Jump to content

POLICE STATE BIDEN TRIALS: Corrupt DOJ/FBI/GA DA/CO SC/ME SoS: Trump Indicted 4x.


Recommended Posts

Just now, Boatdrinks said:

Total BS. Never any investigation of Hillary by DOJ or FBI. They did absolutely nothing. These types of “disputes” for lack of a better term come up often with past Presidents. A political stunt move has NEVER taken place. This has ZERO to do with rule of law etc and you’re being disingenuous or are just a complete moron if you say it is: 


Are you forgetting when the head of the FBI publicly announced just before the 2016 election that they were re-opening an investigation into Hillary’s emails? A statement that both broke FBI protocol and may have thrown the election to Trump?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


Are you forgetting when the head of the FBI publicly announced just before the 2016 election that they were re-opening an investigation into Hillary’s emails? A statement that both broke FBI protocol and may have thrown the election to Trump?

Just a stunt to “ clear her name” from the bad publicity. Hillary was never going to win the Presidency. The Dems simply underestimated just how many Americans despise her. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Just a stunt to “ clear her name” from the bad publicity. Hillary was never going to win the Presidency. The Dems simply underestimated just how many Americans despise her. 


This is completely unhinged and divorced from reality. 
 

Hillary was investigated by the FBI and it severely damaged her campaign. Then, after the case had been closed, it was publicly re-opened just before the election. 
 

And you are claiming both that this never happened and that it had no impact on the election? Log off and go touch some grass. That’s completely unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

When did the FBI raid Chappaqua?

 

I must have missed that.


They didn’t need to since the controversy was over emails which can be obtained without physically entering the home.

 

Additionally, instead of stonewalling for months, she provided the requested documents when subpoenaed. 
 

So, on the one hand, you have digital evidence and a person of interest who is responsive to subpoenas and on the other, it’s physical papers and a client who fights the subpoenas. It’s not surprising at all that a search warrant would be authorized. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...