Doc Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 10 hours ago, ChiGoose said: At this point, with the known facts and authorities, the absolutely most likely scenario is that a crazy person broke into the Pelosi’s house looking for Nancy Pelosi and ended up assaulting her husband. If you think there is some other scenario that is more likely than that, you are just telling on yourself. You are announcing to the world that you are a gullible and unserious person who will throw facts to the wind in the service of emotions and vibes. You can claim that you’re just being skeptical, but you’re not. True skepticism requires grounding in reality. You’re just taking feelings over facts and pretending it makes you superior. You’re not a skeptic, you are a mark and a fool. Then that's all that should have been reported/commented on. Instead the left went down the "MAGA's want to..." path and invited speculation on the numerous oddities of the case. And if you don't acknowledge there are many oddities, you're a mark and a fool. Which is just how they want you. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundancer Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 7 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: So you believe it is coincidence that the police spokesman just happened to hit on the fact that he was nudist? You act like they don't have a working knowledge of who the guys is when the spokesperson speaks. You said, “Police caught on hot mic stating that they will not correct the perception he is a right winger by stating fact that he is an illegal alien nudist activist. " But that’s not what happened. You lied. Got caught. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 56 minutes ago, Sundancer said: You said, “Police caught on hot mic stating that they will not correct the perception he is a right winger by stating fact that he is an illegal alien nudist activist. " But that’s not what happened. You lied. Got caught. They knew who he was and did not tell people who he was. Listen for yourself since your reading comprehension is poor, they had a working knowledge of who he is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 🎯 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundancer Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 20 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: They knew who he was and did not tell people who he was. Listen for yourself since your reading comprehension is poor, they had a working knowledge of who he is It's funny to keep quoting what you said vs what the voice in that video is saying. You lied. You said, “Police caught on hot mic stating that they will not correct the perception he is a right winger by stating fact that he is an illegal alien nudist activist. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 2 hours ago, Sundancer said: It's funny to keep quoting what you said vs what the voice in that video is saying. You lied. You said, “Police caught on hot mic stating that they will not correct the perception he is a right winger by stating fact that he is an illegal alien nudist activist. " Since they had a working knowledge of who the guy was due to all of his run ins with the police, why do you think they did not announce it early on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 Anyone been fired over "incompetence" yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 1 hour ago, Doc said: Anyone been fired over "incompetence" yet? Interesting question. Here’s an opinion piece posted to the Fox News website: https://www.foxnews.com/media/nbc-news-blasted-critics-over-retracted-paul-pelosi-report-questions-persist-done-damage Lots of speculation on the reporting, including how NBC could have gotten it so wrong (assuming they got it wrong), why the story was allowed to air to begin with, what actually happened in the house, and why journalists aren’t out seeking clarification. All fair questions in my opinion. In a nod to Chi and Sunny D, it could have just been one large, systemic f/u where professional reporters, editors and producers simply got confused and produced a story over the course of a week and then published a fabricated version of events from unsubstantiated sources. Or, they’re part of Team Conspiracy. I would think Miguel A. and his producers would be terminated on a screw up this big, if indeed it was shoddy reporting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 12 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Interesting question. Here’s an opinion piece posted to the Fox News website: https://www.foxnews.com/media/nbc-news-blasted-critics-over-retracted-paul-pelosi-report-questions-persist-done-damage Lots of speculation on the reporting, including how NBC could have gotten it so wrong (assuming they got it wrong), why the story was allowed to air to begin with, what actually happened in the house, and why journalists aren’t out seeking clarification. All fair questions in my opinion. In a nod to Chi and Sunny D, it could have just been one large, systemic f/u where professional reporters, editors and producers simply got confused and produced a story over the course of a week and then published a fabricated version of events from unsubstantiated sources. Or, they’re part of Team Conspiracy. I would think Miguel A. and his producers would be terminated on a screw up this big, if indeed it was shoddy reporting. The more logical conclusion is they took their time gathering and verifying the information (considering the report came out a week later) but after airing it got major push back from Nan and they had to take it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 8, 2022 Share Posted November 8, 2022 1 hour ago, Doc said: The more logical conclusion is they took their time gathering and verifying the information (considering the report came out a week later) but after airing it got major push back from Nan and they had to take it down. Pay attention qDoc - you have new talking points to download: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 9, 2022 Author Share Posted November 9, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 On 11/7/2022 at 12:52 PM, Sundancer said: It's funny to keep quoting what you said vs what the voice in that video is saying. You lied. You said, “Police caught on hot mic stating that they will not correct the perception he is a right winger by stating fact that he is an illegal alien nudist activist. " Since they had a working knowledge of who the guy was due to all of his run ins with the police, why do you think they did not announce it early on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 31 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He owes the Speaker an apology not the public. You “freaks” are never satisfied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeBills Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Quite the world we've turned this into, where a "public", often insincere apology, is more "acceptable" than a sincere, private apology. *** obviously I haven't seen the private apology to assess its veracity But this is the Liberal world and how they want it. It's pathetic, frankly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundancer Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 12 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: Since they had a working knowledge of who the guy was due to all of his run ins with the police, why do you think they did not announce it early on? This is one pet theory of yours that has nothing to do with your lie about what the police said. Just admit it. You fabricated that story. 9 hours ago, OrangeBills said: Quite the world we've turned this into, where a "public", often insincere apology, is more "acceptable" than a sincere, private apology. *** obviously I haven't seen the private apology to assess its veracity But this is the Liberal world and how they want it. It's pathetic, frankly Insulting people from a stage/social media but not to their face (see PPP and Trump, Donald) is part of this world too. Not a D/R thing. Just a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 2 hours ago, Sundancer said: This is one pet theory of yours that has nothing to do with your lie about what the police said. Just admit it. You fabricated that story. Listen to the video, the police spokesman says at the end, " we have a working knowledge of who he is" hence not a theory or a lie. Your pride in remaining ignorant of anything not reported by MSM is odd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 12 hours ago, OrangeBills said: Quite the world we've turned this into, where a "public", often insincere apology, is more "acceptable" than a sincere, private apology. *** obviously I haven't seen the private apology to assess its veracity But this is the Liberal world and how they want it. It's pathetic, frankly If you walked by a Jennifer Rubin raging at Glenn Youngkin for not publicly apologizing while she was chomping on three slices of Sbarro meat-lover pizza at the local mall, would you stop and engage? Take a minute to explain why a handwritten note is sufficient to apologize to the offended party? Remind her that people devoted to a life of public service make mistakes, too? No, more than likely, you would shake your head, catch the eye of another shopper and both shake your head at the crazy woman making a fool of herself. Who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeBills Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: If you walked by a Jennifer Rubin raging at Glenn Youngkin for not publicly apologizing while she was chomping on three slices of Sbarro meat-lover pizza at the local mall, would you stop and engage? Take a minute to explain why a handwritten note is sufficient to apologize to the offended party? Remind her that people devoted to a life of public service make mistakes, too? No, more than likely, you would shake your head, catch the eye of another shopper and both shake your head at the crazy woman making a fool of herself. Who cares? You're right, I don't care in the least, end of the day 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundancer Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 2 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: Listen to the video, the police spokesman says at the end, " we have a working knowledge of who he is" hence not a theory or a lie. Your pride in remaining ignorant of anything not reported by MSM is odd You're underwater. If you'd said you have a pet theory based on some guy's voice in a video, that would have been one thing. But you said, “Police caught on hot mic stating that they will not correct the perception he is a right winger by stating fact that he is an illegal alien nudist activist. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 I see we're still playing the insanity game. Maybe I'll just join in the fun. Something is fishy about Trump's relationship with Ivanka. They seem a bit *too* close, if you get what I'm saying. Corporatist media isn't looking into it, but does this look normal? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts