Jump to content

BREAKING: SCOTUS to overturn Roe?


Recommended Posts

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

Keep digging "bro".  You're making some solid arguments here today. (sarcasm)

 

Yea, bro - you're KILLING it.

 

Why would WE only REGULATE a uterus?

 

What's a woman?

 

A THING FOR YOU TO CONTROL.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

No, it is not. You're dodging.

 

Why would we ONLY regulate a WOMENs body?

 

Tell us oh mighty one... tell us!

 

Because NOBODY is talking about a woman's body but you and your friends on the Left.  Can you guess which body we ARE talking about?  See if you can.  Think for a second.  You can do it.  I know you can! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Because NOBODY is talking about a woman's body but you and your friends on the Left.  Can you guess which body we ARE talking about?  See if you can.  Think for a second.  You can do it.  I know you can! 

 

OH, is that how you compartmentalize it?  Men have ZERO responsibility for that THING inside her BODY? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

OH, is that how you compartmentalize it?  Men have ZERO responsibility for that THING inside her BODY? 

Now what? You realize that same point can be used as an ANTI-abortion argument. For example, should a woman have complete control over whether a man's baby is destroyed? 

 

Don't hurt yourself with all this high-level moral philosophy stuff.  Your sweet spot is anti-Trump memes. 

 

Bye Bye

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Now what? You realize that same point can be used as an ANTI-abortion argument. For example, should a woman have complete control over whether a man's baby is destroyed? 

 

Don't hurt yourself with all this high-level moral philosophy stuff.  Your sweet spot is anti-Trump memes. 

 

Bye Bye

 

Oh, did it get too HOT in the KITCHEN for you precious?

 

Amazing you couldn't address why it only makes sense to manage a UTERUS and not SPERM.

 

Typical... can never deal with issues at the SOURCE.

 

Run away big guy...

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

.

You know who gets abortions? People you know….people you are close to….you just don’t know about it. How many shotgun weddings have you been to in the last 40 years? You know ….people you know….not many huh? What everyone perfected birth control and pulling out?

 

All these red states…filled with the pious…..you know what’s gonna happen when their daughter…girlfriend…whomever gets unexpectedly pregnant? They are not going show up at high school and carry to term….show up at the adoption agency with a halo…..Nope….they are gonna disappear for a weekend to go visit their cousin/aunt/friend….in a blue state…and they will hope nobody knows….and they will rationalize that they made a mistake and are special

Edited by TH3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TH3 said:

You know who gets abortions? People you know….people you are close to….you just don’t know about it. How many shotgun weddings have you been to in the last 40 years? You know ….people you know….not many huh? What everyone perfected birth control and pulling out?

 

All these red states…filled with the pious…..you know what’s gonna happen when their daughter…girlfriend…whomever gets unexpectedly pregnant? They are not going show up at high school and carry to term….show up at the adoption agency with a halo…..Nope….they are gonna disappear for a weekend to go visit their cousin/aunt/friend….in a blue state…and they will hope nobody knows….and they will rationalize that they made a mistake and are special

All excellent points.  So go ahead and make that argument at the State House wherever you live. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Good Riddance to Roe v. Wade and Its Culture of Coercion
By Laura Hollis

 

As pretty much everyone knows by now unless they're living on a deserted island with no Wi-Fi, someone within the U.S. Supreme Court breached professional protocol and leaked a copy of a draft opinion. The draft, written by Justice Samuel Alito, purports to show a 5-4 majority of the Court ready to overrule the 1973 case of Roe v. Wade and declare that there is no federal constitutional right to an abortion.

 

Clearly, the leaker is looking to foment outrage and create public pressure on one or more of the five justices to change their votes. Right on cue -- and with pre-printed signs -- the rage mobs are gathering in front of the Supreme Court and elsewhere around the country. One such protest in California turned violent, and across the social mediaverse, there are calls for "revolution." Americans are bracing for riots like those we saw in the summer of 2020 after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis.

 

This is despicable and hypocritical (remember all the posturing about "saving our democracy" and "respect for our institutions"?), but typical. Also typical is the manipulation of data to control the media narrative. One such tidbit is the constant refrain that "70% of Americans do not want Roe overturned." That part is true. But conveniently left out is the rest of the poll, showing that 65% of Americans also think abortion should be illegal in most or all cases in the second trimester, and that fully 80% think abortion should be illegal in the third trimester.

 

The abortion industry as it exists under Roe is grossly out of touch with Americans' views.

 

There are many reasons why Roe needs to go, not least saving the lives of unborn children. But overturning Roe should also remediate the coercion that has crept into our lives since abortion was declared to be a constitutional right.

 

By definition, "rights" create corresponding obligations, some mandatory and some prohibitory. If I have a "right" to walk down the street, then you have an obligation to let me do so. If I have a "right" to clean water, then you have an obligation not to pollute it.

 

Few rights are absolute, however. The American legal system tends to balance rights, especially when they potentially conflict.

 

The abortion lobby refuses to accept these limits.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/laurahollis/2022/05/05/good-riddance-to-roe-v-wade-and-its-culture-of-coercion-n2606789

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

All excellent points.  So go ahead and make that argument at the State House wherever you live. 

So SCOTUS ….we’ll the GOP stuffed SCOTUS…says that the Feds have no say…either way….why not 

“return the decision” to the state house… let the locals decide. Why not do one better and just let the woman herself decide? I mean that’s Alito’s reasoning …..correct?

6 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

1 Use birth control . If that fails ..

 

2 Take a plan B 

 

problem solved in 99% of cases.  
 
Letting States ( the people) decide is not a huge deal folks. 

Plan B is going to be illegal in those red states Einstein …You literally just made the liberals point.

Edited by TH3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, TH3 said:

 

Plan B is going to be illegal in those red states Einstein …You literally just made the liberals point.

 

 

So,

 

the liberal's point is, it has to be available in all 50 states or it's not fair.

 

😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure it's been impressed how serious the leaking of a SCOTUS draft opinion is. It's one of the worst possible things that can happen in our government, and that statement would only be slightly mitigated if it turned out to be the work of a hacker rather than a source inside the Court itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

So,

 

the liberal's point is, it has to be available in all 50 states or it's not fair.

 

😂

Choice of the individual? Why do you think the states are more important than the person? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...