Jump to content

TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - Completed!


Virgil

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Logic said:


He dropped a lot of passes in 2020, but not last year. He wasn’t even in the top 20 in dropped passes in 2021. 
 

Stefon Diggs was, though.

 

https://scores.nbcsports.com/fb/leaders.asp?type=Receiving&range=NFL&rank=232

shows you what i know 🤷‍♂️ lol

6 minutes ago, Virgil said:

With being only 2 picks away, there’s 3 players I’d be okay with the Bills taking.  

can we start voting... my F5 is hanging on by a thread lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

The flaw in this mock is with the Bills pick being a User Vote, the Bills have to stay put at 25 while all these other teams are moving up. I almost expect Beane to do the same as I don't think he's just going to sit there and hope the CB prospect he likes will fall to him at 25.

If Beane moves up to draft a corner he is a rank amateur and an idiot. 

 

No offense meant and as always, jmo.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cards, at pick #23, select Kenyon Green - G - Texas A&M. Green might be able to play OT in a pinch, and is a good fit on a team that needs inside OL help. Green played and fared well against the best players in college football. 

I AM however surprised that there were no offers to trade down.

 

@Just Joshin'is on the clock.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

If Beane moves up to draft a corner he is a rank amateur and an idiot. 

 

No offense meant and as always, jmo.

 

If he wants one of the top four CB's, better chance that they won't be there at 25 than it is they are. I'm not saying a massive move for a Gardner or Stingley is likely (though I don't think it's a definite no), calling him an "idiot" to make a move up a few picks to guarantee he gets the guy he wants is ridiculous.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, NewEra said:

And that’s ok.  It’s an exercise for fun.  
 

I find a flaw in your rational.  You’re operating under the assumption that the only position Beane values in rd 1 of this draft is corner.  I don’t think that’s the case. We were “in on Gilmore up before he signed a couple days ago.  If we signed Gilmore, would we still have been corner only if we had signed him?  So now that we didn’t sign gilmore, are there any other free agents that can fill in for Tre until he returns?  Joe Haden, Kyle Fuller, Janoris Jenkins, Xavier Rhodes, jason Verrett, Bryce Callahan, AJ Bouye, Kevin King can’t be that guy?  All could possibly supplant Dane as cb2 when Tre returns.   

 

I find a flaw in your rational if you think we were truly in on Gilmore. Our "interest" was almost definitely just checking in on if we could get a bargain for him being available this late in FA. If he was truly someone we were interested in at the price range he were asking, we'd have been in on him early and would have been one of his visits.

 

Any of these other guys you mentioned are band aids. They're either ancient, career journeyman, or guys who have underperformed in recent years. Fuller, for example, was benched last season for poor play.

 

If the plan were to simply go veteran, they wouldn't have let the market dry up this much. It would have been addressed before now. I think we'll grab a guy later in the Offseason for a bargain. But that's just to provide some extra help with Tre down and depth. With what we're paying Tre, I think we're looking for an upgrade in talent from Levi long term at a cost controlled price. Only way to do that is to Draft a guy.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Looks like we get Oj McDuffie again unless dude doesn’t take Wilson. But he will. 


I’m not going to list him in the poll.  He was already in the first one.  
 

How many will ask me about it?  Over/Under 20? 😋

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

If he wants one of the top four CB's, better chance that they won't be there at 25 than it is they are. I'm not saying a massive move for a Gardner or Stingley is likely (though I don't think it's a definite no), calling him an "idiot" to make a move up a few picks to guarantee he gets the guy he wants is ridiculous.

OK. It really is fine if we disagree.

Btw, was "rank amateur" OK? :) 

Edited by Bill from NYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

I don't understand the logic in this. We have to select a different guy in Round 1 each time? 


Because we’ve already established he was the pick with another poll.  Why do it again?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Virgil said:


Because we’ve already established he was the pick with another poll.  Why do it again?

 

Because in this mock, he'd be the best available CB. Would you remove all other CB's too? And if not, why select a lesser talent? I just think doing mocks for the sake of drafting someone different each time is odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

I'd add him there could be players available that weren't there in the first vote.   


True, it’s just not how we’ve done it in the past.  One of the goals is to see how accurate the Bills pick is and have multiple chances at it. 

4 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Because in this mock, he'd be the best available CB. Would you remove all other CB's too? And if not, why select a lesser talent? I just think doing mocks for the sake of drafting someone different each time is odd.

 

Nope, I will list the top players at their position that rank within the top 40, minus McDuffie.  If people vote to reach for the next DB, that's up to the masses

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Virgil changed the title to TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - The Cowboys (Just Joshin') are on the clock
8 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

I find a flaw in your rational if you think we were truly in on Gilmore. Our "interest" was almost definitely just checking in on if we could get a bargain for him being available this late in FA. If he was truly someone we were interested in at the price range he were asking, we'd have been in on him early and would have been one of his visits.

 

Any of these other guys you mentioned are band aids. They're either ancient, career journeyman, or guys who have underperformed in recent years. Fuller, for example, was benched last season for poor play.

 

If the plan were to simply go veteran, they wouldn't have let the market dry up this much. It would have been addressed before now. I think we'll grab a guy later in the Offseason for a bargain. But that's just to provide some extra help with Tre down and depth. With what we're paying Tre, I think we're looking for an upgrade in talent from Levi long term at a cost controlled price. Only way to do that is to Draft a guy.

Yeah….our interest was certainly only limited to within our price range and obviously his price range was out of our range.  That goes without saying.  I never said we were going all in on him.  We would have signed him if he had agreed to our offer…..which would have eliminated a cb in round one imo….and your rationale.  
 

Regarding the underlined…..the best way to do that is via the draft, I agree.  But you’re insinuating that the only draft pick is our first pick.  
 

Tre is one of the highest paid corners.  Taron is one of the highest paid slots.  Poyer and Hyde are getting almost 10M.  Meanwhile, under Beane, we’ve drafted one corner in 3 drafts and have been happy starting UDFAs and 7th round picks.  Our 1st rd pick is our most valuable asset and paying all those DBs big bucks plus using our most valuable asset on another corner……I don’t see it.  It makes sense looking at our holes, but I don’t think we’ll be trading up for one, which would likely cost us another 1st rd pick next year. 
 

maybe you’re right.  I don’t like the scenario 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Virgil said:


True, it’s just not how we’ve done it in the past.  One of the goals is to see how accurate the Bills pick is and have multiple chances at it. 

 

Nope, I will list the top players at their position that rank within the top 40, minus McDuffie.  If people vote to reach for the next DB, that's up to the masses

Just like Democracy! Limiting our choices between, Chitt and Richard Sandwiches since 1776 😭 (jk virg i like taking McDuffie off the board. Allows us to see much different scenarios play out in rd2 as well)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, NewEra said:

It makes sense looking at our holes, but I don’t think we’ll be trading up for one, which would likely cost us another 1st rd pick next year. 

 

maybe you’re right.  I don’t like the scenario 

 

Sure, it will cost a 1st if you want Gardner or Stingley. But i'm more or less talking about moving up for Booth or McDuffie, if one is the guy Beane has targeted. About half of all mocks and more than half of the simulations I've done have them both gone a few picks before 25. It wouldn't cost a 1st to move up a handful of picks. I don't see Beane just sitting on his hands and hoping his guy falls to 25.

 

And if we wait until Round 2 - there is most likely a large dropoff by the time 57 rolls around. We'd be lucky if McCreary were on the board. Elam and Gordon will be long gone.

 

I personally feel that after watching the Playoffs, they decided they needed more talent than Levi on the other side. If we wait until Round 57 or 89, we could luck out. But with the hole we have and Tre being out, I don't see that as a wise move.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...