Jump to content

Week 5: Steelers at Bills 10/9 1pm


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


They’re signing you. How’s your 40 time?

 

 

 

Kinda crazy...Bills cut two players who made key plays in the Baltimore game...

 

First Prince Emili early in the week who had the tip leading to Poyer's first INT 

 

Now they cut Bryant who basically prevented a Baltimore TD on 2nd and goal by taking on 3 blockers allowing Milano to make the tackle for a 3 yard loss...

 

Must have really been a numbers crunch.

 

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

So no Edmunds then with the Harris elevation? Or maybe truly a game time decision. 

 

Yeah likely he is out

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


They’re signing you. How’s your 40 time?

 

 

All the moves make sense.  Joe Gilles-Harris is a good ST player.

Thanks for your contributions to the team Brandin Bryant.  I hope you are back full-time next year taking over for Phillips.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ColoradoBills said:

 

All the moves make sense.  Joe Gilles-Harris is a good ST player.

Thanks for your contributions to the team Brandin Bryant.  I hope you are back full-time next year taking over for Phillips.

 

He is going to the PS if nobody claims him but I would bet someone does.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


They’re signing you. How’s your 40 time?

 

 

So Hodgins is clearly Crowder's replacement on the 53 man roster.

 

The Bills have elevated PS members but not had them active on game day before, but the thinking is usually that they won't make elevations unless they intend to have them active. 

 

So elevating a WR and a LB could mean that McKenzie and Edmunds are ruled out, but it could also mean they are both game-day or game-time decisions.

 

15 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

Kinda crazy...Bills cut two players who made key plays in the Baltimore game...

First Prince Emili early in the week who had the tip leading to Poyer's first INT 

Now they cut Bryant who basically prevented a Baltimore TD on 2nd and goal by taking on 3 blockers allowing Milano to make the tackle for a 3 yard loss...

 

Must have really been a numbers crunch.

 

I think the "crunch" is that Oliver and Phillips are ready so the Bills are no longer carrying 2 DTs who can't play on the 53 man roster.

 

But, they are currently carrying 2 DBs who can't play on the 53 man roster with Benford and Poyer, so even with signing Ingram I'm not sure they have the 8 healthy DBs they prefer for the gameday roster - EDIT: yeah, I counted, we only have 7 healthy DBs.  Yikes.  I hope McKenzie can go because they might need him as an "emergency DB".

 

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

So Hodgins is clearly Crowder's replacement on the 53 man roster.

 

The Bills have elevated PS members but not had them active on game day before, but the thinking is usually that they won't make elevations unless they intend to have them active. 

 

So elevating a WR and a LB could mean that McKenzie and Edmunds are ruled out, but it could also mean they are both game-day or game-time decisions.

 

 

I think the "crunch" is that Oliver and Phillips are ready so the Bills are no longer carrying 2 DTs who can't play on the 53 man roster.

 

But, they are currently carrying 2 DBs who can't play on the 53 man roster with Benford and Poyer, so even with signing Ingram I'm not sure they have the 8 healthy DBs they prefer for the gameday roster.

 

 

True enough...maybe they are unsure with McKenzie and elevated someone just in case. They could have only elevated one WR and not have an inactive WR like they did with Shakir earlier in the year when they had numbers.

 

I'm excited to see Shakir...I think this kid could be really really good. He has deep speed too at 4.42

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big Turk said:

 

True enough...maybe they are unsure with McKenzie and elevated someone just in case. They could have only elevated one WR and not have an inactive WR like they did with Shakir earlier in the year when they had numbers.

 

I'm excited to see Shakir...I think this kid could be really really good. He has deep speed too at 4.42

 

Does anyone remember if Hodgins and Gentry played much ST in the preseason?

 

I seem to remember Hodgins getting some plays there in preseason and it not being pretty.

I don't remember Gentry playing ST at all

 

I wonder if we'll see more base D tomorrow, except, the Steelers don't seem to have much of a run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

True enough...maybe they are unsure with McKenzie and elevated someone just in case. They could have only elevated one WR and not have an inactive WR like they did with Shakir earlier in the year when they had numbers.

 

I'm excited to see Shakir...I think this kid could be really really good. He has deep speed too at 4.42

They usually have 5 WRs active on game day.  Hodgins is the 5th, replacing Crowder.  Gentry up from PS could be just in case McKenzie can't go. 

Edited by jkeerie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Does anyone remember if Hodgins and Gentry played much ST in the preseason?

 

I seem to remember Hodgins getting some plays there in preseason and it not being pretty.

I don't remember Gentry playing ST at all

 

I wonder if we'll see more base D tomorrow, except, the Steelers don't seem to have much of a run game.

 

Giles-Harris is a ST player so he may be taking Kumerow's spot in that

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jkeerie said:

They usually have 5 WRs active on game day.  Hodgins is the 5th, replacing Crowder.  Gentry up from PS could be just in case McKenzie can't go. 

 

[Teryl Austin, Brian Flores, and Mike Tomlin searching for film of Gentry, just in case]

[I'll help them.  I'm so kind!]

 

 

https://www.buffalobills.com/video/tanner-gentry-makes-athletic-diving-catch-2021-bills-camp-highlight

 

 

and of course my personal fav (this play look familiar to anyone?)

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

I'm thinking he may not make it through waivers this time.  He's getting some good film on record.

To be sure I hope he clears and goes back to the PS!

 

someone reviewing that play said something about "he may not have played well all game but he made a great play there" - IDK

I haven't been watching as much all-22 as in the past.

I agree with you though

 

20 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Maybe, but Bryant > Ankou.

 

That, too

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

After the dust settles with all these moves and filling up the PS, Beane will be down to $1M or a little less in cap.

If guys don't start coming off IR soon, he may need a restructure just to get by on cash.

He just messaged me and asked to borrow 20 bucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...