Jump to content

Diggs Extended 4 more years breaking news per WGR 550


BillsPride12

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Fan in Chicago said:

Fantastic news. Imho, this doesn't change our draft strategy. 

 

To echo many others in this thread - where the heck is this money appearing from? (not that I care, just being curious)

This is future years and should lower the cap hit this year and maybe next. 

Edited by Not at the table Karlos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CapeBreton said:

Did not see that coming but looks like a good deal! I do worry about WRs not aging well these days and Diggs was banged up pretty much all of last year so that’s not a great sign, but glad he’s back! 

 

I think Diggs/Adams style of WR ages much better than Tyreek Hill, so if they're going to lock up a WR who will be closing in on mid 30's by the end of the contract (should it fully play out), i'd much rather it be a technician rather than an athletic/speed guy. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate even going there, but a Gilmore acquisition could be the thing that moves the needle to a SB.

 

I know I sound like one of the guys that I poke holes in for madden talk.  I still love the idea of the Syracuse article yesterday where we swap #1’s, give next years #1, and a 3rd for the agiants 7th for sauce Gardner of still there at 7.  That’s what I prefer as cheap labor for five years.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

What? No but he does need to start hitting on picks cause we can’t keep signing free agents. He also drafted josh and that gives a chance to win every year. We have to get cheaper at certain positions. That’s just a fact

you sign free agents every year and draft players every year. It's how you build a team and he does a very good job of drafting. Stop worrying about money and salary cap.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CapeBreton said:

Did not see that coming but looks like a good deal! I do worry about WRs not aging well these days and Diggs was banged up pretty much all of last year so that’s not a great sign, but glad he’s back! 

What? You did not see a contract extension for Diggs? I don't recall him being banged up at all last year. Seemed pretty healthy to me

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, machine gun kelly said:

I hate even going there, but a Gilmore acquisition could be the thing that moves the needle to a SB.

 

I know I sound like one of the guys that I poke holes in for madden talk.  I still love the idea of the Syracuse article yesterday where we swap #1’s, give next years #1, and a 3rd for the agiants 7th for sauce Gardner of still there at 7.  That’s what I prefer as cheap labor for five years.

Seems like they extended diggs now to free up some money for a cb…if I had to guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CapeBreton said:

Did not see that coming but looks like a good deal! I do worry about WRs not aging well these days and Diggs was banged up pretty much all of last year so that’s not a great sign, but glad he’s back! 

Really?? Assumed it was expected myself, at least at some point. I do recall seeing a couple posters that were saying they thought he would be traded for some reason (don't know the reason making one believe that)....

 

There was no way Diggs wasn't going to get taken care of eventually or traded imo

I LOVE it that both sides have intentions for Diggs to retire a Bill. Very excited to hear that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

Really?? Assumed it was expected myself, at least at some point. I do recall seeing a couple posters that were saying they thought he would be traded for some reason (don't know the reason making one believe that)....

 

There was no way Diggs wasn't going to get taken care of eventually or traded imo

 

The Adams/Hill deals are why people speculated that we might have to trade him.   That was all under the assumption that he'd want Tyreek Hill money.  Those of us who worried he'd demand that, myself included, were wrong.  This is a very fair deal.  

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...