Roe vs Wade Overturned

[FireChans]

3 minutes ago, Andy1 said:

I’m still wondering what the penalties will be for abortion or attempted abortion in states where it is outlawed and then, logically considered murder. In Texas, convicted murders get 5-99 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. Now since no God fearing republican wants to be seen as soft on crime, I would think that the poor girl or young woman (who is unable or cannot afford to travel to another state) convicted of getting an abortion would get at least 10 - 20 years in prison for committing murder of the embryo/fetus. Murder of embryo is equal to murder of a person. Are all you guys who support this ruling on board with this? This is where we are heading as a country. I’m sure the prison industry is celebrating. 

Lmao.

 

”I just invented an entirely hypothetical scenario based on nothing, HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT THESE THING IN MY IMAGINATION!”

[Andy1]

4 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Lmao.

 

”I just invented an entirely hypothetical scenario based on nothing, HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT THESE THING IN MY IMAGINATION!”

Well, in your opinion, what would be an appropriate punishment for the guilty woman? Religious counseling? A monetary fine? Probation? How much time in prison? I mean there has to be some punishment, right?

[Gene Frenkle]

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

🙄

What kind of Mickey Mouse question is that, Frenkle? 

 

I just saw a huge conspiracy post above yours about child grooming at Disney. You're ignoring this? Sweep it under the rug? Why? They're going to groom an entire generation of children!

 

Won't anyone think of the children??

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

🙄

What kind of Mickey Mouse question is that, Frenkle? 

 

I'd love to hear you tell me how I'm wrong. 

[BillStime]

🎯

 

 

[gobills404]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

🎯

 

 

Women would rather forcibly castrate men like cattle than not have unprotected sex out of wedlock

[BillStime]

8 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Women would rather forcibly castrate men like cattle than not have unprotected sex out of wedlock

Time to ban Viagra, too.

 

gods will

[gobills404]

10 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Time to ban Viagra, too.

 

gods will

Viagra doesn’t affect fertility nice try tho

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1874253/

Quote

Sildenafil had no statistically significant effect on sperm motility, count or density

 

[Dr.Mantis_Toboggan]

20 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Viagra doesn’t affect fertility nice try tho

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1874253/

 

Doesn’t matter, that’s not natural, clearly the body doesn’t want you reproducing anymore if you can’t get it up.  Doesn’t seem to me we should be playing god and granting boners so Willy nilly…

 

Im all for informed choice and term limits, however an outright ban is absolutely archaic and if Clarence Thomas gets his way we’ll be living under Shariah Law by the new year.

[FireChans]

29 minutes ago, Dr.Mantis_Toboggan said:

Doesn’t matter, that’s not natural, clearly the body doesn’t want you reproducing anymore if you can’t get it up.  Doesn’t seem to me we should be playing god and granting boners so Willy nilly…

 

Im all for informed choice and term limits, however an outright ban is absolutely archaic and if Clarence Thomas gets his way we’ll be living under Shariah Law by the new year.

Noted Muslim…. Clarence Thomas….

[gobills404]

48 minutes ago, Dr.Mantis_Toboggan said:

if Clarence Thomas gets his way we’ll be living under Shariah Law by the new year.

So?

[Gene Frenkle]

1 hour ago, gobills404 said:

Viagra doesn’t affect fertility nice try tho

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1874253/

 

 

Hard to knock her up if you can't get it up, no? What would Jesus say?

 

Oh yeah, something about it being harder for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven. Also "They can take my gun when they pry it from my colld, dead hand." Pretty sure that was him.

2 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

So?

 

I thought you people were anti A-rab.

[Gene Frenkle]

4 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

(It's) harder for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven.

 

Self quote (lame, sorry), but how do you Republican Christians actually rationalize this one? Super curious.

[Buffarukus]

2 hours ago, Andy1 said:

I’m still wondering what the penalties will be for abortion or attempted abortion in states where it is outlawed and then, logically considered murder. In Texas, convicted murders get 5-99 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. Now since no God fearing republican wants to be seen as soft on crime, I would think that the poor girl or young woman (who is unable or cannot afford to travel to another state) convicted of getting an abortion would get at least 10 - 20 years in prison for committing murder of the embryo/fetus. Murder of embryo is equal to murder of a person. Are all you guys who support this ruling on board with this? This is where we are heading as a country. I’m sure the prison industry is celebrating. 

 

i personally think the republicans are insane to push that kind of authoritarianism and are basically sabotaging their own elections by even considering anything but what the left originally said and has veered way off of. safe rare legal with a reasonable timeframe. 

 

but i have a equally insane legal question for you. since leftists believe life begins after birth. a criminal who assaults a woman that causes her to lose a pregnancy. that cannot be murder correct? if thats the case then men who do not want a woman to carry a baby to full term can end the pregnancy and face only assault charges? its hypocritical to even suggest its murder. assault charge with a soft on crime liberal DA or 18+ years of financial responsability. not that hypocracy stops anyone nowadays

 

i think we as a nation need to figure out when life begins. you dont do that with a court. you do that with medical professionals and then with congress passing the consensus. funny how dem congresspeople calling for "action in the street" when they should be calling for "action at their job." but this is a great boost for a party that has litterally nothing good to run on and dont want the answers on that question. im pretty sure it would show that many of them advocated murder of children. not a good look which is why they depended on the court to do there job to begin with. 

Edited June 26, 2022 by Buffarukus

[gobills404]

Apparently it’s legal to shoot babies now

710k thousand people and counting with  neanderthal-level logic and reasoning. This country is doomed.

[Gene Frenkle]

5 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Apparently it’s legal to shoot babies now

710k thousand people and counting with  neanderthal-level logic and reasoning. This country is doomed.

 

STFU with your random tweets. Say something for yourself maybe?

 

What's your position? What are you defending?

[gobills404]

3 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

STFU with your random tweets. Say something for yourself maybe?

Where’s this energy for @BillStime. Cry more.

Edited June 26, 2022 by gobills404

[Gene Frenkle]

1 minute ago, gobills404 said:

Where’s this energy for @BillStime. Cry more.

 

Brilliant. No surprise.

[Andy1]

19 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

i personally think the republicans are insane to push that kind of authoritarianism and are basically sabotaging their own elections by even considering anything but what the left originally said and has veered way off of. safe rare legal with a reasonable timeframe. 

 

but i have a equally insane legal question for you. since leftists believe life begins after birth. a criminal who assaults a woman that causes her to lose a pregnancy. that cannot be murder correct? if thats the case then men who do not want a woman to carry a baby to full term can end the pregnancy and face only assault charges? its hypocritical to even suggest its murder. assault charge with a soft on crime liberal DA or 18+ years of financial responsability. not that hypocracy stops anyone nowadays

 

i think we as a nation need to figure out when life begins. you dont do that with a court. you do that with medical professionals and then with congress passing the consensus. funny how dem congresspeople calling for "action in the street" when they should be calling for "action at their job." but this is a great boost for a party that has litterally nothing good to run on and dont want the answers on that question. im pretty sure it would show that many of them advocated murder of children. not a good look which is why they depended on the court to do there job to begin with. 

I generally agree with you. Dems who support abortion until the moment of birth are nuts and are not where most of the country is at on this issue. Roe allowed abortion without restrictions during the first 3 months of pregnancy. I think most people would agree with that. As you say though, it should be decided in congress at a national level so women have equal rights wherever they live. 

[Gene Frenkle]

25 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

i personally think the republicans are insane to push that kind of authoritarianism and are basically sabotaging their own elections by even considering anything but what the left originally said and has veered way off of. safe rare legal with a reasonable timeframe. 

 

but i have a equally insane legal question for you. since leftists believe life begins after birth. a criminal who assaults a woman that causes her to lose a pregnancy. that cannot be murder correct? if thats the case then men who do not want a woman to carry a baby to full term can end the pregnancy and face only assault charges? its hypocritical to even suggest its murder. assault charge with a soft on crime liberal DA or 18+ years of financial responsability. not that hypocracy stops anyone nowadays

 

i think we as a nation need to figure out when life begins. you dont do that with a court. you do that with medical professionals and then with congress passing the consensus. funny how dem congresspeople calling for "action in the street" when they should be calling for "action at their job." but this is a great boost for a party that has litterally nothing good to run on and dont want the answers on that question. im pretty sure it would show that many of them advocated murder of children. not a good look which is why they depended on the court to do there job to begin with. 

 

In one case, the woman makes a completely personal decision, about something that's on with her body.

 

In the other case, someone else makes that choice for her (much like decrepit boomers are doing now). Charge that person with whatever you like, but it's still super schitty and that person should be locked up.

 

I think what you're missing is the idea that the person with the thing going on in her body should be able to decide what she's going to do with the thing that's going on in her body. That's it. It's simple. Wtf do you care what somebody else does? Why do you get to say? So you can sleep well? Piss off.

[FireChans]

14 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

In one case, the woman makes a completely personal decision, about something that's on with her body.

 

In the other case, someone else makes that choice for her (much like decrepit boomers are doing now). Charge that person with whatever you like, but it's still super schitty and that person should be locked up.

 

I think what you're missing is the idea that the person with the thing going on in her body should be able to decide what she's going to do with the thing that's going on in her body. That's it. It's simple. Wtf do you care what somebody else does? Why do you get to say? So you can sleep well? Piss off.

“Why do you care if someone else gets murdered.”

 

man you’re killing it today. PUN INTENDED