pennstate10 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2025/10/30/rfk-jr-tylenol-autism-texas-lawsuit/86989978007/ This is what happens when you fill the government with quacks and grifters. Pregnancy is difficult enough for women. Tylenol is the safest pain reliever known for pregnant women. Full stop. The association of Tylenol use and autism is non-existent in the best studies, and incredibly weak in lower quality studies. Yet the clueless (Trump) and quacks (Rfkjr) blather on and on. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Homelander said: A recent Instagram post earned supermodel Gigi Hadid nearly a half a million likes, but it wasn't a photo of herself or of the latest fashion trend. It was a quote from Benedictine Sr. Joan Chittister on the importance of being more broadly pro-life, not just "pro-birth." The quote — which Chittister confirmed she said during an interview with journalist Bill Moyers in 2004 — said: "I do not believe that just because you are opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, a child educated, a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is." 1
Wolfgang Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: A recent Instagram post earned supermodel Gigi Hadid nearly a half a million likes, but it wasn't a photo of herself or of the latest fashion trend. It was a quote from Benedictine Sr. Joan Chittister on the importance of being more broadly pro-life, not just "pro-birth." The quote — which Chittister confirmed she said during an interview with journalist Bill Moyers in 2004 — said: "I do not believe that just because you are opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, a child educated, a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is." No one is stopping you from paying to feed and house someone else's kids... Go for it... If you haven't yet, why not?
JFKjr Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Save the kids! Now, the McCullough Foundation’s report, Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder, reviews over 300 peer-reviewed studies and concludes unequivocally: vaccines are the dominant environmental trigger for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Lead author Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, and co-authors—including Dr. Peter McCullough—affirm that Wakefield’s findings of vaccine-associated enterocolitis and neurodevelopmental regression were not only accurate but a pivotal insight deliberately buried. The report confirms: • Immune dysregulation triggered by vaccine components • Gut-brain axis disruption via persistent intestinal inflammation • Mitochondrial dysfunction in vaccine-injured children • A temporal clustering of autism onset with expanded childhood vaccine schedules Autism prevalence has surged from 1 in 10,000 in the 1970s to 1 in 36 today—a rise that tracks vaccine schedule expansion, not genetic change. Dr. Wakefield stated: “The parents were right. We scoped the children, documented the inflammation, and described a syndrome that had never been seen before. Had the research been allowed to continue, the full mechanism could have been elucidated years ago.” Wakefield Vindicated
Recommended Posts