Jump to content

[Name Only Title] Myles Jack?


cage

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Back2Buff said:

 

No he didn't.

 

3 tackles for loss and no sacks.  No pass break ups or INTs.  

 

Get rid of the name and actually watch the player

I misread a tweet from the cover 1 guys.

And I literally said "I don't watch jags games" lol why would anyone? Was a question about how he racked up his tackles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gugny said:

 

 

It isn't BS.  Here's a list of tackles for loss last year.  If you want to see Edmunds, get that scrolling finger warmed up ... https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/defense-tackles-for-loss

 


But see this is a flawed analysis.  What you hate is how Edmunds is used.  He isn’t used as a penetrating LB, he used almost like a 3rd safety out there.

 

People want to see these splash plays behind the LOS, but that’s just not how we frequently use him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo619 said:

Fun fact.  Whaley wanted to draft Myles in the second round but had to settle for Ragland. 

Ragland did get us Hughes. Jack would be a distant memory if we had drafted him then.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PFF Grades (For those who put some merit in them)

 

Edmunds

2021: 50.4

2020: 47.9

2019: 60.6

2018: 57.0

 

Jack

2021: 37.7

2020: 69.1

2019: 45.9

2018: 68.3

2017: 71.7

 

I honestly don't think either is the answer for the Bills short or long term.  Picking up Edmunds option was a mistake as Ive said since they did it.

Edited by Billy Zabka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Billy Zabka said:

PFF Grades (For those who put some merit in them)

 

Edmunds

2021: 50.4

2020: 47.9

2019: 60.6

2018: 57.0

 

Jack

2021: 37.7

2020: 69.1

2019: 45.9

2018: 68.3

2017: 71.7

 

I honestly don't think either is the answer for the Bills short or long term.  Picking up Edmunds option was a mistake as Ive said since they did it.

That’s why I’d like the Bills to pursue a trade rather than an extension. Something tells me the Edmunds camp has a dollar amount much higher than what the Bills value him and that’s why we haven’t seen an extension yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/15/2022 at 12:02 PM, Udubalum07 said:

I would prefer if we could get a 2nd for Tremaine and draft Chad Muma. Much more of an instinctive, playmaking middle linebacker. Use the cap savings to sign Chandler Jones. 

Good luck getting the second.  I have to believe if that offer was made it would be done.  Shed that contract and get a longer term solution in place, yep!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Oh well....there goes another one that would've been cheaper & better than Edmunds. Pittsburgh is quietly building an interesting team.  Gotta love that brilliant 12.7 option. 

That’s the sort of contract that I feel Edmunds is worth. I saw PFF had Jack above a 60 grade in 3 of his 5 years with a high of 74 while Edmunds has only been at 60 once, which is also the highest he’s ever been graded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

That’s the sort of contract that I feel Edmunds is worth. I saw PFF had Jack above a 60 grade in 3 of his 5 years with a high of 74 while Edmunds has only been at 60 once, which is also the highest he’s ever been graded.

I watched Jack at UCLA.  He is a baller and has so much more instincts than we're ever going to see from Tremaine. It's ironic because I think Myles is a 9-10M/yr guy production wise. And I have Tremaine's value as a glorified strong safety as 8/yr.  I'm sure Beane has at least inquired trading 49. And I bet they're are very few suitors. I'm afraid we're flat out stuck with him this season.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...