The Unreleased J6 Capitol Surveillance Tapes: As Expected Tapes CONFIRM Sham J6 Committee LIED.

[Orlando Tim]

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

and you believe ole tuck...liar for hire, love it!  Agitprop is also a winner.

When did I praise Tucker? I prefer all the video gets released, regardless who does it and we see everything worthwhile, unlike you.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

6 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

When did I praise Tucker? I prefer all the video gets released, regardless who does it and we see everything worthwhile, unlike you.

he's not showing you everything. but let's see what bombshells he drops tonight.  he starts by telling us how to tell liars .  Doesn't mention it might be a sign of a liar when your boss calls you one or his lawyers use the fact that you're a liar as a defense in a lawsuit.  I don't know but that seems a pretty good indicator.  How can you folks defend this guy?  He's now lying about lying and complaining that others don't admit their lies when his are out in court records for all to see.  OMG "lying is bad.  It's deadly".  Well yes, tuck it is.

Edited March 9, 2023 by redtail hawk

[Tenhigh]

3 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

I thought she did a nice job here.  Not sure what you posted has to do with 
DC rights but not knowing the amendment in question and listening to her articulate it doesn't lower my opinion of her intellect in the least.  Maybe this is the clip you meant to post.  I'm not an expert on DC jurisdiction but reading some of the comments after the clip, it appears there is considerable debate.  She was definitely articulate especially in comparison to MTG, Boebert or Biggs.

 

She needs to gesture more with her hands. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

earth shaking show tuck!  he interviews this guy (who was the first to use the short bus description of the insurrectionists) as the foremost expert on the Shaman.  Note that the shaman replaced him as his lawyer

https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-siege/qanon-shaman-recently-sentenced-to-prison-now-has-a-new-lawyer-may-claim-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel-on-appeal/

Now we're on to Russell Brand again.  No new Jan 6 footage shown.  Why do you all think that is?

Edited March 9, 2023 by redtail hawk

[Orlando Tim]

1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

he's not showing you everything. but let's see what bombshells he drops tonight.  he starts by telling us how to tell liars .  Doesn't mention it might be a sign of a liar when your boss calls you one or his lawyers use the fact that you're a liar as a defense in a lawsuit.  I don't know but that seems a pretty good indicator.  How can you folks defend this guy?  He's now lying about lying and complaining that others don't admit their lies when his are out in court records for all to see.  OMG "lying is bad.  It's deadly".  Well yes, tuck it is.

Who are you arguing against? I stated I wanted all of the videos and your argument is I still don't have them all? I am aware, but now I have more and if they release them to the other media companies hopefully get even more. I don't have time to watch 14000 hours but when they only release less than a fraction of 1% I know I only have a specially curated selection. 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Jane, you ignorant slut.  We all know the committee showed one side.

It's meaningless to show the peaceful people who didn't break in.  It had nothing to do with them.  Would you feel better if they showed those clips?  Why?  

L. Ron, you don’t all know the committee was one-sided, much was made of the bipartisan make up, clumsily forced and hacked together for maximum political theater though it was.   Be that as it may, you’re now advocating for censoring/withholding footage because some parts of the demonstration were peaceful?   
 

They should release every minute of footage that does not threaten national security, and the question of what constitutes a threat to national security should be reviewed thoroughly and by a bi-partisan committee.  While it may not seem like it, the footage belongs to the American people, collectively, warts and all.   Some of you people get like to be lead around like a pampered poodle. 
 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Nobody thought everyone in the capital was a terrorist that is in your skull.  Was every single one a dumbass?  Absolutely.   Were a good portion terrorists ( I wouldn't use that word personally) yes.  

 

I'm cool with all the footage being released.   I'm not cool with it just going to your BFF Tucker.  

But that’s the way it works, and your feelings are irrelevant.  Someone’s feelings are always irrelevant. 
 

Those in charge release to the sources they choose, and not everyone agrees that the chosen one at any given point in time is trustworthy.  Personally, I would reject any news source that was not working very, very hard to gain access to all the footage from day one.  I’d certainly reject any source that missed the ultimate resolution of the Mueller case, or completely botched reporting on H Biden laptop scandal—those sources are incompetent or corrupted.  
 

 

[Wacka]

Some of them should be spayed or neutered like  a pampered poodle.

Edited March 9, 2023 by Wacka

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

Just now, Wacka said:

Some of them should be spayed or neutered like  pampered poodle.

😂 I didn’t see someone supersizing that sentence, but you went and did it, Wack.  

[L Ron Burgundy]

22 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

L. Ron, you don’t all know the committee was one-sided, much was made of the bipartisan make up, clumsily forced and hacked together for maximum political theater though it was.   Be that as it may, you’re now advocating for censoring/withholding footage because some parts of the demonstration were peaceful?   
 

They should release every minute of footage that does not threaten national security, and the question of what constitutes a threat to national security should be reviewed thoroughly and by a bi-partisan committee.  While it may not seem like it, the footage belongs to the American people, collectively, warts and all.   Some of you people get like to be lead around like a pampered poodle. 
 

 

No I've said as much about releasing everything.  

 

I'm saying the one sided nature done by the committee was fine.  The point was to show the terrible, borderline reetarded,  things that happened that day.  The peaceful part is irrelevant to them showing that.  Overall it is irrelevant.   The peaceful people for the most part suffered only fines.

 

Tucker going one sided in the other direction is irresponsible.  Go check twitter and see what most buffoons are saying.   It's conspiracy city.  Antifa did it.  People saying virtually no violence some outright denying any.   Fbi caused it.  Any insane excuse you can think of rather than just saying those people, violent ones, deserve what they got.  

 

You may not be a conspiracy theorist yourself.   Admirable and rare for your party.  But those people more and more are becoming dangerous, albeit stupid, extremists.  It's a bummer, conspiracies used to be fun.

 

 

[Buffarukus]

6 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Nobody thought everyone in the capital was a terrorist that is in your skull.  Was every single one a dumbass?  Absolutely.   Were a good portion terrorists ( I wouldn't use that word personally) yes.  

 

I'm cool with all the footage being released.   I'm not cool with it just going to your BFF Tucker.  

 

i said that is the narrative. a narrative that many have pushed even as clear video was shown BEFORE tucker police opened barracades and welcomed people in. your propagandist have EVERY stooge believing a bunch of unarmed people can organize a predetermined time and date to "insurrect" the most powerful gov in the world. a gov that has successfully defeated iraq, bombed afganistan, and now supply ukrain with trillions at their disposal for defense. a government with multiple depts specifically to see these things. fbi, homeland security ect. yet leaders were taken off guard? lol suure. not a single person should have bern able to get a sniff of the building unless it was allowed..but a guy in a buffalo outfit was able to infiltrate deep into the inner chambers? with police escort i see. a unruly mob was so sophisticated in its advanced terrorism tactics it was just a mere room away from lawmakers and collapsing our entire democracy...with sticks. say that outloud a few times..but thats what has been presented repeatedly.

 

so

 

A) leftists are dumb enough to really believe this was NOT a absolute false flag in which they wanted to use politically..which they have squeezed every bit of juice from.

 

or

 

B) our gov is so fragile that "terrorists" can call in and confirm a date and time to bring down our government with sticks and boots. so close they came. thank god the cop shot a unarmed woman or we all would be rebuilding a democracy from scratch.  wheeew. 

 

everyone i talk to knows the deal. regardless of political backing. fake it till you make it. only super dedicated leftists on the internet actually think this was a full scale assault on democracy moments from victory.

 

and again. you dont like tucker getting the footage then where was the demand for footage the last 2 years for it? you all didnt care as commissions show their versions on prime time television. now suddenly there is a thirst for the rest? funny how that happens. release it all. i find it hilarious they are building there narratives on tucker personally..not much on the actual footage shown. including yourself. nothing on lawyers denied footage. nothing on the sicknick lie propagated. nothing on lack of defense. nothing on false destruction of parler. just tucker is bad. 

 

good argument guys.

 

 

Edited March 9, 2023 by Buffarukus

[ChiGoose]

16 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Who was the most ardent supporter of the J6 committee here at PPP?

 

Who constantly reminded us about their mission that was laser focused on the truth by getting all that testimony under oath?

 

That would be @ChiGoose

 

I wonder why he's been missing lately?

 

The honest answer is that I actually have a life and I’ve been quite busy. I don’t have a ton of time to devote to an ignorant fool who believes an avowed liar and for some unknown reason, won’t stop tagging me in the most inane BS you can find on the internet. 
 

Not only that, but I never claimed the J6 committee was perfect and while I by and large agree with most of their work, I do actually disagree with the way they handled some things. But that fact, like all facts, don’t matter to you so long as your feelings are validated by taking heads and political leaders who think people like you who support them are idiots.

 

But yeah, feel all superior or whatever makes you happy, dude. 

Edited March 9, 2023 by ChiGoose

[JDHillFan]

14 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

I would be most concerned with Lindsey Graham.  AOC strikes my as very sharp and very &^#$able.

 

https://www.axios.com/2022/11/12/elon-musk-twitter-racist-tweets-data

She’s either smart for getting people to pay her way or a complete dumbass for thinking she could keep it all under wraps. Who’s to say? Either way, she seems like a real champion of the little people. A fine liberal indeed. Ever caring!

 

The documents also show that AOC was billed $1,300 for her dress, but her staff was able to cut $1,100 cut off the price tag, along with getting the price of her $635 shoes knocked down by listing them as rentals, too, the Mail reported.

The socialist then failed to pay back thousands of dollars in bills from the Gala night, including $344.85 in makeup costs that had to be passed on to a collections agency as “extremely overdue.”

She also took so long to pay back $477.73 for hair styling that a a rep for the stylist “reached out to her staff and said ‘it would look terrible if we had to file a complaint with the NY Dept of Labor against Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,'” the Mail reported. It took her nearly a year to pay that bill, Business Insider reported.

And it took eight months for her to pay more than $1,000 for transportation that was footed by Conde Nast, and she took nearly a year to pay $4,602.92 in bills at the Carlisle Hotel from the evening, according to the Post.

“In addition, a publicist associated with the company that supplied Ocasio-Cortez with her rental items — a gown, a handbag and shoes — provided a final invoice to the campaign staffer in September 2021 for about $990, but it went unpaid for months. The company then identified in April that $5,579.99 worth of unpaid goods and services had been provided to Ocasio-Cortez and her partner for the event, the report said,” NBC News reported.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/aoc-exposed-for-the-extraordinary-hypocrite-she-truly-is

 

It seems on first read that she’s sh*tting on people left and right here but she’s probably just a victim of others incompetence. Kind of like how Biden had all those classified documents accidentally spilled on him. These people cannot catch a break. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

3 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

She’s either smart for getting people to pay her way or a complete dumbass for thinking she could keep it all under wraps. Who’s to say? Either way, she seems like a real champion of the little people. A fine liberal indeed. Ever caring!

 

The documents also show that AOC was billed $1,300 for her dress, but her staff was able to cut $1,100 cut off the price tag, along with getting the price of her $635 shoes knocked down by listing them as rentals, too, the Mail reported.

The socialist then failed to pay back thousands of dollars in bills from the Gala night, including $344.85 in makeup costs that had to be passed on to a collections agency as “extremely overdue.”

She also took so long to pay back $477.73 for hair styling that a a rep for the stylist “reached out to her staff and said ‘it would look terrible if we had to file a complaint with the NY Dept of Labor against Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,'” the Mail reported. It took her nearly a year to pay that bill, Business Insider reported.

And it took eight months for her to pay more than $1,000 for transportation that was footed by Conde Nast, and she took nearly a year to pay $4,602.92 in bills at the Carlisle Hotel from the evening, according to the Post.

“In addition, a publicist associated with the company that supplied Ocasio-Cortez with her rental items — a gown, a handbag and shoes — provided a final invoice to the campaign staffer in September 2021 for about $990, but it went unpaid for months. The company then identified in April that $5,579.99 worth of unpaid goods and services had been provided to Ocasio-Cortez and her partner for the event, the report said,” NBC News reported.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/aoc-exposed-for-the-extraordinary-hypocrite-she-truly-is

 

It seems on first read that she’s sh*tting on people left and right here but she’s probably just a victim of others incompetence. Kind of like how Biden had all those classified documents accidentally spilled on him. These people cannot catch a break. 

big deal...not.  in the world of national politics, small potatoes.  Nothing akin to a certain NY congressman who lied about virtually everything including his college degree.  AOC actually has one from Boston U as i recall.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/tucker-carlson-fox-republicans/

now this is a big deal:

"Things couldn’t be going better for Tucker Carlson—if by “better” you mean the universe unfolding to reveal his contempt for his audience and his personal and professional corruption. His hyped remix of violent January 6 insurrection footage, aired Monday night, came off like a TikTok for angry boomers, but without any dogs or funny music. It sampled more than 41,000 hours of security footage to reach its preordained conclusion: “Taken as a whole, the video record does not support the claim that January 6th was an insurrection,” Carlson declared. “In fact, it demolishes that claim.”

Of course, it does no such thing."

Isolated even within fox, but hey, the losers love other losers and he's their leader...

 

Somebody posted yesterday about Billsy having multiple screenames.  He seems unique to me.  But how prevalent is it?  How many folks are playing the good cop, bad cop game while calling people out for intellectual dishonesty?  Naive?  maybe but openly asking the question.

Edited March 9, 2023 by redtail hawk

[BillsFanNC]

The DOJ isn't corrupt at all. Hiding exculpatory evidence from the defense.  Nevermind that they ignored specific requests for this footage from Chansleys attorney, they are bound BY THE LAW to provide it to the defense without it being requested. 

 

But sure let's hear more projection about how democracy dies in darkness from you commie a holes.

 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

17 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

The DOJ isn't corrupt at all. Hiding exculpatory evidence from the defense.  Nevermind that they ignored specific requests for this footage from Chansleys attorney, they are bound BY THE LAW to provide it to the defense without it being requested. 

 

But sure let's hear more projection about how democracy dies in darkness from you commie a holes.

 

 

Chansley fired Watkins !   Watkins called him and other insurrectionists "short bus" people as well as other vulgarities not printable.  So there's that...Oh, and Chansley plead guilty

 

I'm sure using the word "commies" is a big seller in the Molecular Biology community.

Edited March 9, 2023 by redtail hawk

[Wacka]

I'm a molecular biologists and I use it. The DNC is the USSR/ CCP/lite.  Molecular biologists  are all over the spectrum.  We didn't talk about politics at work.  Science involves finding the truth and u getting reproducible  results, the antithesis of  the left. Commies gotta commie.  IMHO," social sciences "and "political science" should not use the word science. They are not sciences.

 

 

 

Edited March 9, 2023 by Wacka

[JDHillFan]

1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

big deal...not.  in the world of national politics, small potatoes.  Nothing akin to a certain NY congressman who lied about virtually everything including his college degree.  AOC actually has one from Boston U as i recall.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/tucker-carlson-fox-republicans/

now this is a big deal:

"Things couldn’t be going better for Tucker Carlson—if by “better” you mean the universe unfolding to reveal his contempt for his audience and his personal and professional corruption. His hyped remix of violent January 6 insurrection footage, aired Monday night, came off like a TikTok for angry boomers, but without any dogs or funny music. It sampled more than 41,000 hours of security footage to reach its preordained conclusion: “Taken as a whole, the video record does not support the claim that January 6th was an insurrection,” Carlson declared. “In fact, it demolishes that claim.”

Of course, it does no such thing."

Isolated even within fox, but hey, the losers love other losers and he's their leader...

 

Somebody posted yesterday about Billsy having multiple screenames.  He seems unique to me.  But how prevalent is it?  How many folks are playing the good cop, bad cop game while calling people out for intellectual dishonesty?  Naive?  maybe but openly asking the question.

This is what happens when you become slave to a political party rather than have any core values. You rush to the defense of an elite crapping all over those she sees as beneath her. Why?

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

9 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

This is what happens when you become slave to a political party rather than have any core values. You rush to the defense of an elite crapping all over those she sees as beneath her. Why?

 

but she was a Brooklyn bartender...really.  Santos is just a grifter liar.

Edited March 9, 2023 by redtail hawk

[JDHillFan]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

but she was a bartender...really.

Was. No she uses the status she has gained to crap on those of the bartender strata. Just because her behavior in this matter is repellent nobody is telling you not to defend it. It’s not like you haven’t advertised the sort of person you are well before now.

Did you ever state why you feel you have earned “the right” to refer to another as an uncle tom?