BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 (edited) Oh. Link to actual memo included.in story. The Capitol Police official timeline provides the most succinct summary of a series of events around Sund's request, some of which have been disputed and at times misreported in the news media. "COP Sund asks Senate Sergeant at Arms (SSAA) Michael Stenger and House Sergeant at Arms (HSAA) Paul Irving for authority to have National Guard to assist with security for the January 6, 2021 event based on briefing with law enforcement partner and revised intelligence Assessment," the timeline recorded. "COP Sund's request is denied. SSAA and HSAA tell COP Sund to contact General Walker at DC National Guard to discuss the guard's ability to support a request if needed." The Capitol Police timeline shows what we have been saying for the last year — that DOD support via the National Guard was refused by the House and Senate sergeant at arms, who report to Pelosi," Patel said. "Now we have it in their own writing, days before Jan. 6. And despite the FBI warning of potential for serious disturbance, no perimeter was established, no agents put on the street, and no fence put up." Gee, I wonder why we haven't heard any of Patels testimony to the J6 committee? Cmon @ChiGoose do we have a deal? Edited June 24, 2022 by DRsGhost 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 Is Patel your boyfriend or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 2 minutes ago, 716er said: Is Patel your boyfriend or something? Patel is a grifter, so he targets the easiest marks that most grifters target: diehard Trump supporters. Tell them what they want to hear and then sell them a book or some vitamin pills or whatever. He's not as good as Trump though, who can just ask for money for a defense fund that doesn't exist and they'll give him $250 million. But you gotta start somewhere! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Patel is a grifter, so he targets the easiest marks that most grifters target: diehard Trump supporters. Tell them what they want to hear and then sell them a book or some vitamin pills or whatever. He's not as good as Trump though, who can just ask for money for a defense fund that doesn't exist and they'll give him $250 million. But you gotta start somewhere! Care to comment coward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 7 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: Care to comment coward? According to this article, the request was denied by the House and Senate Seargant at Arms: Quote "COP Sund asks Senate Sergeant at Arms (SSAA) Michael Stenger and House Sergeant at Arms (HSAA) Paul Irving for authority to have National Guard to assist with security for the January 6, 2021 event based on briefing with law enforcement partner and revised intelligence Assessment," the timeline recorded. "COP Sund's request is denied. SSAA and HSAA tell COP Sund to contact General Walker at DC National Guard to discuss the guard's ability to support a request if needed." Considering that both of them lost their jobs the very next day, it would seem they royally screwed up and got what they deserved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: According to this article, the request was denied by the House and Senate Seargant at Arms: Considering that both of them lost their jobs the very next day, it would seem they royally screwed up and got what they deserved. Also denied by DC mayor. She has her job still. Seems like this is pretty relevant to the happenings of J6, no? Why did we not hear about this from the committee? We know Patels testimony highlighted this grave error. Yet they haven't shared it, nor will they. Why did it take someone on a Bills message board to link to a 2 week old story for you to be made aware of the timeline of this massive failure? Because this committee is interested in telling you A story, not THE story. It's all politics. Every last bit of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 Just now, DRsGhost said: Also denied by DC mayor. She has her job still. Seems like this is pretty relevant to the happenings of J6, no? Why did we not hear about this from the committee? We know Patels testimony highlighted this grave error. Yet they haven't shared it, nor will they. Why did it take someone on a Bills message board to link to a 2 week old story for you to be made aware of the timeline of this massive failure? Because this committee is interested in telling you A story, not THE story. It's all politics. Every last bit of it. Wait, you think I wasn't aware that they did not have the proper security for Jan 6th? It was clear that the decision was made that they didn't need the kind of force that they had for the riots after George Floyd's death. And it was clear that the people who made that decision were wrong. And of the three people on the board that oversees the Capitol Police, two of them lost their jobs the next day. None of this is new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 1 minute ago, ChiGoose said: Wait, you think I wasn't aware that they did not have the proper security for Jan 6th? It was clear that the decision was made that they didn't need the kind of force that they had for the riots after George Floyd's death. And it was clear that the people who made that decision were wrong. And of the three people on the board that oversees the Capitol Police, two of them lost their jobs the next day. None of this is new. Reading comprehension dude. The memo and the exact timeline of the denials you were not aware of. Has the committee shared that the Trump administration formally asked for up to 20k national guard troops in the days before J6 and the request was denied on multiple fronts? Why hasnt the committee in search of truth shared that information? They certainly must have had access to the very same memo. Gee, I wonder why they wouldn't share information that is exculpatory.....that's a tough one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 1 minute ago, DRsGhost said: Reading comprehension dude. The memo and the exact timeline of the denials you were not aware of. Has the committee shared that the Trump administration formally asked for up to 20k national guard troops in the days before J6 and the request was denied on multiple fronts? Why hasnt the committee in search of truth shared that information? They certainly must have had access to the very same memo. Gee, I wonder why they wouldn't share information that is exculpatory.....that's a tough one! Ok, let's say that you're correct. Frankly, I don't have the time or patience to chase down everything posted on RedStateThisIsRealNewsBenShapiroFederalistWeThinkOurReadersAreIdiotsAndWeAreScammingThemForProfitDotCom, but let's say you're right: Trump asked for more security and it was denied by Nancy Pelosi, the Deep State, Democratic Socialist Liz Cheney, the reverse vampires, Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and all of those people who eat babies. How is that exculpatory for the recorded phone call where Trump commits a crime? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Ok, let's say that you're correct. Frankly, I don't have the time or patience to chase down everything posted on RedStateThisIsRealNewsBenShapiroFederalistWeThinkOurReadersAreIdiotsAndWeAreScammingThemForProfitDotCom, but let's say you're right: Trump asked for more security and it was denied by Nancy Pelosi, the Deep State, Democratic Socialist Liz Cheney, the reverse vampires, Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and all of those people who eat babies. You're pathetic. As I knew you'd come back with the right wing sources shtick....I specifically highlighted that the f-ing memo being reported on is linked to in the story. As in you can click on it and read it all for yourself. Seriously, ***** off with this shtick. 9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: How is that exculpatory for the recorded phone call where Trump commits a crime? You're going to have to fill me in. Actually someone else please fill me in. What's the latest "we've got him this time" load? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 So he just ***** Kash Patel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 14 hours ago, DRsGhost said: And it's always great knowing the real DR lives comfortably inside your head almost two years after his departure. Beautiful! 👆 Tell me you're delusional without telling me you're delusional... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 13 hours ago, reddogblitz said: At first blush, thinking the FBI or FBI informants being involved seems nutty and conspiratorial. But if you think about what they have done in the recent past , it makes me wonder. The Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot comes to mind. Seems they like to coax people into committing crimes and come swooping in at the last minute to save the day. They also seem to like to pick people easily duped like people with schizophrenia to do the crimes. Like the bomb plot in Portland. Laugh it off if you must, but its really not out of character for the FBI to be involved. https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/23/the-whitmer-kidnapping-case-reveals-the-fbis-new-counterterrorism-target-is-you/ https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-informants-had-bigger-role-213400243.html https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/portlanders-condemn-bomb-plot-criticize-fbi-probe/ Oh I don’t doubt this may have happened. But it doesn’t come close to accounting for, or overriding or excusing, an attempted COUP by an outgoing President, nor does it excuse the morons who stormed the building. It’s classic Soviet-era “whataboutism” designed to distract, deny, and obscure the real issue. (Not saying you’re doing that - it’s obvious who in this thread is doing it.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 This committe is a one sided political clown show? You don't say... And how many times has the phrase "attack on our democracy" been uttered by members of this sham clown committee? Commies gonna commie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 1 hour ago, DRsGhost said: This committe is a one sided political clown show? You don't say... And how many times has the phrase "attack on our democracy" been uttered by members of this sham clown committee? Commies gonna commie. And fascists gonna fascist. You are the primo example of someone who only surfs “news” outlets for confirmation of his own demented beliefs. There are few things worse than the tyranny of a closed mind. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 35 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said: And fascists gonna fascist. You are the primo example of someone who only surfs “news” outlets for confirmation of his own demented beliefs. There are few things worse than the tyranny of a closed mind. Oh I don't know about that. I think talking "threats to democracy" constantly while at the same time looking the other way as federal thugs are sent to harass people in their private homes might just be a tad bit more tyrannical. Of course you condemning someone as a fascist because they carry a differering political opinion sure comes close. The hypocrisy is boundless with you morons. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 4 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: Oh I don't know about that. I think talking "threats to democracy" constantly while at the same time looking the other way as federal thugs are sent to harass people in their private homes might just be a tad bit more tyrannical. Of course you condemning someone as a fascist because they carry a differering political opinion sure comes close. The hypocrisy is boundless with you morons. I think these folks really need to look up the definition of fascism. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 24, 2022 Author Share Posted June 24, 2022 3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I think these folks really need to look up the definition of fascism. I'm pretty certain that would make no difference to them whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted June 24, 2022 Share Posted June 24, 2022 3 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: I'm pretty certain that would make no difference to them whatsoever. It wouldn’t, but it would at least be a small step in the right direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts