Jump to content

Iran Is On Fire


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

 

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

 

There would be no need to revolt if they had a separation of church and state and a right to vote, 

 

The first amendment is far, far more important that second amendment 

 

The 14th is also 

 

"there would be no need..."

 

well they don't have separation or voting rights. so now what? 

 

how do you suggest these people remove the dictators that are enforcing these religious policies and suppressing and murdering the people who want them? there have been repeated attempts and all met with violence. none of your "more important" amendments seem to be able to persuade the brutal government.

 

so with this in mind do you understand the absolute importance of the second ammendment? would you be against arming the citizens to fight for and maintain ANY of the amendments that we take for granted? or do you still..take it for granted? its the first one required before any other would even be considered or taken, yet you want it taken from your own people. makes no sense. 

 

 

Edited by Buffarukus
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

To kill fascists 

 

Have you killed anyone lately to preserve your rights? Man, you really have a lot of rights as an American citizen. No killing involved 

 

Why do they need guns if the pen is mightier than the sword?  Walk softly and carry a big stick is also a nice saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iran is still a mystery to me. I’ve known many Iranian Americans - an educated, “westernized” group of people - who’ve told me it’s just a matter of time before the regime toppled there. And in Iran itself there’s a large educated class of younger people. It’s not like Saudi Arabia. Yet the regime hangs on, decade after decade, preposterous/backward governance after ridiculous government policy decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

Why do they need guns if the pen is mightier than the sword?  Walk softly and carry a big stick is also a nice saying. 

Because their republic is under outside attack

 

The pen has allowed them to get weapons 

 

Would they have gotten weapons without the ability to comminicate their need or our great media showing what is going on there? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Because their republic is under outside attack

 

The pen has allowed them to get weapons 

 

Would they have gotten weapons without the ability to comminicate their need or our great media showing what is going on there? 

 

We sent Ukraine billions of weapons which is keeping Russia at the gates. We fought the British with guns which brough free speech. We get it you don't like guns but don't understimate their importance you're just being ignorant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aristocrat said:

 

We sent Ukraine billions of weapons which is keeping Russia at the gates. We fought the British with guns which brough free speech. We get it you don't like guns but don't understimate their importance you're just being ignorant

Free speech is still more important 

 

Yes, we need weapons, but without free speech they are useless to secure liberty 

 

FU ignorant pos :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Iran is still a mystery to me. 

 

One of the undeniable consequences of this idiotic invasion is the total depletion of Russian weapons, and their inability to produce replacements from internal industry.

This past week, the tried, unsuccessfully, to surreptitiously supply their Ukrainian forces with additional S-300 sam missile systems.

An older system, they moved a number of them from their air defense of St. Petersburg to the border under cover of darkness, some which had been parked in the elements for years.

They did not relocate their S-400 systems.

 

Detection of the movement was easy, but it points to the desperate level of their need to supply the Ukraine invasion force to the point where they are weakening internal defenses by cannibalizing domestic systems.

 

So....What are the consequences for Iran, India, Venezuela and other regimes who depend on Russian weapon exports, when they can't even supply their own?

If I was a customer of theirs, I'd be very concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0b6e6bc9e1817ce89e116438845a1e3b

 

Iran vows to crush women-led protests with ‘no leniency’ as unrest enters 10th day. 

 

“The number of dead during clashes between protesters and security forces increased to 41 people, including some members of the security forces, according to state TV. However, the real figure is believed to be much higher.”

 

 

https://news.yahoo.com/iran-vows-crush-women-led-110253604.html

  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Free speech is still more important 

 

Yes, we need weapons, but without free speech they are useless to secure liberty 

 

FU ignorant pos :) 

 

start-->free speech rights are more important then gun rights--> gun rights are needed to obtain/maintain free speach rights--> return to start.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...