aristocrat Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 left has some anti semites in their ranks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted September 23, 2022 Author Share Posted September 23, 2022 Berserker claims he was afraid of Trump supporter so of course, ran him over and left him for dead. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 Who cares what those racist idiots have to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted September 24, 2022 Author Share Posted September 24, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 5 minutes ago, Albwan said: Stupid protestor! Shouldn’t he have frozen himself? People setting themselves on fire are a HUGE part of the climate problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 ...good. He's helping to reduce the over-population problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 1, 2022 Share Posted October 1, 2022 NOBODY EXPECTS THE JAN. 6 INQUISITION: Jonathan Turley: Why does a congressional committee care what Ginni Thomas “believes”? Select committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) left the voluntary interview with the Committee to report, according to Politico, “she still believes false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump.” Ok, so what? Millions of people hold the same view. They have a right to hold that view. There was never any evidence that Thomas participated in any violence and had simply encouraged White House and other officials to challenge the election. Remember: Democrats are allowed to claim elections are tainted, and Democrats are allowed to engage in political violence. Republicans are not allowed to even think about such things without having the weight of the politico/media establishment come down on them. Plus: “None of the media even raised the question of whether such interviews could be viewed as harassment or pressure on a member of the Supreme Court.” It is, and it’s intended to be. https://hotair.com/headlines/2022/09/30/why-does-a-congressional-committee-care-what-ginni-thomas-believes-n500003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 1, 2022 Share Posted October 1, 2022 Because they're desperately flailing, hoping to tie it to Clarence Thomas and get him removed. Nothing more, nothing less. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 Who denies election results? Jewish World Review, by Victor Davis Hanson A Democratic myth has arisen that former President Donald Trump's denial of the accuracy of the 2020 vote was "unprecedented." Unfortunately, the history of U.S. elections is often a story of both legitimate and illegitimate election denialism. The 1800, 1824, 1876, and 1960 elections were all understandably questioned. In some of these cases, a partisan House of Representatives decided the winner. Presidential candidate Al Gore in 2000 did not accept the popular vote results in Florida. He spent five weeks futilely contesting the state's tally — until recounts and the Supreme Court certified it. https://jewishworldreview.com/1022/hanson102022.php3 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Presidential candidate Al Gore in 2000 did not accept the popular vote results in Florida. He spent five weeks futilely contesting the state's tally — until recounts and the Supreme Court certified it. If only Trump had done the same when the courts (including the Supreme Court) shot down each and every one of his arguments. Victor Davis Hanson used to be a respected professor of ancient history and a thoughtful conservative critic. He is now nothing more than a hack, saying there is absolutely no meaningful distinction between challenging the counting of votes in the courts and then conceding when they decide against you vs summoning an angry mob to try to stop a ministerial process from being completed AFTER your court challenges have failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts