BillsFanNC Posted August 1, 2022 Author Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 1, 2022 Author Share Posted August 1, 2022 DOJ/FBI always has the Ole FISA trick in their back pocket to spy on American citizens. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 Is this the law and order thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 Judge rejects terrorism sentencing penalty in Jan. 6 case (msn.com) Federal prosecutors' first request to draw tougher punishment for a Jan. 6 defendant by classifying his actions as domestic terrorism fell short Monday as a federal judge declined to apply the more severe sentencing guidelines permitted under federal law in such cases. U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich said applying the sentencing enhancement to Guy Reffitt, 49, would create an "unwarranted sentencing disparity" with other cases involving similar threats or conduct related to the Capitol riot. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/judge-rejects-terrorism-sentencing-penalty-in-jan-6-case/ar-AA10bEhO?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b21fff94d7a349238617f1d12d2224eb . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 2, 2022 Author Share Posted August 2, 2022 Dems and their GOP partners will one day pay heavily for all of this crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 3, 2022 Author Share Posted August 3, 2022 If cross examination of J6 committee testimony was allowed, I'd sure like to see someone ask capitol police officers if this type of stuff is standard crowd control protocol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 3, 2022 Author Share Posted August 3, 2022 (edited) I remember seeing this footage of the Qanon shaman awhile back, but it's extremely difficult to find now...I wonder why? I finally found it buried inside this longer video. The link starts with the Qanon shaman, aka Jacob Chansley, as he is escorted inside the Senate chamber....by a Capitol police officer. At one point the officer asks Chansley and a few others milling around: "Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?" And then they pray. It's horrific scene of violent bloodthirsty insurrectionists!!! Let's show this video at the next prime time hearing shall we? Edited August 3, 2022 by DRsGhost 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 2 hours ago, DRsGhost said: I remember seeing this footage of the Qanon shaman awhile back, but it's extremely difficult to find now...I wonder why? I finally found it buried inside this longer video. The link starts with the Qanon shaman, aka Jacob Chansley, as he is escorted inside the Senate chamber....by a Capitol police officer. At one point the officer asks Chansley and a few others milling around: "Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?" And then they pray. It's horrific scene of violent bloodthirsty insurrectionists!!! Let's show this video at the next prime time hearing shall we? LOL you are beyond stupid. Almost GQP level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 3, 2022 Author Share Posted August 3, 2022 8 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: LOL you are beyond stupid. Almost GQP level. As i've said to numerous other posters, that analysis coming from the likes of a moron such as yourself I wear proudly as a badge of honor. Now go and hang on every lie this sham committee spoon feeds you....or just ***** off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: As i've said to numerous other posters, that analysis coming from the likes of a moron such as yourself I wear proudly as a badge of honor. Now go and hang on every lie this sham committee spoon feeds you....or just ***** off. You post that video to make that point? What's next? TikTok videos that show voter fraud? My god. The sham committee is made up of patriot republicans. Something that is dead now thanks to your cult. Edited August 3, 2022 by nedboy7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 3, 2022 Author Share Posted August 3, 2022 3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: You post that video to make that point? What's next? TikTok videos that show voter fraud? My god. The sham committee is made up of patriot republicans. Something that is dead now thanks to your cult. First of all Democrats and Republicans both suck ass, although as of late the democrats are trying really hard to lay sole claim to that title. This isn't an attempt to prove that any of these individuals are innocent. It is however proof of the sham committee and media once again leaving out key parts of what happened on J6 that don't fit their narrative. I understand that you might have some difficulty with that level of nuance, but try to follow along. The friggin Qanon shaman is the #1 poster boy for the violent Capitol "insurrection" narrative. Yet here in this video it shows... Chansley calmly strolling into the senate chamber followed by a Capitol police officer who is doing absolutely nothing to stop him. The same capitol police officer asks if they would please leave to which Chansley and another guy calmly respond that they will leave and they are making sure that nobody is disrespecting the place. Then they say a group prayer. No violence whatsoever. They don't break anything, burn anything, try to injure anyone or do anything at all that can even be remotely called insurrectionist behavior. Yet still Chansley is branded as a violent insurrectionist. They are certainly trespassers who broke the law, but violent insurrectionists? I'm sorry but if you still cling to that narrative then Orwell wants to have a word.... “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 17 hours ago, DRsGhost said: First of all Democrats and Republicans both suck ass, although as of late the democrats are trying really hard to lay sole claim to that title. This isn't an attempt to prove that any of these individuals are innocent. It is however proof of the sham committee and media once again leaving out key parts of what happened on J6 that don't fit their narrative. I understand that you might have some difficulty with that level of nuance, but try to follow along. The friggin Qanon shaman is the #1 poster boy for the violent Capitol "insurrection" narrative. Yet here in this video it shows... Chansley calmly strolling into the senate chamber followed by a Capitol police officer who is doing absolutely nothing to stop him. The same capitol police officer asks if they would please leave to which Chansley and another guy calmly respond that they will leave and they are making sure that nobody is disrespecting the place. Then they say a group prayer. No violence whatsoever. They don't break anything, burn anything, try to injure anyone or do anything at all that can even be remotely called insurrectionist behavior. Yet still Chansley is branded as a violent insurrectionist. They are certainly trespassers who broke the law, but violent insurrectionists? I'm sorry but if you still cling to that narrative then Orwell wants to have a word.... “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” Ok maybe we agree more than we think actually. Yes I get your point. I don't see the shaman idiot as the poster child of that day however. If you look at how autocratic governments begin it is usually with rejecting elections and claiming any election they dont win is rigged. Not with idiots whining about gender issues. Yes both parties suck but I guess we both hate one more than the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demongyz Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 30 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Ok maybe we agree more than we think actually. Yes I get your point. I don't see the shaman idiot as the poster child of that day however. If you look at how autocratic governments begin it is usually with rejecting elections and claiming any election they dont win is rigged. Not with idiots whining about gender issues. Yes both parties suck but I guess we both hate one more than the other. Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration? Something like that right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 8 minutes ago, Demongyz said: Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration? Something like that right? In fairness he may have just been Nedtoddler7 way back then. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Demongyz said: Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration? Something like that right? This. Not to mention what they did to Trump had an infinitely greater chance of overthrowing the government than what happened on J6. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Demongyz said: Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration? Something like that right? The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society. Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.) The bipartisan tone of the majority of the report, released by a committee chaired by Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, should be welcomed by all Americans who want our elected leaders to protect American sovereignty. National security should never be a partisan issue. But that is not my point. Anyone who starts to suggest any election they lose is rigged is aiming towards a dictatorship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society. Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.) The bipartisan tone of the majority of the report, released by a committee chaired by Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, should be welcomed by all Americans who want our elected leaders to protect American sovereignty. National security should never be a partisan issue. But that is not my point. Anyone who starts to suggest any election they lose is rigged is aiming towards a dictatorship. So if Putin and Russia helped Trump win in 2016 where were they in 2020? Those Commie bastards let us down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 4 minutes ago, wnyguy said: So if Putin and Russia helped Trump win in 2016 where were they in 2020? Those Commie bastards let us down. So why didn't Trump lock up Hillary. Let's ask ######ed questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demongyz Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 22 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society. Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.) The bipartisan tone of the majority of the report, released by a committee chaired by Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, should be welcomed by all Americans who want our elected leaders to protect American sovereignty. National security should never be a partisan issue. But that is not my point. Anyone who starts to suggest any election they lose is rigged is aiming towards a dictatorship. Don't you find it odd that the party that controls the House, Senate and Presidency is so worried about dictatorship? Isn't it odd that the party of lock people up, force people take shots is afraid of dictators? You should look long and hard at what the Democratic party is doing. 14 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: So why didn't Trump lock up Hillary. Let's ask ######ed questions. Because if you target the opposing party and attempt to put all of them in jail, the country becomes a dictatorship... What is going on now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts