misleading. 

Go away

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...