muppy Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 Criminal or just batschitt crazy. Stories like this just don't seem to make any sense at all to me. Itchy trigger finger much? And a good thing the shooter has bad aim Holy cow 15 shots is a Lot of shots just sayin' Joe Mixon? He's a no class punk as far as Im concerned. Wether he was there or not he associates with someone who would shoot a gun freaking 15 times at kids. Even if Mixon wasn't home it is not a good look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 29 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said: Maybe Joe is moving some money around?? Hush Money on 3. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 Another upstanding NFL player involved in a fracas that one might consider just another piece of his storied history . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 58 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: why haven't the details come out on this? who are they protecting? Cmon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 1 minute ago, wppete said: Cmon. Where are we going? To Joe Mixon's house to see why someone isn't in jail yet for a shooting that put a kid in the hospital? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 6 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Where are we going? To Joe Mixon's house to see why someone isn't in jail yet for a shooting that put a kid in the hospital? The NFL and others will bury this. Can’t have a prominent player involved in a shooting of a child…. Complete insanity and corruption. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 36 minutes ago, T master said: Another upstanding NFL player involved in a fracas that one might consider just another piece of his storied history . this will end up as one of those stories where something tragic finally happens and it will be said by half that "we never saw it coming" while the other half says "why did it get this far?" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 I don’t even know if he was there but this dude sucks. But football “fans” got more upset about a guy taking a knee than a guy on tape breaking a woman’s jaw. Couldn’t imagine rooting for a scumbag like Mixon. 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 3 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: Why should a very public company have to keep a guy like this if they no longer want him representing their brand? They don't have to. NFL teams can cut whoever they want. Cut him or keep him. Both are fine. Extra legal proceedings like fines and suspensions for activities prior to joining the NFL is what I was specifically referring to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 20 minutes ago, Chaos said: They don't have to. NFL teams can cut whoever they want. Cut him or keep him. Both are fine. Extra legal proceedings like fines and suspensions for activities prior to joining the NFL is what I was specifically referring to. Well, Mixon faced none of that and here we are. The other poster was talking about not allowing them to eligible to be drafted (or signed undrafted, I assume). They are clearly in their rights to do that also. Just because the law doesn't lock up a player who knocks out a woman (on camera) doesn't mean he "should be able to do his job" in the NFL simply because he wants to and is available. Until a contract is signed, a rookie doesn't have a job to do... Employer should be able to place any restrictions to hiring that they want--as long as they are not discriminating against a protected class. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: Well, Mixon faced none of that and here we are. The other poster was talking about not allowing them to eligible to be drafted (or signed undrafted, I assume). They are clearly in their rights to do that also. Just because the law doesn't lock up a player who knocks out a woman (on camera) doesn't mean he "should be able to do his job" in the NFL simply because he wants to and is available. Until a contract is signed, a rookie doesn't have a job to do... Employer should be able to place any restrictions to hiring that they want--as long as they are not discriminating against a protected class. That other poster is me, and you are right, that’s what I said. I posted that they should lose draft eligibility for 1 or even 2 years where to reapply for eligibility they would have to enter and complete reform classes before reapplying. Once approved and eligible, they can enter the Supplemental Draft first, then if not drafted they would be eligible to sign as an UDFA. The NFL can’t currently apply discipline to a player once they are employed by the NFL for things that happened before they were employed by the NFL. BUT they can decide who is eligible to be in the NFL and establish eligibility standards that must be met to enter the draft. Which they already do in a number of ways, so this would be easy for the NFL to do and it’s a joke that they don’t already do it. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.